Another entry in the ongoing follies of US border and immigration policy.
Yet again, a state seeks to buck the primary calendar (and yet again it provides a chance to wonder why we have the nomination system we have).
The grass is always greener on the candidate not running (or something like that).
These debates matter (if by “matter” we mean “affect the views that voters have of the candidates”).
Rick Santorum: naked partisan. (Although, really, this is more a post about the EC than it is about Santorum).
A book could be written on this subject, but let me suggest the following as a good place to start
Of the institutions designed by the Framers, the electoral college is the one that deserves the least amount of defense if one’s defense is predicated on assumptions of the genius of said framers.
The last two GOP debates have featured cheers from the crowd and responses from candidates that ought to be considered problematic.
Oz provides an excuse for some comparative politics.
Accusing someone of “politicizing” a discussion of 9/11 is like accusing someone of “athleticizing” a discussion of football.
Many in the GOP do not like the idea of extending payroll tax cuts.
Asserting the Social Security needs reform is one thing. Asserting its failure is another.
For a peace envoy, Blair has some nonpeaceful ideas.
Many seem to forget that it was the states that had to ratify the 17th Amendment.