• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • RSS

STUPID POLLS

Drudge links a rather silly FOX News poll which reports that President Bush would defeat Bill Clinton 53 percent to 32 percent if the election were held today (and if popular votes rather than electoral votes mattered). I find this amusing but not all that instructive, especially given Clinton’s legendary campaigning skills and that he’s been out of the limelight for all but the most diehard political junkies for two years now.

And the same poll finds a remarkable percentage of respondents who had “never heard of” several of the Democratic challengers: Dennis Kucinich (70%), Howard Dean (56%), Carol Moseley Braun (54%), and John Edwards (49%).

Related Posts

  • None Found

About James Joyner
James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and young daughter. Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg

Comments

  1. Ursula says:

    One word about that poll from our most Fair & Balanced News Station: Propaganda!

  2. Paul says:

    Fox pays Opinion Dynamic to run the poll so calling it propagada is just silly.

    It was on obvious poll to run. Clinton mouthed off and said he wanted to run again for President. He sorta asked for this poll to be run.

    While I think you are right James that Clinton is “out of sight and out of mind” it is probably also true that the “Clinton spell” is wearing off.

    A fair amount of it was gone by 9/12/2001.

    I don’t know if it was that poll or another one but one poll said that only 20% of the people wanted Clinton to run.

    Historically, Clinton has ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS had that same 20%. When Hillary tried to take over healthcare and Newt came in, Clinton polled at 20%. When during Monica they asked if Clinton was an honest person that same 20% said he was. That is his “yellow dog” (if delusional) base.

    Paul

Trackbacks

  1. CalPundit says:

    Historic Matchups
    HISTORIC MATCHUPS….Outside the Beltway links to a poll from Fox News saying that in a hypothetical presidential contest George W. Bush would defeat Bill Clinton 53% to 32%. Why conduct such a silly survey? Because Clinton recently said he thought…

  2. Survey Says — Who Cares?
    Via Outside the Beltway, a silly poll from Fox News on how, if he ran today, Bill Clinton would lose

  3. PoliBlog says:

    More Silly Polls
    James of OTB had the Bill v. Dubya poll numbers last week, now ABC news tries Hill v. Dubya:But among the broader public she trails by 24 points in a head-to-head general election matchup against President Bush, 58 percent to…

Editor's Picks

McCain+Palin+Hold+Campaign+Rally+Pennsylvania+6vSwIe36Dk9l2-570x425

Despite Successful Endorsements, Palin’s Own Prospects Remain Dim

Doug Mataconis

Sarah Palin has done pretty well at helping Republicans win primaries this year, but her own political popularity isn’t any better than it was after she left office last year.

Read the Article
78 Comments
beckrally

The Politics of Crowd Estimates

Steven L. Taylor

Glenn Beck’s “Restoring Honor” rally raises, yet again, the tiresome fight over crowd estimates and their political significance.

Read the Article
53 Comments
rotc-logo

Geography and the American Military

James Joyner

The Army and its officer corps are becoming increasingly Southern and rural. Is this a bad thing? If so, what can we do about it?

Read the Article
38 Comments
constitution-preamble-quill-pen1-570x378

Repeal the 17th Amendment?

Steven L. Taylor

Why would returning to the system of allowing state legislatures to choose Senators improve representation?

Read the Article
56 Comments
Ground Zero Mosque Protest Sensitivity Goes Both Ways

Mosque Opponents: Bigots, Opportunists, and Krauthammer

James Joyner

The only reasons Michael Kinsley can conjure for opposing the Park51 project are bigotry and political opportunism. Unless you’re a really smart columnist.

Read the Article
49 Comments