Explaining Boltonmania
Sean Hackbarth does a pretty good job of explaining the basic appeal of Bolton. Although, I have to wonder how True Believers will react to being compared to Ned Lamont boosters! :)
Related Posts
- None Found
Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs
Sean Hackbarth does a pretty good job of explaining the basic appeal of Bolton. Although, I have to wonder how True Believers will react to being compared to Ned Lamont boosters! :)
About Steven L. Taylor
Steven L. Taylor is a Professor of Political Science at Troy University. His main areas of expertise include parties, elections, and the institutional design of democracies. He is the author of Voting Amid Violence: Electoral Democracy in Colombia and is currently working on a comparative study of the US to 29 other democracies. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of Texas and his BA from the University of California, Irvine. He has been blogging at PoliBlog since 2003.
Follow Steven on Twitter
All Original Content Copyright 2003-2012 by OTB. All Rights Reserved




I like Bolton too. In a body that doesn’t respect the U.S. and is a means for a piddly nation like Namibia or the Sudan to be on par with the U.S. an aggressive ambassador is refreshing.
However, any U.N. ambassador, even Bolton isn’t “vital” to the war (to use the words at Stop the ACLU). Politics is the art of the possible. With Bush’s political capital low he’ll need to spend it on fights that earn him a better return–a federal judge or two for example.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0
0
What is really wonderful about Bolton is Bush used him to explain that the UN is really not America’s Friend, but functions completely in its own self interest; not the interest of sovereign countries.
The future Americans now understand this and it looks like America has a future in the world and dealing with other countries.
Of course he didn’t find WMD per Plame’s instructions, but that’s all CIA.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0
0
Sean,
For what it is worth, were I in the Senate, I would likely vote for Bolton’s confirmation. However, were I President, I wouldn’t waste my time on this fight.
Ultimately that is what this all boils down to.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0
0
Steven, I agree. There are bigger fish. Especially since the U.N. ambassador makes new at most once a year. If Bolton’s the linchpin to winning the war American strategy is really screwed up.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0
0