Kosola Cover-Up?
TNR’s Jason Zengerle has what he purports to be an email from Markos Moulitsas of Daily Kos to several big name liberal bloggers asking them to starve the story about his and Jerome Armstrong’s alleged blog-for-pay scheme of oxygen by simply ignoring it. The close:
My request to you guys is that you ignore this for now. It would make my life easier if we can confine the story. Then, once Jerome can speak and defend himself, then I’ll go on the offensive (which is when I would file any lawsuits) and anyone can pile on. If any of us blog on this right now, we fuel the story. Let’s starve it of oxygen. And without the “he said, she said” element to the story, you know political journalists are paralyzed into inaction.
So far, it seems to be working in that the left side of the blogosphere has virtually ignored the controversy.
Stirling Newberry says he’s on this email list calls this charge “libel, in the clearest and most legally exacting use of the word.” He “can state for a fact that there has been no coordinated conspiracy to defend Markos. It is true that people who are Markos close supporters have, publicly, urged that the blogsphere strike back at what is clearly a smear. That’s called loyalty and it is an important quantity in politics.” Frankly, I find the juxtaposition of these things confusing. The email is certainly a coordinated effort to silence discussion and the charge is that there has been little effort to defend Markos on the left from some rather serious charges.
Greg Wythe generally thinks the Kos-ola story “a smear” but is angry that Kos is sending out emails telling people to shut up while simultaneously getting angry at being called a “gatekeeper.”
Ann Althouse believes “the underlying story — the one in need of oxygen starvation — is even more disturbing than the notion that seemingly independent bloggers are ‘sheep.’”
Sean-Paul Kelley thinks TNR is “purposefully trying to destroy an icon of progressive politics, especially when he is legally precluded from commenting on the issue.” Which is nonsense. Armstrong is precluded from talking about his SEC plea bargain, not these blogola charges. And Kos has no restrictions whatsoever.
Related Posts
- None Found
About James Joyner
even set up their own blogs, with staffers answering questions, presenting policy proposals and posting campaign literature and videos.†She’s wrong if she thinks she can win over the Kossacks with this move. There’s only one way to do that: Kosola.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
even set up their own blogs, with staffers answering questions, presenting policy proposals and posting campaign literature and videos.†She’s wrong if she thinks she can win over the Kossacks with this move. There’s only one way to do that: Kosola.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
like this were going on on the right, the bloggers of the “Townhouse” list would probably be somewhat less charitable. But remember — it’s not the crime, it’s the cover-up! UPDATE: Ann Althouse: “I wonder who’s the leaker among the elite bloggers.”Outside the Beltway has a roundup, and notes that Stirling Newberry is accusing The New Republic of libel, though his post doesn’t actually say that the email isn’t genuine. (He may want to look here for some libel advice.) He also attributes the story to both “Nasty
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
Outside The Beltway Ann Althouse
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
Or is it just the same influence that prevents conservative blogs from covering Ron Suskind’s new book?
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
There’s been tons of conservative coverage of Suskind’s book, including here. Which is pretty good considering the book isn’t out yet.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
I’m guessing that Armstrong asked Kos to not talk about it and ask others to do the same and Kos agreed as a favor to a friend. Also, Armstrong would look pretty lame denying the blogola charge and then having to say he can’t talk about the other one.
FYI – You mis-typed SEC.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
So if Nixon had sent out a memo asking people to ignore the Watergate story, that wouldn’t be signs of a cover up.
From what I read the implications of the original story is pretty minimal. The implications that the left side of the blogosphere are sheep is staggering. I have heard conservatives talk about Kos being a Rovian plot given his record of loses, his record of funneling money into losing campaigns and his record of pushing the democrats away from the political center. But if they can willingly forgo thought and discussion on as basic a question as credibility, maybe there is something to the idea. It certainly doesn’t look like principles is their motivation.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
i can’t believe SPK is still posting after his little “fib” that he got caught about. regardless of that, he isn’t usually right about anything.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
Kos has spent most of the last three years attacking TNR and the reasonable wing of the Democratic party. He shouldn’t be surprised that, when the worm turns, it bites.
But then, he really is ignorant about the basic facts of political life.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
A deep analysis of the Leftist Mind will reveal an ‘ends justify the means’ belief. Anything can be done to support the cause. Hypocrisy, morals, and even personal safety do not matter.
