http://www.outsidethebeltway.com Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:10:31 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-126963 StumbleUpon » Your page is now on StumbleUpon! Sun, 20 May 2007 08:34:09 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/#comment-126963 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Your page is on StumbleUpon [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] Your page is on StumbleUpon [...]

]]> http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-125749 EMU Billedforbud Sun, 13 May 2007 15:35:13 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/#comment-125749 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...]     INDLEDNING  Muhammed-sagen, Jyllandspost-sagen, eller blot "tegningerne" - er pt. den største indenrigs- og udenrigspolitiske sag i Danmark siden ja, nogle mener nogensinde! Dette tema har ikke et politisk fokus, men vil forsøge dels at bringe de religionsfaglige begreber, som giver baggrund for at forstÃ¥ sagen: Hvad betyder billedforbudet egentlig? - Hvad er blasfemi? - og findes der tilsvarende forbud i andre religioner? dels at  give læseren inspiration til fordybning i emnet via links til diverse nyhedsmedier. Der er pt. ogsÃ¥ et par links til hvordan emnet kan anvendes i undervisningen i samfundsfag. De pink faktabokse indeholder citater fra love og regler. Direkte adgang til artikler kræver UNI.LOGIN Kilderne er fra internettet, samt GADS religionsleksikon og Gyldendals religionsleksikon.   TEGNINGERNELink til tegningerne fra Jyllands Posten Link til de tegninger som var med i imamernes mappe (pdf). Tegningerne er med arabisk tekst. Dansk  oversættelse kan ses i Politikens Muhammed-tema.   UNDERVISNING Muhammedkrisen og undervisningen i gymnasietSynspunkt af Allan Poulsen, Kolding Amtsgymnasium. Fra Gymnasieskolen nr. 8 2006. "Muhammedkrisen kan ikke undgÃ¥ at fÃ¥ konsekvenser i  gymnasieundervisningen "  Ugen pÃ¥ spidsenP1 udsendelse fra d. 10 februar 2006 bl.a. om hvordan krisen pÃ¥virker de unge og hvordan man inddrager den i undervisningen i gymnasiet. Lektor i historie og samfundsfag Kirsten Jensen rapporterer fra klasseværelserne pÃ¥ Avedøre gymnasium, hvor 40% af eleverne  har en anden etnisk baggrund end dansk.    Minitema fra EMU samfundsfagRollespil over en TV-debat om sagen om Muhammedtegningerne. Materialerne bestÃ¥r af en spil- og rollebeskrivelse og et observationskema. Begge dele er udarbejdet af Jens Christian Holck i Februar 2006.   JURA Rigsadvokatens afgørelseLæs rigsadvokatens gennemgang af Jyllands-Postens artikel "Muhammeds ansigt" (10 s.). Bilag 1 omfatter diverse retsregler (10 s.), bilag 2 er en beskrivelse af Islam og profeten Muhammed ( 5 s.).  ORDBOG  Billedforbud: (billeddyrkelse, billedstrid, idol, ikonoklast) Monoteistiske religioner forbyder ofte fremstilling af billeder, skulpturer m.m. især af Gud og andet, der hører til den himmelske verden, men ofte ogsÃ¥ af mennesker og dyr. Forbudets formÃ¥l er at forhindre afgudsdyrkelse. Blasfemi:  ( af græsk: blasfemia) Bespottelse eller grov forhÃ¥nelse af det, som i en religion anses for helligt eller ophøjet. Det kan være humoristiske udtalelser, hvor det hellige inddrages i en banal/plat sammenhæng, der stemples som blasfemi. I Danske Lov fra 1683 er straffen udskæring af tungen og derefter halshugning for den, der kendes skyldig i »at have lastet Gud eller bespottet hans hellige Navn, Ord og Sacramenter.