• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Subscribe
  • RSS

RECRUTING AND MORALE

Tom Bevan notes that despite all the hubbub over low troop morale and constant bad news about soldiers getting killed in Iraq, military recruiting is steady or even up. (Many links on all this.)

Very interesting indeed. I’m guessing two things explain this: First, contrary to the myth that people join the military primarily for college benefits and whatnot, the fact is that young men are attracted to the service at least partly out of a sense of adventure and wanting to be part of something important. Recruiting was difficult during the 1970s and 1980s at least partly because being a soldier meant a lot of boring garrison duty. Second, given the downsizing of our force in the Cold War aftermath, the recruitment targets are rather low, so the quotas are likely going to be filled regardless. When the economy is booming and other variables make joining the military less appealing, the applicant pool is smaller and recruiters are less picky. (A little overweight? No high school diploma? Smoked a little weed three years ago? We can grant you a waiver!) If people are lining up outside the recruiting office, the reverse is true.

(BTW, I keep forgetting that RealClear politics has a weblog in addition to a clipping service for op-eds.)

Related Posts

  • None Found

About James Joyner
James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. Follow James on Twitter.

Comments

  1. Steven says:

    They don’t ping, so while I had it my blogroll (I may still, for that matter), I therefore forget to read it.

    Helpful or Unhelpful: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. James Joyner says:

    There’s a lot of that going around, to be sure.

    Helpful or Unhelpful: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0