COULTER V. CLINTON
Drudge® highlights the impending publication of Ann Coulter’s Treason, for which she received a “seven-figure advance” from Crown, another Coulter insta-book that will go head-to-head with HRC’s fictional biography.
I must say Coulter’s stock with me continues to plummet. She conveniently makes up facts while accusing all liberals of lying, treason, and other loosely substantiated accusations. She’s gone from being a snarkier, conservative Maureen Dowd to being a pretty, conservative Paul Begala.
Coulter easily wins the cover wars, though:
Although it’s closer than it should be. That’s some airbrushing job on Sen. Clinton.
I tried to read her last book, but I just didn’t find it amusing or that well written.
Nice rack, though.
‘She conveniently makes up facts…’
Can you give some examples? I find her to be credible but I don’t see/hear her enough to say definitively.
Equating her with Begala is an extreme accusation. Ouch
If you’ve caught her making stuff up, that’s unpardonable, since she’s supposed to be the “accuracy cop.” We’re supposed to forgive her that abrasiveness because she does her homework. If she’s phoning it in, there’s no point. (Give me Peggy Noonan any old day.)
Isn’t more the legs than the rack? I’d defer to the guys on this . . .
I don’t think you can pin it down to “legs” or a “rack.” It’s the whole package.
She’s making up stuff? Can you point to a link? TIA
Also, I think we use PhotoShop now, instead of airbrushes.
This woman is ugly from the inside out. What is her problem? God, what a vicious, evil, ugly woman. I love watching her facial expressions on TV when she starts spouting off about liberals. There is something wrong mentally with this nasty person, she is way over the edge with her hatred of liberals. If I was a conservative, I would be embarrassed to have her as a spokesperson.
—