• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Subscribe
  • RSS

TCS: Applying Free Market Logic to an Unfree Market

My latest Tech Central Station piece, “Applying Free Market Logic to an Unfree Market,” tackles the D.C. baseball stadium fiasco.

The upshot:

While libertarians rightly bemoan the notion of forcing taxpayers to subsidize wealthy team owners, they should understand that the market works both ways. If sports leagues have the leverage to demand public financing of stadia as a precondition for moving a franchise to a city, they would be foolish not to use it.

Luring a professional sports team is difficult and generally not economically smart. It is rather galling that the vast majority of a town’s residents who will never attend a game are forced to pay for the privilege of added traffic congestion. Nonetheless, there are plenty of cities out there begging for a team. Public subsidies for arenas are the cost of playing.

Lots of linkage and analysis in the piece.

Related Posts

  • None Found

About James Joyner
James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. Follow James on Twitter.

Comments

  1. SportsBlog says:

    TCS: DC Stadium Fiasco
    My latest Tech Central Station piece, “Applying Free Market Logic to an Unfree Market,” tackles the D.C. stadium fiasco. The upshot: While libertarians rightly bemoan the notion of forcing taxpayers to subsidize wealthy team owners, they should under…

    Helpful or Unhelpful: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Bithead says:

    What the peice… and the libertarians, seem to miss is the huge amount of busiensses and the tax revenue they bring to an area when a Stadium goes up, by and large.

    Witness, as an example the Southtowns of Buffalo, where the Bills’ stadium is.

    OTOH, when the stadium is used to rebuild an area of town… say, as it was in the case of Baltimore, or here in Rochester, the results are not nearly as good, nor long lasting.

    Helpful or Unhelpful: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. KipEsquire says:

    If sports leagues have the leverage to demand public financing of stadia as a precondition for moving a franchise to a city, they would be foolish not to use it.

    You have it exactly backwards — it’s the very fact that the teams have no economic leverage whatsoever that compels them to rely instead on political leverage and campaigns of ignoring (or distorting) the economic realities of stadium finance, which are never on their side.

    Helpful or Unhelpful: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. “Buy Me Some Peanuts and…a $432.5MM Stadium”
    If the stadium has to rely on such ephemeral, de minimus selling points as “increased rooting,” then that’s a pretty clear sign that the project, qua public undertaking, is destined to be a dud.

    Helpful or Unhelpful: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. James Joyner says:

    Well, no. Demand is a key variable to markets–and it’s an economic variable. It’s no different than Brioni being able to charge $4000 for a $500 suit because people are label snobs.

    Helpful or Unhelpful: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0