« I 1683 var kun én religion tilladt i Danmark, og paragraffen tog udelukkende sigte pÃ¥ at beskytte Gud mod krænkelse. I den gældende paragraf (se pink boks) er det derimod religiøse menneskers ret til at have deres religion i fred for spot og forhÃ¥nelse, der skal beskyttes. Paragraffen anvendes sjældent pÃ¥ grund af vanskeligheden ved at fastlægge ytringsfrihedens grænser. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...]   INDLEDNING  Muhammed-sagen, Jyllandspost-sagen, eller blot "tegningerne" - er pt. den største indenrigs- og udenrigspolitiske sag i Danmark siden ja, nogle mener nogensinde! Dette tema har ikke et politisk fokus, men vil forsøge dels at bringe de religionsfaglige begreber, som giver baggrund for at forstÃ¥ sagen: Hvad betyder billedforbudet egentlig? - Hvad er blasfemi? - og findes der tilsvarende forbud i andre religioner? dels at give læseren inspiration til fordybning i emnet via links til diverse nyhedsmedier. Der er pt. ogsÃ¥ et par links til hvordan emnet kan anvendes i undervisningen i samfundsfag. De pink faktabokse indeholder citater fra love og regler. Direkte adgang til artikler kræver UNI.LOGIN Kilderne er fra internettet, samt GADS religionsleksikon og Gyldendals religionsleksikon.   TEGNINGERNELink til tegningerne fra Jyllands Posten Link til de tegninger som var med i imamernes mappe (pdf). Tegningerne er med arabisk tekst. Dansk oversættelse kan ses i Politikens Muhammed-tema.   UNDERVISNING Muhammedkrisen og undervisningen i gymnasietSynspunkt af Allan Poulsen, Kolding Amtsgymnasium. Fra Gymnasieskolen nr. 8 2006. "Muhammedkrisen kan ikke undgÃ¥ at fÃ¥ konsekvenser i gymnasieundervisningen "  Ugen pÃ¥ spidsenP1 udsendelse fra d. 10 februar 2006 bl.a. om hvordan krisen pÃ¥virker de unge og hvordan man inddrager den i undervisningen i gymnasiet. Lektor i historie og samfundsfag Kirsten Jensen rapporterer fra klasseværelserne pÃ¥ Avedøre gymnasium, hvor 40% af eleverne har en anden etnisk baggrund end dansk.   Minitema fra EMU samfundsfagRollespil over en TV-debat om sagen om Muhammedtegningerne. Materialerne bestÃ¥r af en spil- og rollebeskrivelse og et observationskema. Begge dele er udarbejdet af Jens Christian Holck i Februar 2006.   JURA Rigsadvokatens afgørelseLæs rigsadvokatens gennemgang af Jyllands-Postens artikel "Muhammeds ansigt" (10 s.). Bilag 1 omfatter diverse retsregler (10 s.), bilag 2 er en beskrivelse af Islam og profeten Muhammed ( 5 s.).  ORDBOG  Billedforbud: (billeddyrkelse, billedstrid, idol, ikonoklast) Monoteistiske religioner forbyder ofte fremstilling af billeder, skulpturer m.m. især af Gud og andet, der hører til den himmelske verden, men ofte ogsÃ¥ af mennesker og dyr. Forbudets formÃ¥l er at forhindre afgudsdyrkelse. Blasfemi: ( af græsk: blasfemia) Bespottelse eller grov forhÃ¥nelse af det, som i en religion anses for helligt eller ophøjet. Det kan være humoristiske udtalelser, hvor det hellige inddrages i en banal/plat sammenhæng, der stemples som blasfemi. I Danske Lov fra 1683 er straffen udskæring af tungen og derefter halshugning for den, der kendes skyldig i »at have lastet Gud eller bespottet hans hellige Navn, Ord og Sacramenter.« I 1683 var kun én religion tilladt i Danmark, og paragraffen tog udelukkende sigte pÃ¥ at beskytte Gud mod krænkelse. I den gældende paragraf (se pink boks) er det derimod religiøse menneskers ret til at have deres religion i fred for spot og forhÃ¥nelse, der skal beskyttes. Paragraffen anvendes sjældent pÃ¥ grund af vanskeligheden ved at fastlægge ytringsfrihedens grænser. [...]

