War Dead Myths
Michelle Malkin highlights a chart in the New York Times compiled by Lawrence Kolb and Nigel Holmes that puts lie to the myth that blacks have suffered a disproportionate share of the combat deaths in Iraq. Indeed, whites and hispanics both suffered higher casualty rates than blacks. This was also true, she notes, in all of our previous wars. The reason is the same in both cases: black soldiers are more likely to serve in combat support and service support roles. Through WWII, this was because blacks were denied the honor of serving in the combat arms; since, it’s been a matter of choice.
What’s also interesting is that Regular Army soldiers and Marines have suffered a much higher casualty rate, as a percentage of the force, than have Guard and Reserve personnel:
The reasons are largely the same: Most of the reservists called up are in the support branches.
Related Posts
- None Found
About James Joyner
Hearing about whites who volunteer for active service, in greater numbers than their minority counterparts, and who more frequently pay the ultimate price, just doesn’t make for a good news story.
They forgot about the number of troops (children!) aged 18-21 who have died. The actual numbers are far less than the claims made in irresponsible reports. But again, great inflammatory press.
When will there be some sort of accountability for deliberately misleading the public with politically skewed “news” stories?
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
It’s worth pointing out that the Kolb is a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, which is hardly a conservative bastion.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
True ’nuff. Korb was also a staunch opponent of the Iraq War.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
Which grunts bear the brunt?
The Army has borne the brunt of the casualties because two-thirds of all KIAs have been Army. But the Marines have suffered a higher percentage of KIAs than the Army.
Yet we can’t stop there because the differing roles and missions of the two servi…
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0