• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Subscribe
  • RSS

Reuters Recalls Fake Beirut Photo After Exposed by Blogs

Reuters has recalled an “altered” photograph hours after coming under assault from the blogosphere.

A Reuters photograph of smoke rising from buildings in Beirut has been withdrawn after coming under attack by American web logs. The blogs accused Reuters of distorting the photograph to include more smoke and damage.

The photograph showed two very heavy plumes of black smoke billowing from buildings in Beirut after an Air Force attack on the Lebanese capital. Reuters has since withdrawn the photograph from its website, along a message admitting that the image was distorted, and an apology to editors.

Reuters Recalls Fake Beirut Photo After Exposed by Blogs

In the message, Reuters said that “photo editing software was improperly used on this image. A corrected version will immediately follow this advisory. We are sorry for any inconvience.”

Reuters Recalls Fake Beirut Photo After Exposed by Blogs Announcment

Earlier, Charles Johnson, of the Little Green Footballs blog , which has exposed a previous attempt at fraud by a major American news corporation, wrote : “This Reuters photograph shows blatant evidence of manipulation. Notice the repeating patterns in the smoke; this is almost certainly caused by using the Photoshop “clone” tool to add more smoke to the image.”

Take one night off from blogging to fight a cold and all hell breaks loose. . . .

Charles Johnson, Rob @ Left and Right, Michelle Malkin, Ace, and AllahPundit are among those who got on this one early and all provide excellent roundups of the photos, evidence, and blog coverage. Johnson, Rob, and Allah, especially, dug up most of the evidence.

Updated to include the image of the “picture kill” memo itself.

UPDATE: Rusty Shackleford and Jeff Harrell have excellent rundowns of photographer Adnan Hajj’s rather checkered history.

UPDATE: Rusty catches Hajj in yet another photoshopping.

Reuters has announced that it will not use any more of Hajj’s photos. (Contrary to some reports, he hasn’t been “fired.” Stringers can’t be fired, since they’re not employed.)

Ed Driscoll has a retrospective on how Reuters changed from the world’s most respected wire service to its present unreliable state.

Related Posts:

  • None Found

About James Joyner
James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway, an associate professor of security studies at the Marine Corps Command and Staff College, and a nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer and Desert Storm vet. He has a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. Views expressed here are his own. Follow James on Twitter.

Comments

  1. GINA COBB says:

    , WuzzaDem, neo-neocon, Blogs for Bush, Daled Amos, Right Wing Nut House, Blinq, Gates of Vienna, The Shape of Days, Iowa Voice, The Jawa Report, An Unsealed Room, The Indepundit, Liberty and Justice, Outside The Beltway, Moonbattery, Soccer Dad, Jihad Watch, Jay Currie, The Strata-Sphere, NewsBusters.org, Roger L. Simon, The Coalition of the Swilling, Donklephant, Atlas Shrugs, Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler, Secular Blasphemy

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. PunditGuy says:

    Reuters Photojournalist Awarded a Pink Slip Fake a photo, get fired. If you take pictures for a major media organization and you own a copy of Adobe Photoshop, Charles Johnson is watchin’ you. UPDATE: Reuters withdraws all photos from photographer. Posted by Bill at 03:38 PM | TrackBack (0)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. beyond the shameful Reuters photo editing mess, and wonders where Kofi Annan is to denounce Hizbullah for injuring three Chinese UNIFIL observers in an attack on a UNIFIL position. Others laying the smackdown on Reuters: Stop the ACLU, Jeff Goldstein, Outside the Beltway, Vast Right Wing Conspiracy. UPDATE: Rusty at the Jawa Report notes some other questionable photos from Adnan Hajj. Reuters suspended Hajj. What does it take to fire someone over there anyways? EU Referendum

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. As you can imagine this was the subject of much talk on the blogosphere yesterday. Michelle Malkin, Captain’s Quarters, Don Surber(Who asks how do you recall a newspaper), Beth at MVRWC and James Joyner at OTB were just a few of those commenting. Reuters deserves today’s award, they just aren’t the first news agency to stage photos. Anyone remember this New York Times photo op? This isn’t Reuters first knucklehead award either. Click

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. I would expect that others throughout the blogosphere will do the same. There is absolutely no doubt that Reuters cannot be trusted. The question is: will anyone hold them accountable? More at: NoisyRoom.net, Sister Toldjah (another), Outside the Beltway (another), Hot Air (another and another), Michelle Malkin (another), A Blog for All, Flopping Aces, Iowa Voice, Assorted Babble, Rightwinged, Don Surber , Protein Wisdom, Pajamas Media, The JAWA Report

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. just me says:

    Seems like the MSM has had a lot of “software” mistakes when it comes to pictures they choose to publish.

