• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Subscribe
  • RSS

Steroids for the Brain?

Michael Mandel asks a provocative question apropos the continuing controversy about Barry Bonds being on the Juice,

[W]ould we be quite so horrified, I wonder, if we were talking about “smart pills” or memory pills instead of steroids? Suppose that a pharmaceutical company was selling a pill that would improve your memory by 30% or your IQ by 30%, with the same sort of side effects as steroids. Would you be willing to take them for 3 or 5 critical years in your career? What if you knew that everyone else was taking them? What if you knew that the Chinese or the French were taking them? And would you be willing to give your kids these pills in, say, the junior year of high school, to increase the odds of getting a good score on the SAT?

A fair question. If, indeed, they came “with the same sort of side effects as steroids” I would not. Would I have in my teens and early 20s under that sort of pressure? Maybe.

Hat tip: Virginia Postrel

crosspost to OTB Sports

Related Posts:

  • None Found

About James Joyner
James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway, an associate professor of security studies at the Marine Corps Command and Staff College, and a nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer and Desert Storm vet. He has a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. Views expressed here are his own. Follow James on Twitter.

Comments

  1. [...] Steroids for the Brain? [...]

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. akdfjo says:

    After hearing his pathetic explanation for invading Iraq (“The Taliban provided safe haven for al Qaeda. That’s where al Qaeda trained”), I would demand that Bush take a mega-dose of those pills immediately!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. legion says:

    Here’s an important question to chew on as well… Would we reward our most intelligent young adults with multi-million dollar contracts before they’re old enough to drink? Or with full-ride scholarships at the most prestigious universities? (I know there are academic scholarships, but I suspect most schools’ athletic funding far outstrips that given for academics – at least at the undergrad level). Not to mention the general societal influence – a vast amount of that pressure to perform athletically comes from parents who want little Johhny to grow up & be a superstar. Not many parents press their kids to grow up & win the Nobel Prize…

    And on a side note, would this mean that they’d have to put little ‘*’s next to the Nobels given to people who won them while on the brain ‘roids?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. McGehee says:

    And on a side note, would this mean that they�d have to put little �*�s next to the Nobels given to people who won them while on the brain �roids?

    LOL. I assume you’re talking about the non-“Peace” Nobels, right? You know, the ones that have already earned their asterisks in the last 15 years or so?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. John Burgess says:

    I suspect college students would opt for the “brain-‘roids”. When I was in school, exam time was big business for those selling speed. Week-long cram sessions were fairly typical, with little sleep throughout the week. And you could usually count on a couple of people bouncing off the walls as they suffered melt-down in the middle of the exam period.

    Sort of “I’ll only do it until I need glasses.”

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0