Mary McCarthy’s Meteoric Rise
Through a second party, Mary McCarthy has denied that she is the source of the CIA secret prisons/rendition story that won Dana Priest a Pulitizer. She does not deny “inappropriate contact” with Priest and other journalists. I have no strong opinion on this particular, which will sort itself out in due course.
More interesting is an emerging meme in the blogosphere, as seen in Allahpundit‘s much-linked* roundup, is that McCarthy rose to very high levels in the CIA with incredible speed, thus demonstrating her incredible political connectedness. The progenitor of this claim seems to be Spook86, an anonymous blogger who purports to be a retired intelligence officer.
Equally interesting is her meteoric rise within the intelligence community. According to her bio, she joined the CIA as an analyst in 1984. Within seven years, she had rise to a Deputy NIO position, and reached full NIO status by 1994. To reach that level, she literally catapulted over dozens of more senior officers–and I’m guessing that her political connections didn’t hurt. By comparison, I know a current NIO, with a resume and academic credentials more impressive than Ms. McCarthy’s, who reached the position after more than 20 years of extraordinarily distinguished service. McCarthy’s rapid advancement speaks volumes about how the Clinton Administration did business, and sheds new light on the intelligence failures that set the stage for 9-11. We can only wonder how many other political hacks climbed the intel food chain under Clinton–and remain in place to this day.
There’s just one small problem with this argument, however: McCarthy is 62 years old. That means she was roughly 39 years old when hired by the CIA. So, it’s not as if she was an intern hired at the GS-7 level and then magically an NIO in ten years. Indeed, she was a PhD Africa historian with a book and substantial business experience to her name. She might well have entered the Agency as a GS-14 or GS-15.
Jumping to the Senior Intelligence Service in seven years from that level would be impressive but hardly so spectacular as to raise eyebrows. Indeed, by 1994 she was 49 years old. Spook86′s distinguished friend, presuming he started his distinguished career right out of college at 22 or 23, would have been only 42 or 43. If he completed his more-impressive-than-University of Minnesota PhD before entering government service, maybe he was 28 or 29 and thus the same age as McCarthy.
*There’s an advantage in being part of a Michelle Malkin startup, apparently. The site, in operation roughly 24 hours, already has 110,000 plus unique visitors.
Related Posts
- None Found
About James Joyner
ve got answers. Each month my inbox is brimming with great questions from inquiring readers who want to know how to combat spam. This month I answer the most common and puzzling spam questions from theSpam SlayermailbagMary McCarthy s Meteoric Rise Outside Beltway – Through a second party, Mary McCarthy has denied that she is the source of the CIA secret prisons/rendition story that won Dana Priest a Pulitizer. She does not deny inappropriate contact with Priest and other journalists. I have no
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
- A series of terrorist bombings has killed 90 plus people in Dahab, Egypt . One presumes this is the work of al Qaeda, especially in light of yesterday s release of a tape by Osama bin Laden promising to ratchet up the murdering in moderate MuslimMary McCarthy s Meteoric Rise Outside Beltway – Through a second party, Mary McCarthy has denied that she is the source of the CIA secret prisons/rendition story that won Dana Priest a Pulitizer. She does not deny inappropriate contact with Priest and other journalists. I have no
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
Outside the Beltway | 4/22/2006 11:50:16 Much more news has come out about yesterday’s firing of a CIA officer for leaking classified secrets to the press. The NYT reports her name, duty…Mary McCarthy’s Meteoric Rise
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
Considering the political hacks that have advanced through the Bush administration, I would say this sheds more light on how politicians in general conduct business.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
So many punchlines…
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
McCarthy’s Mess…
…nothing is simple when it comes to the CIA, leaks, and politics….
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
Deputy NIOs are mostly GS-15 types. Not exactly unheard of for someone to make it to that grade in seven years, especially if she came in as a 13 or 14. I hate to say it, but it does help to be a woman, especially during the Clinton years. I don’t really have feelings either way about that, if she was qualified (and I think she probably was), she deserved to have the job.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
First the conservative blogosphere trashes McCarthy’s reputation because of allegations that she leaked information embarrassing to the Bush Administration.
Then, when Ms. McCarthy’s lawyer disputes the claim and it becomes clear there is no basis for that claim, the conservative blogosphere changes gear and trashes McCarthy’s as a political hack.
Typical.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
Um, isn’t Spook86 missing the obvious here? Namely, who was President during the bulk of McCarthy’s years with the CIA in the time period he discusses? Joined in 1984, and made full NIO status in 1994. Reagan/Bush I were president from the time she joined until January 1993, which encompasses the 7 years that it took her to “rise to a Deputy NIO position.” Clinton was President for, at most, two years of her tenure during this period.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
I’m rather curious about Spook86′s grasp of time. If McCarthy joined the CIA in 1984, and rose to Deputy NIO “within seven years,” that means the vast majority of her “meteoric rise” occurred prior to 1991 – during the era of Reagan and Bush senior.
Apparently, “how the Clinton Administration did business” was with a time machine…
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
Dangit Ugh! Stop pressing that button! :-)
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
[...] Outside The Beltway | OTB on April 25th, 2006 [...]
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
Overlooking the timeframe provides a perfect example of neo-con paranoia re Clinton. Everything’s Bill’s fault, from the Bush recession, to the piss-poor Bush handling of the terrorist chatter culminating in 9/11, and now even things that occurred before Clinton was Pres. The neo-cons understand the beauty of paranoia–it all makes sense. Clinton! Aaaaaagh!
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0