From the “Sheer Genius” File
·
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
·
Via WSFA: Coach resigns over nude photo on Facebook
Oxford Hills Superintendent Rick Colpitts said Paul Withee apparently meant to send a naked picture of himself to his girlfriend, but accidentally posted the image on his Facebook page.
Withee took down the picture in a matter of minutes, but the damage was done. A student saw the photo and a parent reported it.
Attention humanity: nothing good can come of sending naked pictures of yourself to other people.
About Steven L. Taylor
One wonders why his girlfriend would need a picture
Helpful or Unhelpful:
6 
0
Rule Number One in the 21st Century…Do not put anything into an electronic device that you do not want every single person on the planet to see.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
4 
0
I’ll never understand the urge to send naked photos over cellphones or the Internet.
Receiving them, sure.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
3 
0
Seriously, WTF is this sending nekkid pics of yourself to others? I seriously don’t get it. At all.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
1 
0
@Rob in CT:
Perhaps Anthony Weiner could explain
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
@ Tillman…
Well SOMEONE has to send them!!!
Helpful or Unhelpful:
2 
0
@Tillman:
I’d be careful about that last part of the response.. You never know who will send what.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
@Doug Mataconis: These are the risks of life, I say.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
Tillman has the right of it.
So, by the general tenor of these comments, I’m guessing no one wants pictures of my holiday at the nude beach? Even the ones not of me?
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
I’m going to take the contrarian position here and argue that the coach is being treated unfairly. While it may be dumb to put your naked photo on the internet, it shouldn’t be a firing offense. Everyone seems to agree that it was just an accident based on misunderstanding settings in Facebook, not a deliberate act of exhibitionism.
And I really reject the idea that this has done some kind of harm to the students in that school. They probably just think it’s funny. If you accidentally saw someone naked (say, through an open window) would that cause you actual psychological harm? This is a leftover bit of Puritanism – the idea that “children” (here, high-school-age adolescents) need to be shielded from any knowledge that sex or sexuality exists, as if that were even possible.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
8 
0
I’m with ck.
Grow up. These kids have a little thing called the internet where — so I’m told — there are as many as a dozen naked pictures available.
No harm has been done, except to this guy’s pride and employment prospects. Overreaction.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
7 
0
This situation is more of the “zero tolerance” nonsense that permeates our schools. On the other side, zero tolerance policies make decisions easy–no thinking or evaluation involved. He may have done it “by mistake” but he may have done it because he’s a perv. Always err on the side of “the death penalty.”
Helpful or Unhelpful:
2 
0