    I am not sure how you mistakenly add extra black smoke and damage though.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. Photoshopping The News – Reuters Blows Smoke Up Our……

    Partially cross-posted at Expose the Left *****UPDATE***** Reuters has put out a “corrected” version of the image, but still crediting Hajj. SCROLL to the bottom of this post for the image and the caption, on how Reuters issued a “kill”……

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  8. James Joyner says:

    Oh, I’m sure someone intentionally PhotoShopped the image for drammatic effect. Reuters is claiming, presumably, that it was done without knowledge of the editorial staff. So, either the photog, Hajj, did it or there’s an intermediate photo editor who “cleans up” the photos who used his artistic license here. Or, Reuters is lying.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  9. Don Surber says:

    Reuters caught lyin’ again…

    UPDATE: Reuters has recalled the photo. Outside the Beltway has the particulars. Little Green Footballs and others blew the whistle on Reuters.
    Question: How do you recall a newspaper? Once in print, well, it is kinda hard to erase a doctored photo……

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  10. don surber says:

    Guys, it has been worst in the past, long before there were computers. And by copy editors!
    One photographer told me of taking pictures of a fire. To get the image the copy editor wanted, he cut two phots and mashed them together
    Thus the same fireman was in the same picture twice

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  11. Blowing Smoke…

    …And buildings appearing by the sheer will of Allah! Or is it David Blaine? Anyway, for those of you who haven't been following the Reuter's Adnan Hajj doctored photo, er, dustup, Charles Johnson -- who broke the story -- co…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  12. REUTERGATE!…

    Disgrace of the Mainstream Media: Reuters admits doctoring its own war photo of Beirut. In an apology that should cast serious doubt on much of the credibility of the news service itself, Reuters has acknowledged that its war photography……

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  13. Old War Dogs says:

    Reutergate — Continuing Coverage…

    … I’m going to need clearer information to reach any firm conclusion, but looking at the other image in that Y-Net article I’m not at all certain Reuters didn’t turn right around and re-issue a cleaned up version of the same PhotoShop.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  14. Chimpy says:

    I can’t believe anyone fell for this attempt by Chuckles the Clown to bash the MSM.
    Here is the link to the site CJ got the info and images from.
    http://www.leftandright.us/index.php/site/reuters_faking_photos/

    Read my analysis and take a look at the images again.

    In this small 4.5 x 3 inch(my screen@1024×768) photo the right hand column of smoke appears cloned but not when blown up. On the original photo right click and select “save image as” to your desktop so you can find it. It’s called “reutersfake.bmp”. Open with a pic viewer and increase magnification to 200%, 300% and 400%. You will see that the patterns in the 2 columns of smoke do not repeat, are not the same or cloned. It is a coincidence that happens also with clouds and is magnified because of the small image. Fine detail is lost.

    And you are being faked out by the second photo which is a 2 frame animated gif image. This is the image that was fraudulently manipulated and not the original. The second, “sharpened” frame is actually cloned from another area of the pic by the person that produced this animated gif image.

    Look at the second frame of the gif image which has a supposed sharpened version of that area in the original. When sharpened, look at the building that slopes down on the left hand side, in the extreme bottom right corner of the sharpened area. It looks like the same building just slightly to the left at the bottom of the original. In the original that area is a blur and when sharpened the brights and darks don’t mach up. Now look above the spot of that sloped building in the original, and notice the bright building above, lining up with the right side of that building with the slope. Look at the brightness of that building in the original and how that building disappears in the sharpened version. That building should also be sharper and brighter. It shouldn’t just disappear altogether. When sharpened you can still make out the extreme right side of that building in the original area out side the sharpened area. But in the sharpened portion 90% of that building is missing.

