April Fool’s Forum

FILED UNDER: Open Forum
Steven L. Taylor
About Steven L. Taylor
Steven L. Taylor is a Professor of Political Science and a College of Arts and Sciences Dean. His main areas of expertise include parties, elections, and the institutional design of democracies. His most recent book is the co-authored A Different Democracy: American Government in a 31-Country Perspective. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of Texas and his BA from the University of California, Irvine. He has been blogging since 2003 (originally at the now defunct Poliblog). Follow Steven on Twitter

Comments

  1. OzarkHillbilly says:

    Wow, I feel really special now. A whole forum in my honor. I did NOT have that on my Bingo card.

    8
  2. OzarkHillbilly says:

    A judge on Friday refused to dismiss Dominion Voting Systems’ $1.6bn defamation lawsuit against Fox News, clearing the way for the case to proceed to trial beginning in mid-April.

    The judge denied Fox’s motion for summary judgment, instead granting Dominion’s motion in part.

    “The evidence developed in this civil proceeding demonstrates that is CRYSTAL clear that none of the Statements relating to Dominion about the 2020 election are true,” the judge wrote. “Therefore, the Court will grant summary judgment in favor of Dominion on the element of falsity.”

    That is the first step.

    And in yet another courtroom:

    A federal judge has temporarily blocked a new Tennessee law that placed strict limits on drag shows just hours before it was set to go into effect, siding with a group that filed a lawsuit claiming the statute violates the first amendment.

    The decision on Friday comes after Memphis-based LGBTQ+ theatre company Friends of George’s filed the lawsuit on Monday against the Shelby county district attorney, Steve Mulroy, and the state.

    US district judge Thomas Parker issued the temporary injunction against the first such law in the US after hearing arguments on both sides on Thursday. Parker wrote that the state has failed to make a compelling argument as to why Tennessee needed the new law, adding that the court also agrees the statute is vague and overly broad.

    The word “drag” doesn’t appear in the new law, which instead changed the definition of adult cabaret in Tennessee to mean “adult-oriented performances that are harmful to minors”. Furthermore, “male or female impersonators” are now classified as a form of adult cabaret, akin to strippers and topless, go-go and exotic dancers. The law banned adult cabaret performances from public property or anywhere minors might be present.

    “The law prohibits a drag performer wearing a crop top and miniskirt from dancing where minors might see it, but does not prohibit a Tennessee Titans cheerleader wearing an identical outfit from performing the exact same dance in front of children,” the initial complaint contends.

    Freedom of speech always seemed the obvious attack against this law to me, but IANAL.

    9
  3. OzarkHillbilly says:

    A Santa Fe judge on Friday accepted a plea deal, bringing the first conviction for the 2021 shooting death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins during filming of the western movie Rust in New Mexico. Dave Halls, first assistant director on Rust, pleaded no contest as part of an agreement with prosecutors to the misdemeanor charge of negligent use of a deadly weapon for his role in Hutchins’ death.

    Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer of Santa Fe district court presided over a virtual hearing in Halls’ case on Friday. She sentenced Halls, who was responsible for on-set safety, to a six-month suspended sentence with unsupervised probation, a $500 fine, 24 hours of community service and a firearms safety class.

    If he was guilty the negligent use of a deadly weapon in this case, what are Republicans (and a few DEMs, thinking of Manchinema) guilty of in the cases of daily slaughter this country is subjected to?

    4
  4. OzarkHillbilly says:

    Drought or no drought? California left pondering after record winter deluge

    Just a few months ago, millions in California were living under mandatory water conservation rules. The driest three years on record had transformed the state, depleted reservoirs and desiccated landscapes. Then came a deluge. A dozen atmospheric river storms and several “bomb cyclones” have broken levees and buried mountain communities in snow, but they have also delivered a boon. Reservoirs are refilling. Brown hills are blooming once again.

    So, is the drought finally over?

    The consensus among water experts and climate scientists is – sort of.

    The record snowpack and rains have erased the most severe signs of drought in many parts of the state. The US Drought Monitor has reported that only 9% of California is experiencing “severe” or “exceptional” drought conditions this month, down from 55% last fall. But the changes are largely surface-level – literally. Groundwater reserves remain critically low. And the state’s farms and cities are still using far more water than is available.

    3
  5. CSK says:

    @OzarkHillbilly:
    Are you an April Fool?

  6. OzarkHillbilly says:

    @CSK: I’m a fool (just ask my wife) and it’s April so I must be! I can say that I am happy to no longer be a March Fool.

    2
  7. Michael Reynolds says:

    @OzarkHillbilly:
    That report is out of date. Actually, I’m happy to report, zero percent is currently in either exceptional or extreme, severe drought is at 2%, moderate is 28% and abnormally dry is down to 45%. Also, all the reservoirs but one are at historical levels though only a few are at capacity.

    3
  8. EddieInCA says:

    @OzarkHillbilly:

    That’s a travesty. But well played to Mr. Hall. He covered his ass before anyone knew what was going on.

