• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Subscribe
  • RSS

China Cracks Down On Time Travel

At least on television:

BEIJING — In a bizarre move, China’s television censors have issued new guidelines that all but ban TV dramas featuring time travel.

In a statement (available here in Chinese) dated March 31, the State Administration for Radio, Film & Television said that TV dramas that involve characters traveling back in time “lack positive thoughts and meaning.” The guidelines discouraging this type of show said that some “casually make up myths, have monstrous and weird plots, use absurd tactics, and even promote feudalism, superstition, fatalism and reincarnation.”

The guidelines, which fell short of an outright ban of such dramas, seem to have come in response to a series of popular programs about protagonists drifting back to ancient times. For instance, in “Palace,” one of China’s hottest TV series, a woman falls in love with a Qing dynasty painting, travels back in time and then falls in love with several princes.

(…)

A spokesman for the State Administration declined Tuesday to elaborate on the reason behind the new guidelines. But the Chinese authorities are known for strictly censoring newspapers, film and TV programs that are deemed “unhealthy.”

One struggles to wonder why Chinese authorities would be concerned with this type of program.

 

Related Posts

About Doug Mataconis
Doug is an attorney in private practice in Northern Virginia. He holds a B.A. in Political Science from Rutgers University and J.D. from George Mason University School of Law. He joined the staff of OTB in May, 2010 and also writes at Below The Beltway. Follow Doug on Twitter | Facebook

Comments

  1. michael reynolds says:

    Good for them. I’ve written a couple of time travel books and let me tell you: they are a pain in the ass to construct. If only the Chinese government had just pulled me aside and said, “Dude: paradoxes. Just don’t go there. Just walk away.”

    Helpful or Unhelpful: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. george says:

    Total waste of time on their part. They should be concentrating their fire on plots based on malfunctioning holodecks.

    Helpful or Unhelpful: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. john personna says:

    The coverage I read said that they didn’t like time travel stories that implied a better past.

    Helpful or Unhelpful: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Tardis says:

    Well, their future is pooched. They fall apart in 2078 over there.

    Helpful or Unhelpful: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. tom p says:

    One struggles to wonder why Chinese authorities would be concerned with this type of program.

    I don’t struggle at all. I find it quite easy to wonder why they would concern themselves with it.

    (sorry Doug, could not resist)

    Helpful or Unhelpful: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. Southern Hoosier says:

    Well there goes Dr. Who reruns.

    Helpful or Unhelpful: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. Thanks for the information regarding it.. I was not aware of it.. I have come to know about a great resource from your post..

    Helpful or Unhelpful: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  8. Michael says:

    While they’re at it, they should ban story lines that ultimately turn out to be nothing more than holo-deck simulations or dream sequences.

    Helpful or Unhelpful: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  9. Michael says:

    I’ve written a couple of time travel books and let me tell you: they are a pain in the ass to construct.

    I don’t see how they’re difficult, as long as you stick to one of two rules:

    1) The future can not be changed, regardless of what you do in the past (either through ignorance or impotence, you can not do anything in the past that you didn’t already do in the past)

    2) Causality does not require an unbroken connection (the fact that you did travel to the past is enough of a cause to allow you to exist in the past to kill your own grandfather).

    The Babylon5 video posted last week was a perfect example of an awesome story line that held to the first rule. Card’s novel “Past Watch” was a good example of employing the second.

    Helpful or Unhelpful: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0