The current approach of the GOP to health care is not dissimilar to its approach to fiscal policy: not a lot of substance.
Both Bill Kristol and Brit Hume had interesting observations about Palin’s “blood libel” speech today on FNS.
A poll that came out late last week purports show that Palin’s speech helped her public image. However, if we look at the numbers, that claim is a weak one.
Palin’s “blood libel” speech continued to keep here in the conversation about Tucson, and not in a positive way.
Palin is missing an opportunity in the way she is dealing with the whole target graphic situation.
We really need a better understanding of mental health disorders in this county, and events like those over the weekend underscore this fact.
Thankfully, attacks on members of Congress are a rarity.
Graphic by Sarah Palin’s PAC had Gabriel Giffords’ district in the crosshairs
Note: while this post is brief, the news is of such significance that I felt it should be a headline story rather than relegated to a “quick pick”.
The shooting of Representative Giffords is tragic and undeniably political. Still, we need to be cautious about accusations and speculation.
When determining the effects on the deficit of a certain legislative action, both revenues and spending have to be accounted for. Indeed, you can’t determine whether there is a deficit, surplus or balanced budget without both variables.
Some members of Congress sleep in their offices in lieu of renting residences in DC. Fiscally responsible or kinda odd?