    The building to the left of the building with the slope is suspect. On the back of the right side at the roof of that building see how the bright spot appears and disappears, ditto for the bright spot 1 floor down the building from roof area bright spot. If you sharpen, bright areas get brighter and dark areas get darker.
    Also this building is shifting slightly left and right between the 2 frames. Put your curser on an edge to see this shift.

    Granted this building looks similar to the one below and to the left in the original. Have you ever seen pics of Cabrini Green housing complex in Chicago. Row after row of the same buildings. There are buildings in any big city in the US that are exactly the same built by the same developer. Back in the early 80’s when the USS New Jersey was shelling the Muslim section of Beirut the pics of the area bombed looked like Cabrini Green only on a hillside. If this is repeated clones the building that slopes off to the left should have as much detail as the building to it’s left, in the original, because it is so bright. And that disappearing building should show below. But you only see that building once in the original

    Now look at the bottom left corner of the second “sharpened image and look how the smoke just disappears from the original. In that area of the second “sharpened frame, you see a building with no smoke in front of the top of that building like there should be, sharpened or not.

    Look at the left had column of smoke. In the original it is contiguous. In the sharpened frame it is separated on the right side and you can see through it. Also notice how the edges of the smoke shift in the second “sharpened” frame. Notice the shape of the smoke, that touches the left edge of the pic, rising from the buildings in the bottom left corner. Then look at the smoke at the top left of the sharpened image. Notice how the shape changes. And in the sharpened frame it looks exactly like the smoke I mentioned before at the bottom that’s touching the left edge of the pic.

    If you look hard you will see a few other tell tale signs of manipulation of the published original.

    Looking at this animated gif produce by the propagandist, my image viewer shows the masked area that was copied by this person.

    The propagandist copied the buildings from the bottom left of the pic and pasted (cloned) them higher and to the right. Then they reduced the size to make it proportional for the further distance were it was pasted. Then used the blur tool on the clone that they pasted.

    People will do anything or believe anything that advances the “dishonest” MSM meme.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  15. Reuters Predicts Lamont Victory (Satire)…

    Eager to put the embarrassment of Reutergate behind them, Reuters’ Art Department has shifted today’s news focus, by officially predicting victory for Democratic challenger Ned Lamont in Connecticut’s U.S. Senate primary, citing the follow photograp…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  16. likwidshoe says:

    Chimpy – Reuters has admitted that the photo is fake.

    You can stop spamming your ridiculous and insulting diatribe now.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  17. The Latest MSM Doctored Photo…

    All in all, just another day with the biased MSM trying to make news rather then cover the news. Pathetic and sad.

    ……

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  18. Rob@L&R says:

    Sorry, Chimpy…

    I did NO ‘sharpening’ of the photo.

    I resized the image and cropped to the lower-left corner, then copied that portion of the photo that looked like it repeated and pasted it over the repeated area as a new layer.

    So, both rectangles are the exact same part of the image, only the top rectangle has been moved over the part where the clone was applied.

    WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT WAS DONE TO ENHANCE THE IMAGE THAT REUTERS PUBLISHED.

    The only ‘enhancement’ I made was to make the top layer a little less opaque.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  19. RJN says:

    The unphotoshopped version looks bad enough. Why bother to fake it up?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  20. SgtFluffy says:

    Since the advent of the Photoshop world, I rarely believe any photo I see. Hell I was sadened after I learned the phot taken of the Marines planting the Flag on Iwo Jima was staged and the photos and videos of McArthur coming ashore on the Phillipines was taken over and over. A phot can say at times more than what words ever could.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  21. Anderson says:

    Excellent work by LGF. (I so rarely get to say that.)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  22. walter66 says:

    if it’s good enough for Ohio Senator Mike DeWine to doctor photographs…………….

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  23. When will they learn……

    When will the mainstream media learn… You go up against the conservative war machine, and you don’t have your facts right, or play fast and lose with them… YOU LOSE! Game, set, match Mofo, and they will pile on: Cox……

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  24. Bithead says:

    The unphotoshopped version looks bad enough. Why bother to fake it up?