]]> http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-125662 new | generation forum :: Ïðîñìîòð òåìû - Christians killing islamists and burning their mosques. Sat, 12 May 2007 18:50:12 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/#comment-125662 [...] http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/02/nigerian_christians_riot_kill_muslims_in_retaliation/ Tuesday, February 21, 2006 Nigerian Christians Riot, Kill Muslims in Retaliation By James Joyner Nigerian Christians have gone on an anti-Muslim killing spree, apparently in retaliation for earlier murderous riots by Muslims angered over cartoons. Christian mobs rampaged through a southern Nigerian city Tuesday, burning mosques and killing several people in an outbreak of anti-Muslim violence that followed deadly protests against caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad over the weekend. Residents and witnesses in the southern, predominantly Christian city of Onitsha said several Muslims with origins in the north were beaten to death by mobs which also burned two mosques there. “The mosque at the main market has been burnt and I’ve counted at least six dead bodies on the streets,” Izzy Uzor, an Onitsha resident and businessman, told The Associated Press by telephone. “The whole town is in a frenzy and people are running in all directions.” The violence appeared to be in reprisal for anti-Christian violence Saturday in the mostly Muslim northern city of Maiduguri in which thousands of Muslims protesting caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad attacked Christians and burned churches, killing at least 18 people. See Islamic False Prophet Mohamed's cartoons, Curse be upon him: http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons_________________ Knowing that we are fulfilling God's purpose is the only thing that really gives rest to the restless human heart. [...]

