The denial of transfer to Federal Court could signal problems for Trump’s Presidential Immunity Claims
He appointed a third of the Justices but has the worst record before them in modern history.
A few predictions that are going to disappoint just about everyone.
Might not be bribery, but it’s still exerting influence.
Yet again, the Court has told the state that it has to draw lines that accommodate its Black citizens.
Why “the First Amendment protects Trump” defense doesn’t make sense
Legislature poised to approve new districts that appear to violate a federal court order.
The justices declined to review a bizarre 4th Circuit decision.
The Supreme Court sided with an anti-gay website designer.
Dueling headlines give radically different impressions of the same case.
The New York Times looks into ties between a DC area law school and the Supreme Court.
The Chief Justice’s wife is making a lot of money.
Is a threat in the eye of the receiver or the issuer?
The questionable ethics of living a lavish lifestyle based on high office.
A sensible compromise on a controversial issue.
The court declined to review a preacher’s lawsuit against my alma mater.
Culling for the primary feeder job in American legal system begins in high school.
A pending Supreme Court ruling could be more impactful than many realize.
The Supreme Court may revisit a controversial criminal justice ruling.
Opponents lose at the district and SCOTUS level in opening salvos.
The court, rightly, punted the issue to Congress and local leaders.
The term that kicks off today could undermine our entire system of government.
A new book raises fundamental questions about how far journalistic objectivity should extend.
The Department of Justice takes an utterly unsurprising, but important step in the Mar-a-lago document case
Roberts may not like it, but SCOTUS is political and does have a legitimacy problem.
I warned you all, my predictions are notoriously wrong.
Why would the Trump team release a document that casts them in such a bad light?
Some 4500 tip line reports were simply turned over to the White House and not investigated further.
A theory floated in Bush v Gore could radically change American elections.