    You have just hit on the central reason why this story is important.

    Go out and look again at the pictures in question.

    Now consider what these pictures are supposed to represent. These are pictures of Qana, after an Israeli bombardment. Notice how in the un-doctored photo there is only one point source of smoke. Note in the picture that got pulled there are several point sources and much more of the smoke. The heavier smoke along with multiple point sources suggesta more devastating bombing by Israel, As opposed to the more surgical strike represented by the un-doctored photo.

    I agree that there is no particular value to Hezbollah or two Israel from a direct military standpoint to pass along the implication that the attack against Hezbollah positions was far more intensive than it really was.

    However, consider that Israel has been going to great pains to bomb targets occupied by Hezbollah forces. They have been struggling mightily to minimize civilian casualties. This job is made Harter, of course, by Hasbro laws habit of mixing itself in with the population. However Israel has at least been trying and to some degree have been successful.

    So along comes this photo… reportedly genuine, showing not a single point source of smoke and thereby a single bomb site, but multiple points of smoke and far more of it. indicating indiscriminate bombing.

    I suggest that the only group that would benefit from Israel’s attacks being miscast as indiscriminate would be Hezbollah. Not, mind you, from a military standpoint, but from a propaganda standpoint. The importance of propaganda can not be underestimated. As I said at my place about a week back:

    …the fact of the matter is the outcome of this war… our survival or not, depends as much on public opinion, as it does on boots on the ground. Indeed; in some ways, the war depends more on public opinion. Consider once again Vietnam. The North was weeks from folding, by the admission of their former commanders. What won the war there for them? Public opinion here at home.

    I said at the time, and I cited examples where the press had been used against us. Both in Vietnam, and in the current situation. Propaganda is a lesson that Hezbollah has learned well. Indeed, they hold it to be the only way they’re going to win anything at all of this conflict. They certainly do not have the wherewithal to win militarily on any front with Israel. However, given enough propaganda of the sort we’ve just witnessed, they hope to sway public opinion against the elimination of Hezbollah by Israel and the rest of the world. And, they seek to paint Israel has the aggressor.

    So with this, we have two points;

    # The value of propaganda to the enemy.

    # They seem to be taking the value of that propaganda far more seriously than we…. since nobody in here has figured out what purpsoe this fake would serve.

    And as an added bonus, we have a practical example of Bloggers jumping all over the faked photos, and countering the false propaganda put out by what I take to be a Hezbollah supporter. Since the press is falling down o the job, it’s up to the bloggers, I fear, to counter this propaganda effort of our enemy.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  25. anjin-san says:

    Whatever happened, it is very amateurish photoshop work, the cloning patterns are very obvious.

    Before we get too preachy about the devious nature of the “MSM”, it might be a good time to remember that the Bush ’04 campaign used doctored campaign photos that were photoshopped.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  26. [...] Me figuro que se habrán enterado por LGF, Barcepundit, Bilbaopundit, Desde Sefarad, Pajamas Media, Ace of Spades, Honest Reporting, The Jawa Report, Blinq, Riehl World View, Flopping Aces, Gateway Pundit, Jihad Watch, Ed Driscoll.com, A Blog For All, Samizdata.net, EU Referendum, WILLisms.com, NewsBusters.org, Captain’s Quarters, The Muqata جÙ, RightWinged.com, Judeoscope, Outside The Beltway, Jay Currie, Atlas Shrugs, The Corner, Power Line, Secular Blasphemy, Macsmind, Daimnation!, Israel Matzav, Patterico’s Pontifications, Michelle Malkin, Noticias de Eurabia, y otras bitácoras que me dejo en el tintero, a Reuters le ha dado por realizar periodismo “creativo” con el caso de Israel. No es que sea la primera vez pero esta vez su manipulación con el Photoshop ha sido demasiado evidente. [...]

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  27. Bithead says:

    Even assuming what you’re saying is correct, there’s a major difference between an advocate within a particular political campaign using doctored photographs and the news agency doing that. You would expect the campaign to be biased courts their candidate. You would not however it’s packed it from a supposedly news agency.

