• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Subscribe
  • RSS

Virginia GOP Picks Ed Gillespie To Run Against Mark Warner

Ed Gillespie Mark Warner

After a 2013 election cycle in which they saw a trio of candidates with ties to the far right go down to defeat, Virginia Republicans decided to go in a different direction when they met in Roanoke yesterday to pick a candidate to run against Senator Mark Warner:

ROANOKE — In a victory for establishment Republicans, political strategist and former lobbyist Ed Gillespie handily secured the GOP nomination at the party’s state convention Saturday, winning the chance to face Sen. Mark R. Warner (D-Va.) in the general election.

The vote reflected the party’s desire to coalesce around a candidate with wide appeal and the best chance of unseating Warner, a popular former governor and one-term senator.

Gillespie is a favorite of donors and party insiders, yet he has also won over many tea party-influenced conservatives who last year chose candidates who struggled to appeal to Virginia’s changing electorate.

Now the one-time Republican National Committee chairman turns his attention to an uphill battle against Warner, who already has a huge leg up in fundraising and name recognition. But in a year when Democrats are vulnerable and the GOP is hoping to retake the Senate, the race will draw attention and money from across the country.

“We have come into this hall through different doors, but we will leave this hall through one Republican door united in our principles to defeat Mark Warner and take back the Senate,” Gillespie said during his convention speech, bringing much of the crowd to its feet. “I will take your fight to Mark Warner, I will lead us to victory in the fall and we can turn our great country around again.”

(…)

Virginia Republicans — still smarting from the loss of all three statewide races on the ballot last year — came to Saturday’s convention with winning on their minds.

Gillespie’s leading rival, retired Air Force pilot Shak Hill, conceded before all the votes were counted, allowing the convention to nominate Gillespie by acclamation. Gillespie was leading by over 60 percent with about 90 percent of the votes counted, and he touted his rivals’ concession as a show of unity in an often-fractious party.

The outcome was a disappointment to some conservatives.

“I really think Gillespie is a Washington insider and lobbyist,” said Rosanne Reddin, a retired teacher from Williamsburg who wore a homemade T-shirt that read, “We need Shak on the Hill.” “Voting for him [Gillespie] is like voting for Warner. He’s the establishment.”

(…)

In his speech before Saturday’s vote, Gillespie tapped into Republican anger with Obama and linked Warner to the president and to Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.), who would lose his leadership role in the chamber if the GOP picks up enough seats in November.

“We see the damaging effects of Obama-Reid-Warner policies all around us,” he said. “We know that our policies based on free markets and free people and our constitutional principle of limited government would make things better for ourselves and our families and our fellow Americans.”

In addition to his opposition to the Affordable Care Act, Gillespie said he will “fight any effort to increase our taxes” and will stand with coal miners — a reference to new emissions standards rolled out by the Obama administration last week.

The 2013 election left a lot of bad blood inside the Virginia GOP. The manner in which Ken Cuccinelli and his supporters used their power inside the party to force a convention rather than a primary, thus making it next to impossible for the Lt. Governor Bill Bolling to mount a campaign in the face of a committed grass roots base that could take over a convention but would likely have been swamped in a primary, was bitter enough that Bolling refused to endorse anyone in the November election and several long time Republicans openly backed Terry McAuliffe in the election. When the convention ended up choosing E.W. Jackson Jr, a “Bishop” with no political experience and a long history of making bizarre statements in public, the damage became even worse. Given that, the powers-that-be in the Republican Party of Virginia were determined to make sure that the same thing didn’t happen this year, and they were largely successful.

Given the rather weak bench of contenders that the RPV had going into 2014, Gillespie is a good choice. He’s got ties to the parties conservative wing but isn’t the kind of right-wing radical that someone like Ken Cuccinelli came across as last year. On the whole, he’s a decent candidate. However, it’s going to be next to impossible for the GOP to make this a competitive race. Mark Warner remains one of the most popular politicians in the Commonwealth and while it’s been some time since there has been any polling of the race, his lead over Gillespie seems insurmountable . The only way Virginia becomes competitive is if this turns into a massive Republican wave election or if Mark Warner makes a serious political mistake. Right now, I don’t see either one of those things happening.

Related Posts:

About Doug Mataconis
Doug holds a B.A. in Political Science from Rutgers University and J.D. from George Mason University School of Law. He joined the staff of OTB in May, 2010 and also writes at Below The Beltway. Follow Doug on Twitter | Facebook

Comments

  1. OzarkHillbilly says:

    The only way Virginia becomes competitive is if this turns into a massive Republican wave election or if Mark Warner makes a serious political mistake.

    Does he have a wife suffering from severe dementia in a nursing home? Maybe they could sneak in, take pictures of her and post them all over the internet. Certainly didn’t hurt McDaniel.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

  2. Wow, a GOP hack, who was for the individual mandate before he was against it, versus one of the most overrated politicians in Virginia, who gets to tote his alleged knowledge of technology and business without anyone calling him for the clusterfraks known as VITA and STARS.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. CSK says:

    When Gillespie loses, as he probably will, the loons will come out with their rote response: that he was just too, too liberal. If only he’d come out in favor of trans-vaginal probes for pregnant women, say, he’d have won in a landslide.

    Yeah, yeah, I know. But that’s the way they think, if you can call it thinking.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

  4. @Timothy Watson:

    Who else do they have?

    McDonnell might have been a credible candidate for Senate if it weren’t for, well, you know.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. @Doug Mataconis: Bill Bolling? Heck, some backbencher in the General Assembly?

    There’s hours of video out there that will make Gillespie look like a complete moron (I wasn’t aware of how full of crap Gillespie was until Stewart had some video of him a couple years back complaining about Obama promoting the fact that he ordered the assault on bin Laden’s compound).

    My comment was also about how overrated Mark Warner is and how vulnerable he could if someone would actually push back on the crap that he gets to say without anyone questioning it. Warner touts his business and technological knowledge (sitting on cell phone frequency licenses after writing the legislation involving their regulation and licensing while on the Congressional committee staff counts as both business and technological knowledge nowadays apparently), but no one calls him on his bullshit.

    The only time I’ve seen anyone call him out in public was a couple weeks on WTOP while the hosts were talking about Veterans Affairs (VA) scandal. Warner keep throwing out crap about how the VA needed focus on “data management” and the male host went off on him, angrily saying something to the effect of, “Senator, you can throw around all the buzzwords you want, but that has nothing to do with Veterans Affairs staff not doing their jobs.”

    It’s the first and only time that I’ve seen Warner stammer all over himself without anything to say.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0