• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Subscribe
  • RSS

Egyptians Upset With U.S. Response To Crisis

The Obama Administration’s cautious approach to the crisis in Egypt isn’t playing well in the Egyptian streets:

In the streets of Cairo, many protesters are now openly denouncing the United States for supporting President Hosni Mubarak, saying the price has been their freedom. They say the Obama administration has offered only tepid criticism of a regime that has received billions of dollars in U.S. aid.

The United States walks a fine line between a weakened leader and the pro-democracy protesters who could overthrow him. But the prospect of Mubarak being ousted by a movement that feels ignored by the United States raises questions about future relations between Washington and a strategic ally in a volatile region of the world.

“Tell America that we get to choose our president,” Manshawi said. “We choose him, not them.”

(…)

U.S. officials “speak about their own interest, not ours,” said Ahmed Abu Dunia, who said he planned to demonstrate every day until Mubarak is gone. “The Egyptians love Egypt.”

Of course, our own national interests are our primary concern, and they should be. President Obama’s job isn’t to do what’s best for the Egyptian people, it’s to do what is in the interests of the United States. The problem that the U.S. faces, though, is that the public face of our foreign policy for a long time has not been this  cold calculation of interests of realpolitik. For at least a generation, it’s been wrapped up with the rhetoric of “freedom” and “democracy” while at the same time, at it’s base, it is really about advancing and protecting the national interests of the United States and its allies. That means staying silent at times when a popular uprising erupts in some segment of the world, or even staying silent when a government moves to suppress it. Usually, it’s the right decision and intervening would have been the wrong decision, but it creates a disconnect between our rhetoric and reality and that world tends to notice.

Sometimes, its not just the rhetoric they notice:

In a dusty alleyway in downtown Cairo, Gamal Mohammed Manshawi held out a dirty plastic bag Saturday afternoon. Inside were smashed gas canisters and the casings of rubber bullets that he said Egyptian police had fired at anti-government demonstrators.

“You see,” the 50-year-old lawyer said, displaying the items. On the bottom of each were the words “Made in the USA.”

“They are attacking us with American weapons,” he yelled as men gathered around him.

I noted the “Made In the U.S.A.” tear gas issue the other day, and I must say I’m not surprised that Egyptians are noticing. Just like Iranians remembered the coup against Mohammed Mosadegh when the Islamic Revolution came in 1979. It’s called blowback, and it’s real.

As I noted yesterday, Mohammed el-Baradei, who seems to be emerging as a rallying point for the protesters, criticized the U.S. response to the crisis. In an interview on ABC’s This Week today, he repeated that sentiment:

Mohamed ElBaradei, the former head of the International Atomic Enegry Agency and a 2006 Nobel Peace Prize recipient, told ABC’s “This Week” that the people were expecting the U.S. to be on the side of democracy and “let go of a dictator.”

“He’s also saying, I look to the government, you know, i.e., Mubarak, you know, to implement democracy,” ElBaradei said of President Obama’s call for reforms and protecting the rights of the people.

“I mean, to ask a dictator to implement democratic measure after 30 years in power is an oxymoron,” he said. “So they need to let go of [President Hosni] Mubarak. They need to side with the people. They need to go for, you know, transition, smooth transition, through a government of national salvation. This is only way out.”

Public opinion in Egypt about the U.S. is already fairly low. By appearing to side with the government that the people seem to have already rejected as legitimate, we run the risk of destroying whatever chance we might have to influence the future the direction of the country, and that could be very detrimental to our interests.

Related Posts:

About Doug Mataconis
Doug holds a B.A. in Political Science from Rutgers University and J.D. from George Mason University School of Law. He joined the staff of OTB in May, 2010 and also writes at Below The Beltway. Follow Doug on Twitter | Facebook

Comments

  1. mpw280 says:

    There is only blowback against the US, if the weapons were PRC or Russian nobody would give a shit. Only the US is responsible for stuff sold on the open market and used by whomever uses it. If Iran were to use 40 year old F14’s to do something stupid we would be responsible, not Iran. If the teargas was Russian, there is probably also Russian origin munitions being used, nobody would point it out and nobody would care least of all the Russians. How about someone asking the lawyer if he would rather that the Egyptian forces use Russian deadly force weapons or US non-lethal munitions. mpw

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Rock says:

    If they get upset over where the tear gas is made, please don’t tell them those M60A1 or A3 tanks and M113 infantry carriers were made in the USA too. They just might throw a hiss fit over that minor detail.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. michael reynolds says:

    mpw:

    Yeah, there’s a reason for that: we’re the United States of America, and we say we stand for something bigger than just realpolitik. We are held to the standard we ourselves preach. Because believe it or not, a lot of folks around the world still do think we are the great force for freedom and democracy. They still look to us as proof that it’s not just dog-eat-dog.

    You want to stop talking about us being the greatest nation on earth, and talking about American exceptionalism, and holding ourselves up as an example? I don’t. I want to find ways when we can to make all of that real. The price we pay is that people don’t treat us like another China or Russia.

    So quit your whining and be proud that people still expect more of us.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Conversely, you could have titled this post: Americans Upset with U.S. Response to Crisis

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. David says:

    It’s a tough situation on diplomatic relations. Egypt has been a major ally for the US in the Middle East, especially when it comes to the Israel-Palestinian conflict. I don’t know how much of this is truth, but I’ve read a lot that the Muslim Brotherhood is a major force behind these protests. If that is the case, then it can be easy to see just why we might be a little hesitant at first to support these demonstrations.

    theatleeappeal.com

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. […] the Beltway -Egyptians Upset With U.S. Response To Crisis and Egypt and the Limits of US […]

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. Murad Bamatraf says:

    I feel ISLAMIC REVOLUTION starting to take part in the middle-east. This creates more attention to palestine, that a peace state must be established! Israel end will come after here if they don’t accept a two state resolution. Jerussalam is the fuelling anger to all ISLAMIC STATES! Mubarak has’nt helped GAZA at all. He blocked the border for too long, well now freedom to Palestine is on there door step.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0