An Historic Moment For The Papal Installation Mass

For the first time since at least 1054, and probably earlier than that, the Patriarch of Constantinople will be attending Pope Francis’s Installation Mass tomorrow:

ANKARA, Turkey (AP) – Bartholomew I, the spiritual leader of the world’s Orthodox Christians, left Monday for the Vatican to attend Pope Francis’ installation Mass – the first time a patriarch from the Istanbul-based church is attending a papal investiture since the two branches of Christianity split nearly 1,000 years ago.

Bartholomew said he was attending the installation Mass to underscore the importance he attaches to “friendly ties” between the churches and reflects expectations that the new pontiff will advance rapprochement efforts that began decades ago.

“It is a gesture to underline relations which have been developing over the recent years and to express my wish that our friendly ties flourish even more during this new era,” Bartholomew told private NTV television in an interview in Istanbul before his departure. “I am very hopeful in this matter.”


In a sign of common bonds between East and West, the Vatican said the Gospel during the installation Mass would be chanted in Greek instead of Latin, the language that will be used for many of the other elements of the ceremony.

The Eastern and Western churches were united until the Great Schism of 1054, a divide precipitated largely by disagreements over the primacy of the pope.

Francis’ predecessor, the now-retired Pope Benedict XVI, had made uniting all Christians and healing the split a priority of his pontificate. A joint committee has been working to mend the rift between the two churches.

Rev. Dositheos Anagnostopoulos, the spokesman for the Istanbul-based Patriarchate, said Bartholomew would become the first Orthodox spiritual leader to attend an investiture since the Schism. The decision to attend the Mass at St Peter’s Square on Tuesday was “the fruit” of the growing dialogue between the Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches, he said.

Bartholomew went further to say he would be the first Orthodox spiritual leader to attend an investiture since “at least” before the Schism.

“Even before the churches were divided in 1054, a patriarch from Istanbul did not attend the inauguration,” he explained.

The Patriarch said: “From the first day, (Pope Francis) has won over hearts with his modest demeanor… I felt the wish to go and I am going willingly.”

While the issues between the Catholic and Orthodox Churches remain quite complicated, I don’t think one should dismiss the significance of  this event. Bartholomew has been Patriarch since 1991 and in that time he has been seemingly quite receptive to the ecumenical discussions initiated by Pope John Paul II and continued by his successor Pope Benedict XVI. The two great churches of early Christendom split in much the same way that the two halves of the Roman Empire split, mostly over doctrinal issues that seem trivial at this point. In reality, the commonalities between the Catholic and Orthodox faiths are far more numerous than the differences.

FILED UNDER: Religion, , , , , , ,
Doug Mataconis
About Doug Mataconis
Doug Mataconis held a B.A. in Political Science from Rutgers University and J.D. from George Mason University School of Law. He joined the staff of OTB in May 2010 and contributed a staggering 16,483 posts before his retirement in January 2020. He passed far too young in July 2021.


  1. michael reynolds says:

    958 years. That is a long pout.

  2. Jim Hodge says:

    “Jim Hodge – Allied Home Mortgage have been attacked by lawyers and the liberal press. A self made man of humble means is working hard to restore the jobs lost by these baseless attacks”

  3. Galanti says:

    Whatever issues one may have with the Catholic Church (and there are grounds for many), it is always fascinating to reflect on how it and the Orthodox Church represent a more or less unbroken link back to the Roman Empire.

  4. Dave Schuler says:

    One of the factors that frequently goes unrecognized relevant to the Roman Catholic Church’s views on the ordination of women is the effect it would have on Eastern Orthodox Churches. The Western Church has been making overtures for decades to the Orthodox Churches and, for a while, to the Church of England as well.

    When the Church of England began ordaining women Catholicism found itself in the position of having to choose between the CoE and the Orthodox Churches who were at that time very much opposed to the idea. They chose the Orthodox Churches.

    Some of the Orthodox Churches, e.g. the Coptic Church, have a continuing tradition of women deacons. IMO that may form a small wedge opening the way for a broader women’s diaconate in other Orthodox Churches with the eventual possibility of women priests. Spillover effects with Roman Catholicism would be possible although not certain. Many Orthodox Churches have a continuing tradition of a married clergy but that hasn’t spilled over into the Western Church other than in a very few very unusual circumstances.