And regarding Kos bloggers, hell, they even mourn Zarqawi in some cases.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
Mum’s The Word…
Glenn Reynolds still thinks talk of an Armstrong-Kos “pay-for-play scheme” sounds like politics as usual, but in light of the following reminds that trouble is often found in the coverup, not the crime. Are Jerome Armstrong and Markos Moulitsas (of…..
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
Now, did Sean-Paul Kelley actually write that himself?
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
Remember Kos’ pending declaration of war on the DLC, saying than in two weeks they’d make the DLC radioactive? That was posted on August 22, 2005. It seems that Armstrong was hired by the DLC-ite Warner in August, 2005. I wonder what the exact hire date was.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
What Jim said… I’m not sure I’d use Sean-Paul as my authority on blogger ethics. Your mileage may (of course) vary.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
I don’t think Stirling Newberry has the slightest idea what the clearest and most legally-exacting definition of libel is, else he probably wouldn’t be busy making a complete ass of himself by claiming Zengerle’s article is defamatory.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
Now, did Sean-Paul Kelley actually write that himself?
Funniest damn thing I have read in a while. And to think I nearly forgot about that sorry episode!
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
I’ll bet Sean-Paul has been Biden his time hoping that would happen.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
Sheeple On The Left…
When it comes down to it, Kos and the Moonbat left don’t like to “Speak truth to power”, especially when it’s an Inconvenient Truth and the power is the gravy-train of their blogosphere empire….
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
TownHouseGate.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
[...] Outside the Beltway [...]
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
Thereâ??s been tons of conservative coverage of Suskindâ??s book, including here. Which is pretty good considering the book isnâ??t out yet.
I stand partially corrected–Time naturally didn’t lead with the portions embarrassing to the White House.
But the book came out yesterday. I’m 30 pages into it. Same pluses and minuses as Woodward’s books–stenography, not journalism. Suskind’s not writing a history, alas. But if his sources are accurate, which will take some cross-checking, then it’s quite a book.
In related news, the PBS website for that Dark Side feature on Cheney is just teeming with interesting interviews on the CIA, al Qaeda, etc. Guaranteed to absorb an hour of your time, you who care about such things. Site says the show itself will be viewable online come Thursday night.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
Ko$sola or JeromeGate?…
The Blogfather makes the Moonbat Mafiosi an offer they can’t refuse. … Will AllahPundit sleep with the fishes? Other “wingnut bloggers” daring to defy La Blogga Nostra’s code of omerta on Ko$ola/JeromeGate ……
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
Ernst brings up a good point about the then-promised war with the DLC, which the diminutive kos backed off of (hadn’t thought of the Armstrong hiring afterwards angle, though).
I’d be willing to bet that the chances that he goes through with a single libel lawsuit are similar to the actual “war” he was going to wage against the DLC. Some people, based on my experience, get a sudden rush of bravado and testosterone when they’re sitting at their PC.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
Markos Moulitsas Zuñiga (Daily Kos) in good compan…
While it is not the purpose of this post to excuse the actions of Moulitsas Zuñiga and Armstrong Armstrong, I think it important to note that this request for discretion is not unprecedented….
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
[...] Instapundit has a nice roundup of today’s glee by the righteousblogs: Outside the Beltway has a roundup, and notes that Stirling Newberry is accusing The New Republic of libel, though his post doesn’t actually say that the email isn’t genuine. (He may want to look here for some libel advice.) He also attributes the story to both “Nasty Republicans” and “establishment Democrats.” It’s a conspiracy so vast . . . . [...]
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
You mean the one in which he made this bonehead mistake?
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
A Vast Leftwing Konspiracy: “Townhouse” and The DailyKost of Doing Business…
There’s controversy growing about a leaked email from Kos to a squadron of top-ranked leftwing bloggers. In short, we find suggestions of impropriety in practice, as there may have been some “backroom” dealings, a Tammany Hall-style …
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
[...] Outside the Beltway [...]
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
On Siegel on Blogging…
From a post at Lee Siegel on Culture
At the end of my post yesterday, I wrote, “The blogosphere’s fanaticism is, in many ways, the triumph of a lack of focus.”
[…]
All these abusive attempts to autocratically or dictatorially…
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0