Blame Canada

The latest revelations from the Wikileaks State Department document dump include the fact that our neighbors to the north aren’t as happy with us as we’d like to believe:

In early 2008, American diplomats stationed in Ottawa turned on their television sets and were aghast: there was an “onslaught” of Canadian shows depicting “nefarious American officials carrying out equally nefarious deeds in Canada,” from planning to bomb Quebec to stealing Canadian water supplies.

In a confidential diplomatic cable sent back to the State Department, the American Embassy warned of increasing mistrust of the United States by its northern neighbor, with which it shares some $500 billion in annual trade, the world’s longest unsecured border and a joint military mission in Afghanistan.

“The degree of comfort with which Canadian broadcast entities, including those financed by Canadian tax dollars, twist current events to feed longstanding negative images of the U.S. — and the extent to which the Canadian public seems willing to indulge in the feast — is noteworthy as an indication of the kind of insidious negative popular stereotyping we are increasingly up against in Canada,” the cable said.

A trove of diplomatic cables, obtained by WikiLeaks and made available to a number of publications, disclose a perception by American diplomats that Canadians “always carry a chip on their shoulder” in part because of a feeling that their country “is condemned to always play ‘Robin’ to the U.S. ‘Batman.’ ”

But at the same time, some Canadian officials privately tried to make it clear to their American counterparts that they did not share their society’s persistent undercurrent of anti-Americanism.

In July 2008, Canada’s intelligence service director, James Judd, discussed a video showing a crying Omar Khadr, then a teenager and a Canadian detainee at the prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. Mr. Judd “observed that the images would no doubt trigger ‘knee-jerk anti-Americanism’ and ‘paroxysms of moral outrage, a Canadian specialty.’ ”

A cable that briefed President George W. Bush before a visit to Ottawa in late 2004 shed further light on the asymmetrical relationship with Canada — a country, the embassy wrote, that was engaged in “soul-searching” about its “decline from ‘middle power’ status to that of an ‘active observer’ of global affairs, a trend which some Canadians believe should be reversed.”

How they’d go about doing that is somewhat unclear.

FILED UNDER: Quick Takes, US Politics, World Politics
Doug Mataconis
About Doug Mataconis
Doug holds a B.A. in Political Science from Rutgers University and J.D. from George Mason University School of Law. He joined the staff of OTB in May 2010. Before joining OTB, he wrote at Below The BeltwayThe Liberty Papers, and United Liberty Follow Doug on Twitter | Facebook

Comments

  1. Drew says:

    Yeah, but they won the gold medal in hockey. 

  2. schooner says:

    I have no doubt they believed that. David Wilkins was the Ambassador and about as loyal a Bushie as you can get. If the media isn’t parroting Fox they are immediately branded as biased in their world.

  3. DC Loser says:

    I’m sure the Canadians are all anguised over their diminished role in the world, what with their robust economy not affected by the mortgage meltdown and good health care. 

  4. John Hannaford says:

    That these somewhat-less-than-the-best-and-brightest continue to be sent to posts here in the GNW could be viewed as a compliment to our relationship.

  5. DonM says:

    We have to stop those Canadians from sending their actors (Leonard Nimoy, William Shatner, Michael J. Fox, ext) to the US. It is leading to greater unemployment of US actors.
    And make them pronounce their words correctly! A-boot time.