]]> http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-125284 [Volokh] Eugene Volokh: The Twelve Mohammed Cartoons, in Detail: Thu, 10 May 2007 21:12:08 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/#comment-125284 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] [Volokh] Eugene Volokh: The Twelve Mohammed Cartoons, in Detail: [Volokh] Eugene Volokh: The Twelve Mohammed Cartoons, in Detail: notify at powerblogs.com notify at powerblogs.com Fri Mar 10 19:01:10 EST 2006 Previous message: [Volokh] Eugene Volokh: "EU-Ministers Considering Arab Demands": Next message: [Volokh] Orin Kerr: What Was Saddam Thinking?: Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] Posted by Eugene Volokh: The Twelve Mohammed Cartoons, in Detail: http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2006_03_05-2006_03_11.shtml#1142035265 One shocking thing about the Mohammed cartoon controversy is how tame many of the cartoons are -- and therefore just how much the cartoons' critics are demanding by arguing that the cartoons ought not be published, or even ought to be outlawed. Here's the dirty dozen, with thanks to Wikipedia (I assume that Wikipedia, being intentionally designed as a public information resource, doesn't mind people's using their bandwidth to serve up the copies): [Jyllands-Posten_Muhammad_drawings.jpg] Bigger images, including translated captions, are available [1]here. (1) The cartoons depict Mohammed, which some Muslims claim is prohibited by Islam (though historically a good deal of Islamic art has depicted Mohammed; the Islamic world has hardly unanimous on this). Fair enough: If you're a Muslim, presumably you can't do this. But to demand that non-Muslims comply with Islamic law is a mighty big demand, much like Orthodox Jews demanding that none of us write the word "God." Thanks, but no thanks: Your sense of what your religion demands doesn't create any obligation, whether legal or moral, on me to go along with your preferences. (2) Some of the cartoons are actually pretty interesting artistically, at least to this observer; the image of Mohammed merged with the green star and crescent, for instance, seems to me an interesting and ingenious composition. The picture of Mohammed in the desert works for me because it humanizes the character, portraying him as a man and not just a symbol. (3) Some of the cartoons have no criticism of Mohammed, of Islam, or of Muslims at all; two (the young schoolteacher and the "PR stunt" one) criticize the newspaper. (4) Some of the cartoons are political commentaries that are pretty clearly criticisms of some strands of modern Islamic culture, but not of Islam generally. The cartoon in which Mohammed is waving off two angry Muslim warriors by saying "Relax guys, it=E2s just a drawing made by some infidel South Jutlander," is a message that true Islam (the teachings of Mohammed) counsels against what some extremist Muslims do in Mohammed's name. The cartoon in which the cartoonist is drawing Mohammed while looking nervously over his shoulder points out -- entirely correctly, as we've learned -- that drawing Mohammed is a perilous activity. (5) Finally, some of the cartoons are indeed cast as criticisms of Islam generally, or of Mohammed generally. The display with the crescents, stars, and Stars of David apparently reads "Prophet, daft and dumb, keeping woman under thumb." Another cartoon depicts Mohammed with a bomb in his turban. Another shows Mohammed telling suicide bombers "Stop, stop, we have run out of virgins!" (referring to the supposed heavenly reward for martyrs) which suggests that Mohammed would endorse the killing of innocents that is modern Muslim suicide bombers' stock in trade. The cartoon that shows a fierce-looking Mohammed with a knife and two veiled women in the background likewise seems like a criticism of Mohammed. (The lineup with Mohammed, Jesus, Buddha, and others strikes me as more a joke than a criticism of the portrayed figures.) These latter items are ones that I as an editor probably would not have published, because I think they're not entirely free. The ones that allude to Muslim violence tar Muslims generally with the sins of particular subgroups of Muslims. The criticism of Muslim treatment of women may be more broadly accurate of a wide range of religious Islamic thought and practice (though not by any means all religious Islamic thought and practice), but seems rhetorically excessive. Yet these sorts of overgeneralizations and rhetorical excesses aimed at historical or religious figures as symbols for a movement are an inevitable part of free debate about ideas. This is especially so for cartoons, slogans, and jokes, which because of their conciseness will almost always oversimplify. It is also so because many of these images are necessarily ambiguous. I do not, for instance, understand the Mohammed with the bomb in his turban as accusing Islam generally; it seems to me to be a condemnation of one particular aspect of Islam -- militant Islam that often centers on murderous violence against those it sees as its enemies. Again, as an editor I would probably have avoided items with this sort of ambiguity; but it is perfectly understandable that other editors would have a different view. To the extent there is a transgression of editorial judgment or good manners here, it is a relatively minor one. Of course I realize that some disagree, and see any even possibly pejorative reference to Mohammed -- or for that matter any depiction of Mohammed -- as a horrible emotional injury. But their subjective feelings, real as they may be to them, are not sufficient reasons for the rest of us to change the way we talk or write. "I'm offended" cannot be justification enough, either in law or in manners, for the conclusion "therefore you must shut up." (Among other things, note that many people are quite understandably offended when others say "I'm offended, therefore you must shut up." If mere offense on some listeners' part is reason enough for the speakers to stop saying, then I take it that those who are offended have an obligation to themselves remain silent.) This is why this issue is so important: Those who demand that the cartoons not be published or republished are cutting at the heart of public debate. They are either demanding that some ideologies not be criticized, or that they be handled with such kid gloves that normal debate about them -- which is inevitably impassioned, given the magnitude of the issues involved -- is practically impossible. This is why the West must resist this pressure to silence, both as a legal matter and as a matter of editorial judgment. References 1. http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons Previous message: [Volokh] Eugene Volokh: "EU-Ministers Considering Arab Demands": Next message: [Volokh] Orin Kerr: What Was Saddam