    HE, along with the Amourer and Key Grip, need to be the ONLY ones on trial.

    I can’t get across to most how egregious the charging of Baldwin is/was. Travesty.

    8
  9. OzarkHillbilly says:

    @EddieInCA: I can’t get across to most how egregious the charging of Baldwin is/was.

    I thought it was BS from the gitgo.

    1
  10. gVOR08 says:

    @EddieInCA: How do you not charge the guy who held, pointed, and fired the gun?

    2
  11. wr says:

    @Michael Reynolds: Right, and that’s all good news. I think the hard part for the people responsible for California’s water is not knowing if this year is going to be an anomaly, and one or two bad years later they’ll be in exactly the same terrible position, or whether the multi-year drought is finally over.

    And of course the really hard part will be convincing Californians not to immediately rush out and replant the lawns they tore up and quit all their drought-inspired habits.

    3
  12. wr says:

    @gVOR08: “How do you not charge the guy who held, pointed, and fired the gun?”

    Because he was told, and had every reason to believe, that what he was holding, pointing and firing was not a weapon but a prop, and a harmless one at that.

    One can make the argument that he should have been a better steward of the gun, even believing it was a harmless prop, and I’d probably agree with that.

    But if I pour someone a glass of wine not having any reason to suspect that someone put poison in it, I might feel bad about the death but I’d hardly be responsible for it.

    6
  13. Stormy Dragon says:

    @OzarkHillbilly:

    “April is the foolest month” 😉

    1
  14. wr says:

    @EddieInCA: “I can’t get across to most how egregious the charging of Baldwin is/was. Travesty.”

    But you don’t get elected to Congress on a platform of “I convicted a UPM and an associate producer.”

    1
  15. Stormy Dragon says:

    @wr:

    My understanding is they didn’t charge Alex Baldwin the actor for holding the gun, they charged Alex Baldwin the producer for failing to properly oversee the people who handed that gun to Alex Baldwin the actor.

    1
  16. Kathy says:

    @EddieInCA:

    I see multiple contributing factors in the Rust tragedy. But the main one, IMO, is who the hell brought live, lethal ammunition to the set to begin with.

    6
  17. Mu Yixiao says:

    If anyone is interested in very good–but rather odd–music, I highly recommend Nini Music on YouTube. She’s a Taiwanese musician who uses traditional instruments to play modern music (e.g., Folk Metal)–including both original music and covers.

    She does a live stream every Saturday morning where she takes requests if you tip*. Wonderful young woman who obviously loves playing, and interacting with fans. And… Taiwanese folk metal!

    I usually listen every weekend (at least for a while) and toss a tenner or so her way. Cheap live music. (And… I won’t lie: She’s easy on the eyes.)

    =====
    * She has a link to tip directly, so she gets 100% of the money rather than giving YouTube a 30% cut. And…. her suggested tip amounts are fun: $4.20, $6.90, $13.37. 😀

    2
  18. wr says:

    @Stormy Dragon: “My understanding is they didn’t charge Alex Baldwin the actor for holding the gun, they charged Alex Baldwin the producer for failing to properly oversee the people who handed that gun to Alex Baldwin the actor.”

    To be generous to these hicks, they might not have understood what the title “producer” actually meant in a situation like this. But once it had been explained to them — that it’s basically an honorific used to get Baldwin to work for less than his full quote — the decision to prosecute was nothing more than the Real Ammurrican prosecutor showing them fancy Hollywood folks what’s right, and hopefully riding that to a nomination.

    1
  19. Kathy says:
  20. DAllenABQ says:

    @wr: The Santa Fe prosecutors are not hicks. It is more accurate to call them left liberal lesbians.

    2
  21. gVOR08 says:

    @wr:

    Because he (Baldwin) was told, and had every reason to believe, that what he was holding, pointing and firing was not a weapon but a prop, and a harmless one at that.

    One, that obviates all the rules on firearms handling? Two, was he? I’ve not been following this so I may have this wrong, but I recall reading this wasn’t a scheduled rehearsal, that Baldwin decided to go practice his draw for the upcoming scene on his own. Was he handed the gun and told it was safe following whatever their normal procedure was or did he pick it up himself?

    I’m not rushing to assume the prosecutor doesn’t know what he’s doing.

  22. dazedandconfused says:

    @DAllenABQ:
    Prosecutors are a sort of politicians-in-training. Ass Covering is a significant part of the syllabus. Charging Baldwin settles the yahoos down. Baldwin mocked their Dear Leader on SNL, it’s an unforgivable offense.

    1
  23. EddieInCA says:

    @gVOR08:

    @EddieInCA: How do you not charge the guy who held, pointed, and fired the gun?

    Because this isn’t real life. It’s a movie set. And he wasn’t holding a “gun”. He was holding a movie prop he was told was safe.

    Let me put it into two other scenarios:

    Let’s assume a driver was put behind the wheel of a car and told to drive it to a certain point. Someone has cut the brake lines of the car, so when the actor goes to stop, it careens into people, killing one. Would the actor be charged? No.