    To even contemplate putting the two on the same scale is reprehensible.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  28. The Knucklehead of the Day award…

    Today’s winner is the News agency Reuters….

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  29. walter66 says:

    btw Bithead…….that’s REPUBLICAN Senator Mike DeWine from Ohio.

    so let me get this straight….in your opinion the media has to be honest where politicians don’t? So honesty is kind of a selective thing for you…..right?

    honesty is the ALWAYS the best policy…..that’s reprehensible?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  30. Bithead says:

    So, you’re suggesting that supposedly faked photos in a purely domestic political campaign, equate to covert support of Hezbolah, an enemy sworn to our destruction are equal?

    You’ll pardon me if I don’t join you.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  31. Daily Summary…

    NEWS: – White House pushes for U.N. resolution – Rice Rejects Notion of Invading Cuba – Official: Castro will return to work – BP shuts down largest U.S. oil field – Hizbullah Fundraising in America? – Inside the New Hizbullah……

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  32. Reuters Busted by US Blogs on Picture Fraud…

    Just how many lies are out there that sparked international demonstrations over Qana?Now The Jawa Report exposes another fake photo from Reuters….

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  33. walter66 says:

    I condemn both Rueters and Senator Mike DeWine for their lack of honesty…….you, on the other hand practice selective honesty

    they are both wrong……aren’t they?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  34. just me says:

    Walter I disagree with you.

    While I think politicians using photoshopped photos isn’t honest, you kind of expect politicians to play the snow job game to an extent. The intent is to get you to vote for them. Is it wrong-yes, if the photo is done to convey a falsehood, but you expect politicians to lack neutrality in a campaign.

    But a news photo, is a news photo, designed to convey what is really happening-news by definition should convey the realities and the truths of what it is covering. If photoshopped photos are used, and the photoshopping changes what the picture is showing (ie playing with contrast or something, can bother me-as in the case of the OJ Simpson magazine covers-but it isn’t changing the story in the photo). Photos tell a story, and when the story is supposed to be unbiased and neutral news, the story shouldn’t be a lie from the beginning.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  35. LJD says:

    No selective honesty, just the ability to differentiate between reality and fiction. Clearly, the Senator was not trying to influence facts with the doctored images.

    If this was Democrat, we’d be hearing about how it was done out of respect for the 9/11 families…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  36. [...] LGF, Barcepundit, Bilbaopundit, Desde Sefarad, Pajamas Media, Ace of Spades, Honest Reporting, The Jawa Report, Blinq, Riehl World View, Flopping Aces, Gateway Pundit, Jihad Watch, Ed Driscoll.com, A Blog For All, Samizdata.net, EU Referendum, WILLisms.com, NewsBusters.org, Captain’s Quarters, The Muqata جÙ, RightWinged.com, Judeoscope, Outside The Beltway, Jay Currie, Atlas Shrugs, The Corner, Power Line, Secular Blasphemy, Macsmind, Daimnation!, Israel Matzav, Patterico’s Pontifications, Michelle Malkin, Noticias de Eurabia. [...]

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  37. ReutersGate…

    The Volokh Conspiracy, Neo-neocon, WuzzaDem, Flopping Aces, Blogs for Bush, Captain’s Quarters, Right Wing Nut House, Gates of Vienna, Iowa Voice, Outside The Beltway, The Jawa Report, Ace of Spades HQ, Roger Ailes, The Indepundit, Liberty and Justic….

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  38. anjin-san says:

    Bithead,

    If you support the Bush campaign’s using faked images of the brave men & women who defend our country for purely political gain, I suppose that is your right. Some would call it reprehensible.

    I would hope the commander in chief would have more respect for those who serve under him, but that’s just me.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  39. [...] Sister Toldjah (another), Outside the Beltway (another) [...]

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  40. walter66 says:

    looks like my comment about Army Ranger Pat Tillman and how his death was used by the republicans to manipulate America got deleted

    Editor’s note: Yep. Per the site comment policy, I deleted a probable thread-jacking comment that is not only off-topic but contained unsubstantiated slurs against the United States military.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0