Thinking?: Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] More information about the Volokh mailing list [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] [Volokh] Eugene Volokh: The Twelve Mohammed Cartoons, in Detail: [Volokh] Eugene Volokh: The Twelve Mohammed Cartoons, in Detail: notify at powerblogs.com notify at powerblogs.com Fri Mar 10 19:01:10 EST 2006 Previous message: [Volokh] Eugene Volokh: "EU-Ministers Considering Arab Demands": Next message: [Volokh] Orin Kerr: What Was Saddam Thinking?: Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] Posted by Eugene Volokh: The Twelve Mohammed Cartoons, in Detail: http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2006_03_05-2006_03_11.shtml#1142035265 One shocking thing about the Mohammed cartoon controversy is how tame many of the cartoons are -- and therefore just how much the cartoons' critics are demanding by arguing that the cartoons ought not be published, or even ought to be outlawed. Here's the dirty dozen, with thanks to Wikipedia (I assume that Wikipedia, being intentionally designed as a public information resource, doesn't mind people's using their bandwidth to serve up the copies): [Jyllands-Posten_Muhammad_drawings.jpg] Bigger images, including translated captions, are available [1]here. (1) The cartoons depict Mohammed, which some Muslims claim is prohibited by Islam (though historically a good deal of Islamic art has depicted Mohammed; the Islamic world has hardly unanimous on this). Fair enough: If you're a Muslim, presumably you can't do this. But to demand that non-Muslims comply with Islamic law is a mighty big demand, much like Orthodox Jews demanding that none of us write the word "God." Thanks, but no thanks: Your sense of what your religion demands doesn't create any obligation, whether legal or moral, on me to go along with your preferences. (2) Some of the cartoons are actually pretty interesting artistically, at least to this observer; the image of Mohammed merged with the green star and crescent, for instance, seems to me an interesting and ingenious composition. The picture of Mohammed in the desert works for me because it humanizes the character, portraying him as a man and not just a symbol. (3) Some of the cartoons have no criticism of Mohammed, of Islam, or of Muslims at all; two (the young schoolteacher and the "PR stunt" one) criticize the newspaper. (4) Some of the cartoons are political commentaries that are pretty clearly criticisms of some strands of modern Islamic culture, but not of Islam generally. The cartoon in which Mohammed is waving off two angry Muslim warriors by saying "Relax guys, it=E2s just a drawing made by some infidel South Jutlander," is a message that true Islam (the teachings of Mohammed) counsels against what some extremist Muslims do in Mohammed's name. The cartoon in which the cartoonist is drawing Mohammed while looking nervously over his shoulder points out -- entirely correctly, as we've learned -- that drawing Mohammed is a perilous activity. (5) Finally, some of the cartoons are indeed cast as criticisms of Islam generally, or of Mohammed generally. The display with the crescents, stars, and Stars of David apparently reads "Prophet, daft and dumb, keeping woman under thumb." Another cartoon depicts Mohammed with a bomb in his turban. Another shows Mohammed telling suicide bombers "Stop, stop, we have run out of virgins!" (referring to the supposed heavenly reward for martyrs) which suggests that Mohammed would endorse the killing of innocents that is modern Muslim suicide bombers' stock in trade. The cartoon that shows a fierce-looking Mohammed with a knife and two veiled women in the background likewise seems like a criticism of Mohammed. (The lineup with Mohammed, Jesus, Buddha, and others strikes me as more a joke than a criticism of the portrayed figures.) These latter items are ones that I as an editor probably would not have published, because I think they're not entirely free. The ones that allude to Muslim violence tar Muslims generally with the sins of particular subgroups of Muslims. The criticism of Muslim treatment of women may be more broadly accurate of a wide range of religious Islamic thought and practice (though not by any means all religious Islamic thought and practice), but seems rhetorically excessive. Yet these sorts of overgeneralizations and rhetorical excesses aimed at historical or religious figures as symbols for a movement are an inevitable part of free debate about ideas. This is especially so for cartoons, slogans, and jokes, which because of their conciseness will almost always oversimplify. It is also so because many of these images are necessarily ambiguous. I do not, for instance, understand the Mohammed with the bomb in his turban as accusing Islam generally; it seems to me to be a condemnation of one particular aspect of Islam -- militant Islam that often centers on murderous violence against those it sees as its enemies. Again, as an editor I would probably have avoided items with this sort of ambiguity; but it is perfectly understandable that other editors would have a different view. To the extent there is a transgression of editorial judgment or good manners here, it is a relatively minor one. Of course I realize that some disagree, and see any even possibly pejorative reference to Mohammed -- or for that matter any depiction of Mohammed -- as a horrible emotional injury. But their subjective feelings, real as they may be to them, are not sufficient reasons for the rest of us to change the way we talk or write. "I'm offended" cannot be justification enough, either in law or in manners, for the conclusion "therefore you must shut up." (Among other things, note that many people are quite understandably offended when others say "I'm offended, therefore you must shut up." If mere offense on some listeners' part is reason enough for the speakers to stop saying, then I take it that those who are offended have an obligation to themselves remain silent.) This is why this issue is so important: Those who demand that the cartoons not be published or republished are cutting at the heart of public debate. They are either demanding that some ideologies not be criticized, or that they be handled with such kid gloves that normal debate about them -- which is inevitably impassioned, given the magnitude of the issues involved -- is practically impossible. This is why the West must resist this pressure to silence, both as a legal matter and as a matter of editorial judgment. References 1. http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons Previous message: [Volokh] Eugene Volokh: "EU-Ministers Considering Arab Demands": Next message: [Volokh] Orin Kerr: What Was Saddam Thinking?: Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] More information about the Volokh mailing list [...]

