Congress Likely to Authorize Electronic Eavesdropping
The release of the latest Osama bin Laden’s tape last week declaring that preparations for another attack against the United States are under way has apparently motivated Congressmen of both parties to advocate loosening the laws on electronic eavesdropping.
U.S. surveillance laws should be reviewed and possibly rewritten to allow the type of eavesdropping that U.S. President George W. Bush has been criticized for authorizing, lawmakers from both parties said on Sunday.
An audio tape by Osama bin Laden that emerged last week threatening new attacks on the United States has heightened security concerns. Neither party can afford to be seen as failing to protect the country, particularly as corruption scandals and public questioning of the Iraq war loom over November’s congressional elections. Lawmakers on several Sunday talk shows said that if the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) does not give Bush the tools and legal framework he needs to monitor potential threats, the president should ask Congress to change the law rather than bypass it.
Massachusetts Democrat John Kerry, who endorsed former Vice President Al Gore’s call for an independent investigation of the Bush program, said on ABC’s “This Week” that some Republicans like Bush adviser Karl Rove are trying to equate Democratic opposition to warrantless spying as weakness. “What he’s (Rove) trying to pretend is somehow Democrats don’t want to eavesdrop appropriately to protect the country. That’s a lie,” Kerry said. “We’re prepared to eavesdrop wherever and whenever necessary in order to make America safer.” But Kerry said the spying has to be legal and constitutional and if Bush needs the law to be changed, “then come to us and tell us… There is a way to protect the Constitution and not go off on your own and violate it.”
Other prominent Democratic senators including Dick Durbin of Illinois, Charles Schumer of New York and Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut made similar comments about reexamining the breadth and modernity of FISA in television interviews a few days after Rove urged Republicans to campaign on national security and the war on terror.
Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain, who has also questioned the legality of the eavesdropping, also urged the administration to work with Congress on modernizing the 1978 FISA law to take into account technological changes in communications. “I know of no member of Congress, frankly, who, if the administration came and said here’s why we need this capability, that they wouldn’t get it. And so let’s have the hearings,” McCain said on Fox News Sunday.
While I agree with the basic Kerry-McCain stance–that the president should have gotten approval from Congress on this–they are both applying selective memory. The number of Democrats, especially, who were arguing against the program per se rather than simply on separation of powers grounds when it broke was sizable. Further, Tom Daschle has claimed that the president sought authorization after 9/11 and was rebuffed.
Adam Nagourney correctly frames the terms of the debate, which the White House seems to be winning at the moment.
[A]s the White House and Democrats are well aware, the issue can draw very different reactions depending on how it is presented. These next few days could prove critical, as both Mr. Bush and Congressional Democrats move aggressively to define what is at stake. Americans may be willing to support extraordinary measures – perhaps extralegal ones – if they are posed in the starkest terms of protecting the nation from another calamitous attack. They are less likely to be supportive, members of both parties say, if the question is presented as a president breaking the law to spy on the nation’s own citizens.
The next step in presenting this as a vital tool against the terrorists is a series of key speeches which kicks off today:
President Bush plans to defend the program in a counterterrorism speech today at Kansas State University, aides said. The speech will kick off a flurry of administration activity leading to Senate hearings scheduled for Feb. 6. “We are stepping up our efforts to educate the American people about this vital tool in the war on terrorism,” White House spokesman Scott McClellan said.
Just before Bush’s speech today in Manhattan, Kan., Gen. Michael Hayden plans to discuss the surveillance program at the National Press Club. Hayden, the principal deputy director of national intelligence, once headed the National Security Agency, which conducts the surveillance. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales is scheduled to address the issue in a speech Tuesday, McClellan said. On Wednesday, the president plans to visit the NSA headquarters at Fort Meade in Maryland.
If these speeches dotheir job, the president’s opponents are going to be very reluctant to make too much of the program. Even if he was not technically authorized to launch the program, Democrats do not want to be painted as weak on fighting terrorists.
Related stories below the fold.
Democrats Playing Fast and Loose with National Security?
Can NYT Be Prosecuted for Publishing Classified Info?
NSA Spying Scandal: What If?
RisenÃ¢€™s State of War Preview
Leaks, Whistleblowers, and Media Shield Laws
NSA Initiated Expanded Spying Effort
Farber on FISA: ItÃ¢€™s Not Wiretapping
Our Domestic Intelligence Crisis
Deputy AG Had Doubts About Spy Program
Justice Department Investigating NSA Leaks
Daschle: Congress Denied Bush War Powers in U.S.
What is a Wartime President?
NSA Accidentally Listened to Domestic Calls