    Let’s assume an actor has been given a knife he’s been told, multiple times, is a prop blade with a retractable blade to use in a scene. If he were to then use it as intended and literally stab someone, killing them, would he be charged? No?

    I knew John Erik Hexum very well, as he was dating a good friend of mine at the time of his death, and met Brandon Lee a few months before his death. John’s death was his own fault sadly, with the use of a blank. But Brandon Lee’s death was very similar to Halyna’s death in that it was pure negligence that caused the death.

    I’ve been doing this a long, long time, and the facts of the case aren’t hard. Baldwin is the least responsible. By far.

    There was certainly negligence, but not on the part of Alec Baldwin.

    3
  24. Kathy says:

    I want to say that airlines charging seat selection fees to premium passengers, is the overreach straw that might break the camel’s back. Alas, British Airways has been doing this for a while.

    Still, I wouldn’t be surprised if a few years from now, business class passengers will be offered buy on board food. It would start with drinks. Cheaper house wine and beer would be complimentary, but champagne and spirits would cost extra. Then maybe they’ll get cute with the entres, or maybe charge a fee to guarantee your choice of meal.

  25. EddieInCA says:

    @Stormy Dragon:
    @wr:

    My understanding is they didn’t charge Alex Baldwin the actor for holding the gun, they charged Alex Baldwin the producer for failing to properly oversee the people who handed that gun to Alex Baldwin the actor.

    What wr said. While Baldwin has a “Producer” credit, I guarantee you had had no say on hiring other than the Director, Production Designer, Director of Photography, Editor and Costume Designer.. Every single other person on the crew would have been hired by the Line Producer or UPM. Baldwin had zero oversight on these people. Again, this was a case where people with zero knowledge of how sets work decided to go after the “big fish” even though that fish wasn’t part of the chain of control of the prop gun.

    2
  26. OzarkHillbilly says:

    Paul Rosenzweig (@Ro*********@th**********.wtf)
    @RosenzweigP

    So, unless I am mistaken, given how Florida limits the restoration of felon voting rights, there is a real chance that Trump may be prohibited from voting for himself …

    2
  27. EddieInCA says:

    @gVOR08:

    One, that obviates all the rules on firearms handling?

    He was doing what the director asked him to do. Literally. So, yes.

    Two, was he? I’ve not been following this so I may have this wrong, but I recall reading this wasn’t a scheduled rehearsal, that Baldwin decided to go practice his draw for the upcoming scene on his own.

    Bullshit. This was the full rehearsal immediately before they were going to shoot the setup. He was following the director’s instructions. I know several people on the movie, and it was a normal rehearsal, and he was doing what the director asked, and suddenly, “Boom”.

    Was he handed the gun and told it was safe following whatever their normal procedure was or did he pick it up himself?

    It was handed to him before the rehearsal directly by David Hall, the 1st AD, who loudly called “Cold Gun!” before handing it to Baldwin. That has been confirmed in several news reports. David Hall did not check the gun, as was HIS JOB before handing it to Baldwin.

    I’m not rushing to assume the prosecutor doesn’t know what he’s doing.

    I am. I can say for a fact that the prosecutor doesn’t know what they’re doing because he/she made a plea deal with David Hall, the 1st AD, whose job it is to be the ultimate safety arbiter on set.

    4
  28. DAllenABQ says:

    @dazedandconfused: The prosecutors are not Trump fanboys in the slightest. Santa Fe is about as blue as it gets. I personally know the prosecutor who handled the case in which the crew member pled guilty to negligent handling of a firearm (Kari Morrissey); I can assure she is not a Trumper.

    3
  29. dazedandconfused says:

    @DAllenABQ:

    Doesn’t matter if they are Trumpers or not. The key is they were, bet the farm, taking heat from the Trumpers. This settles them down.

  30. senyordave says:

    I was reading about a great April Fool’s joke from the English newspaper The Guardian back in 1977:
    On April 1st 1977, The Guardian ran a special report on the islands of San Serriffe, a semicolon-shaped paradise near the Seychelle Islands. The existence of this oasis was, of course, a myth- believable at first glance but suspicious on closer inspection.

    Under the layer of satire, The Guardian tested its journalistic boundaries and its readership’s ability to separate fact from fiction.¹ San Serriffe is a play on San Serif, which is the name for a particular typeface; examples of it include Arial, Comic Sans and Gill Sands (the latter being a cove featured on the western coast of the Lower Caisse island of Sans Serriffe). Many readers praised the paper and, in some cases, played along with the joke; others were fooled and angered by it.² What was the thinking behind the creation of San Serriffe? What can a report of a faraway land tell us about the Western view of the ‘other’? How do we view this joke now when the threat of fake news is growing and constant?

    The joke was helped by actual companies advertising in the supplement, including Guinness, Texaco and Kodak.
    The article I saw had a few of the original pages, and there was a map where almost every town was a variation of a font.