]]> http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-124273 The Volokh Conspiracy - The Twelve Mohammed Cartoons, in Detail: Mon, 07 May 2007 14:25:26 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/#comment-124273 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Bigger images, including translated captions, are available here. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] Bigger images, including translated captions, are available here. [...]

]]> http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-124046 Kesher Talk: Chomskyite Billionare Pleads Oppression Sun, 06 May 2007 16:55:37 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/#comment-124046 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] [...]

]]> http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-123405 religionsites Thu, 03 May 2007 16:39:38 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/#comment-123405 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] A Selection of Religious Web Sites @ @ @ @ @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ * Renew your Faith & Know about Others * @ @ @ * Who is Jesus? *   *  *  *   * Loving Christ! * @ @ @  * Comprehensive Christianity by Wikipedia * @ @ @   *    A Story of Two Friends and writing in Sand or Stone?   * Packing Your Chute * **  Part of the Body * Inspirational Messages by SkyWriting.Net * *   As the World Turns * Something to think about!  * * Train of Life *    *  *  *    * Simple Prayers * * Forsaked Roots by Mary Jones * * Apple Sauce Kids (ASK) - Free Christian Resources * * * * Inspirational Powerpoint using singing of Birds * * * # # # Cry of the Spirit # # #      # # # Mountain Wings # # # # # # River Songs * Greetings to Friends and Family # # # # # # Reflections for your Journey * Explore Faith # # # * Welcome to Christian Web Site * Best on the Web * @ @ @ Big Mud Puddles & Sunny Yellow Dandelions @ @ @ Bible on the Web      Bible Gateway Search    Blue Letter Bible @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Tom Love               Roman Catholic Web Sites           Spring 2006 02/12/06 @ Click the Play Button on the Audio Console @ [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] A Selection of Religious Web Sites @ @ @ @ @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ * Renew your Faith & Know about Others * @ @ @ * Who is Jesus? * * * * * Loving Christ! * @ @ @ * Comprehensive Christianity by Wikipedia * @ @ @ * A Story of Two Friends and writing in Sand or Stone? * Packing Your Chute * ** Part of the Body * Inspirational Messages by SkyWriting.Net * * As the World Turns * Something to think about! * * Train of Life * * * * * Simple Prayers * * Forsaked Roots by Mary Jones * * Apple Sauce Kids (ASK) - Free Christian Resources * * * * Inspirational Powerpoint using singing of Birds * * * # # # Cry of the Spirit # # # # # # Mountain Wings # # # # # # River Songs * Greetings to Friends and Family # # # # # # Reflections for your Journey * Explore Faith # # # * Welcome to Christian Web Site * Best on the Web * @ @ @ Big Mud Puddles & Sunny Yellow Dandelions @ @ @ Bible on the Web Bible Gateway Search Blue Letter Bible @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Tom Love Roman Catholic Web Sites Spring 2006 02/12/06 @ Click the Play Button on the Audio Console @ [...]

