Catholic Church Facing Financial Crisis
Despite its enormous riches, the Roman Catholic church is in financial crisis, according to an AP report.
New pope to face enormous financial issues
The next pope will not only have to care for the souls of his 1.1 billion-member flock worldwide, but also the church’s accounts, hit by the falling dollar, sex abuse settlements and a growing diplomatic mission. Like the chief executive of a worldwide corporation, John Paul II demanded financial accountability and promised greater transparency after years of secrecy and even scandal. But in the last years of his papacy the Holy See was back in the red. In presenting the latest accounting, the chief of the Holy See’s economic affairs office cited Europe’s sluggish economic recovery, poor investment climate and the rising strength of the euro against the dollar.
“Our financial statement could not help but reflect all of this,” said Cardinal Sergio Sebastiani.
The College of Cardinals running the church until a new pope is elected said in their daily report Tuesday that Sebastiani briefed them on the 2004 statement and several details of the 2005 budget, but gave no details. “The dollar has really hurt them,” said the Rev. Thomas Reese, a Vatican expert. “We’re not only talking about money coming from the United States. All the rich guys in the Third World also give in dollars.”
Vatican officials bristle at what John Paul once called “the myth” that the Holy See is immensely wealthy. In a rare disclosure last July, a Vatican accountant said the net patrimony, or the Vatican’s real estate holdings, are assessed at a relatively modest $908 million and that such properties as St. Peter’s Basilica and the Sistine Chapel are priceless, listed at a symbolic 1 euro.
The Vatican went through 23 money-losing years until 1993, but the situation improved dramatically after a revised code of church law made clear that dioceses around the world should assist the Vatican. Still, its most recent financial statement, issued in July for fiscal year 2003, reported a deficit for the third consecutive year. It listed 2003 revenues at about 203.6 million euros and expenditures of 213.2 million euros for a deficit of 9.6 million euros, or $11.8 million at the exchange rate at that time.
Vatican financial experts blame heavy personnel costs – 2,674 people work in Holy See offices, more than half of them lay people. But the Vatican has also greatly expanded its diplomatic activity during John Paul’s activist papacy and the Vatican now maintains relations with 174 states around the world – a costly enterprise.
The sex abuse crisis has also taken a heavy financial toll on the Church in the United States and Ireland. The total payout to victims of clergy sex abuse in the United States has now climbed to $840 million since 1950, with three dioceses – Spokane, Wash.; Portland, Ore.; and Tucson, Ariz. – seeking bankruptcy protection.
Given the lack of outside auditors and the absurdity of not counting the enormously valuable material possessions in the Vatican’s collection, I’m more than dubious of claims of poverty. Further, it’s difficult to be overly sympathetic to whatever financial discomfort having to pay for its decades-long coverup of child rape among its priesthood is causing the church.
The currency fluctuation issue is more interesting, however. The fact that even the Vatican is part of the wave of globalization is rather fascinating.
There is no doubt that many Americans are not giving anywhere near the amounts previously given because they are disgusted with the Churches lack of will to defrock or punish those who are committing sex crimes against the kids.
I have heard it said many times that the church is a haven for those who commit sex crimes.
I almost forgot. Many Americans are not pleased with Cardinal Law and his Vatican position. He belongs in jail
> the absurdity of not counting the enormously
> valuable material possessions in the Vatican’s
This would imply that you would be willing to sell or mortgage them to raise money.
Perhaps you are willing to do the same with the original copy of the Constitution or Declaration of Independence to reduce the deficit? After all, they are not counted as assets on the books of the U.S.
It’s not absurd to leave out the paintings and other material possessions – they are not held for profit, nor will they be sold. An alternative way to account for them would be to offset the tourist income that results. I think you’d find out that they don’t bring in a huge profit.
Frankly, not giving to the Church because of the scandals is a cop out. Since when does the Catholic Church refuse to help its laity because they’re not perfect?