]]> http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-122935 Radical Muslim :: and if you want to call me Homophobic… :: April :: 2007 Tue, 01 May 2007 23:26:31 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/#comment-122935 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Comment by Dennis — April 29, 2007 @ 1:17 am [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] Comment by Dennis — April 29, 2007 @ 1:17 am [...]

]]> http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-79622 Sienna Miller Gets Death Threats from Muslims » Gone Hollywood Thu, 20 Apr 2006 20:10:49 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/#comment-79622 [...] [...] [...] [...]

]]> http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-78912 Comedy Central Censored Mohammed “South Park” » Gone Hollywood Thu, 13 Apr 2006 18:38:20 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/#comment-78912 [...] [...] [...] [...]

]]> http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-78762 Nude Maid Sues Over Indonesian Playboy Hoax » Gone Hollywood Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:17:58 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/#comment-78762 [...] This is a religion where people get murdered for drawing cartoons of Mohammad, so the reaction to Playboy is hardly a surprise. [...] [...] This is a religion where people get murdered for drawing cartoons of Mohammad, so the reaction to Playboy is hardly a surprise. [...]

]]> http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-74954 Negative99 » Maybe I missed it… Tue, 28 Feb 2006 01:30:33 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/#comment-74954 [...] And really, I think I’ve been a bit derelict on not mentioning anything about the insanity going on right now. All over some cartoons. I’m watching Muslim protesters holding signs calling for the death of the cartoonists, the newspaper editors, and all other infidels (foreign or domestic). Should I mention that these people don’t have a particularly peaceful track record? How about the Jewish cartoons that the Islamic press puts out? [mark this day because it ain’t gonna be often that I link to the ADL] [...] [...] And really, I think I’ve been a bit derelict on not mentioning anything about the insanity going on right now. All over some cartoons. I’m watching Muslim protesters holding signs calling for the death of the cartoonists, the newspaper editors, and all other infidels (foreign or domestic). Should I mention that these people don’t have a particularly peaceful track record? How about the Jewish cartoons that the Islamic press puts out? [mark this day because it ain’t gonna be often that I link to the ADL] [...]

]]> http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-74125 Legally Retarded » Blog Archive » What’s the big deal about the cartoons? Sun, 19 Feb 2006 06:44:35 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/#comment-74125 [...] In other news, the cartoons were really funny.  If you haven’t seen them, look at them here:  http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons [...] [...] In other news, the cartoons were really funny.  If you haven’t seen them, look at them here:  http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons [...]

]]> http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-129883 Patrick - MySpace Blog Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/#comment-129883 <!--%kramer-pre%-->I keep hearing a lot of stories in the news lately. Muslims pissed off because of Danish cartoonist who drew some pictures of Muhammad, so they decide to riot, invade an embassy and kill a few people. http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons Then there was the one about Muslims that were pissed off because the Pope read a snippet of 14th century Byzantine text "Dialogue Held With A Certain Persian, the Worthy Mouterizes, in Anakara of Galatia" that pretty much summed up the opinion that<!--%kramer-post%--> I keep hearing a lot of stories in the news lately. Muslims pissed off because of Danish cartoonist who drew some pictures of Muhammad, so they decide to riot, invade an embassy and kill a few people. http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons Then there was the one about Muslims that were pissed off because the Pope read a snippet of 14th century Byzantine text "Dialogue Held With A Certain Persian, the Worthy Mouterizes, in Anakara of Galatia" that pretty much summed up the opinion that

]]> http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-129884 Applied Conservatism Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons/#comment-129884 <!--%kramer-pre%--> The Uproar of a Cartoon <!--%kramer-post%--> The Uproar of a Cartoon

]]>