Defeating The Threat Of “Homegrown” Terrorism

Today’s Sunday Times of London editorializes on the enemy within:

The great challenge for Britain is how to stop this and minimise the future risks. Nobody should underestimate the scale of the problem or the time needed. We already have a generation of disaffected Muslims who see any excuse, whether it is war in Iraq, Afghanistan or Lebanon, as a reason for killing their fellow citizens. The government has commissioned studies on combatting the problem, so far with little tangible impact. Tony Blair has been wooing Muslim leaders, too often the radicals rather than the moderates, although this policy seems to lie in shreds as they moan about wars in the Middle East inflaming Islamic youth. They are perfectly entitled to be angry about these conflicts, but that anger should be expressed through the democratic processes of demonstrations and elections.

That is not to say that the government is not right to try to win over Muslim opinion. If terror is to be defeated, you have first to drain the swamp. Muslims have to be persuaded that we are on the same side, that there is no witch-hunt against Islam and that the wars involving British troops are about stopping Islamists and the corruption of their religion. This means Muslims being alert to extremists in their ranks and being prepared to identify them to the police. It means Muslims becoming intolerant of radical mullahs and hounding them out of their mosques. Equally the authorities have a responsibility to crack down on extremists in universities and in prisons, to close internet sites and bookshops that spread hatred and violence, and to take all reasonable measures to protect their citizens.

At times this may seem unjust. Muslims who visit Pakistan will have to be more closely scrutinised and it may seem that they are being systematically targeted. But Muslims will have to understand that it is their co-religionists who are bent on bombing trains and planes and that requires extraordinary measures. A mature Muslim response will be to co-operate and help to eradicate extremists in their midst. It requires the vast majority of Muslims to believe that their future is tied to Britain, a country in which their religion can be respected and freely practised. If the radicals succeed, it will foster only hatred and intolerance.

This low-level war is going to take a huge effort of will and courage. It is going to mean applying what may seem illiberal measures in order to save lives. In return, the state must exercise massive restraint and not abuse that responsibility. But the real key is for Muslims to realise that their future lies here and to embrace British values and reject violent Islamist theology. The country may indeed be in its greatest danger since the second world war, as John Reid, the home secretary, said last week. But as Britain prevailed then, so it will again.

It’s definitely worth taking the time to read the full editorial. This is as clear and concise a piece as any that I have read on the threat of jihadism that is emerging from within Western nations. And the candor with which this editorial describes what is necessary to succeed is a refreshing departure from the equivocal MSM here in America.

FILED UNDER: Middle East, Policing, Religion, Terrorism, Uncategorized, , , , , , , , , , , ,
Greg Tinti
About Greg Tinti
Greg started the blog The Political Pit Bull in August 2005. He was OTB's Breaking News Editor from June through August 2006 before deciding to return to his own blog. His blogging career eventually ended altogether. He has a B.A. in Anthropology from The George Washington University,


  1. arkat says:

    Yes as a south asian (indian) I agree compeltely with this analysis. In contrast the Washington Post has an analysis that is little more than appeasement and provides to further mislead the already clueless american public.


    Young Muslim Rage Takes Root in Britain
    Unemployment, Foreign Policy Fuel Extremism

    By Kevin Sullivan and Joshua Partlow
    Washington Post Foreign Service
    Sunday, August 13, 2006; A01

    LONDON, Aug. 12 — Naweed Hussain sat in his little real estate office Friday, trying to focus on spreadsheets instead of the angry clatter outside.

    Furious young Muslim men crowded around the local mosque on his street, surrounded by television cameras. They complained that their friends, other young Muslim men from Walthamstow, in East London, had been unfairly accused of plotting to blow up airliners. Police guarded the home of one suspect in what authorities call a plot to kill people on an “unimaginable” scale, allegedly planned right here in Hussain’s working-class neighborhood.

    “Why is it not happening in some other country?” wondered Hussain, 53, a soft-spoken man in a tie and black-rimmed glasses who has lived here since he migrated from Pakistan 40 years ago. “Why is it happening here?”

    The answer is that Britain has become an incubator for violent Islamic extremism, fueled by disenchantment at home and growing rage about events abroad, including the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    Four bombers killed themselves and 52 others in attacks on the London public transit system on July 7, 2005 , followed by an almost identical but failed attack two weeks later. Last month Metropolitan Police Commissioner Ian Blair said that at least three “serious conspiracies” had been disrupted in the previous 12 months. Then this week, police said they thwarted a plot to blow up as many as 10 airliners flying from Britain to the United States that could have killed thousands.

    In one of Europe’s largest Muslim communities, young men face a lack of jobs, poor educational achievement and discrimination in a highly class-oriented culture. Prime Minister Tony Blair is the most outspoken ally of President Bush, and their policies in Iraq and Afghanistan are seen by many Muslims as aimed at Islam.

    Britain’s long tradition of tolerance has made it an oasis for immigrants and political outcasts from around the world, with its large influx of Pakistanis and other Muslims leading to the nickname Londonistan. Especially during the 1980s and 1990s, Britain became the refuge of choice for scores of Islamic radicals who had been expelled or exiled from their home countries for their inflammatory sermons and speeches.

    More than any other country in Europe, Britain is struggling to cope with a surge in recruits and supporters of radical Islamic networks, according to interviews with British Muslims, and European and British counterterrorism officials and analysts. Officials said the threat is growing much faster than British authorities had expected or planned for.

    “The U.K. is at the forefront of the wrath of extremists,” said Magnus Ranstorp, terrorism researcher for the Swedish National Defense College in Stockholm.

    The British security service, known as MI5, disclosed last month that it had about 1,200 Islamic militants under surveillance who were considered capable of carrying out violent attacks. Peter Clarke, the head of Scotland Yard’s anti-terrorism branch, said police were engaged in 70 separate terrorism investigations, the most ever. “This is unprecedented and the flow of new cases shows no sign of abating,” Clarke said. “If anything, it is accelerating.”

    Since the July attacks, Blair’s government has toughened anti-terrorism laws, making it a crime to “glorify” terrorism and easing procedures for deporting clerics and others who advocate violence. The government has increased the number of Muslim police officers on the beat and conducted extensive outreach in Britain’s Muslim community, which officially numbers 1.6 million people but is widely believed to be 2 million or more.

    The attacks last summer, and this week’s disclosure of a plot to bomb jumbo jets from the sky, have created a sense of unease not often seen in a nation that stoically endured some of World War II’s worst bombings and a 30-year campaign of violence by the Irish Republican Army. Being a target of a new kind of terror — one without specific demands, that seems to many here to be motivated by vengeance and hate — has created a new uncertainty.

    “There is more nervousness now between communities and about the future,” said Colin Sumers, 32, an information technology consultant from Bournemouth. “Where is this all heading? How do you answer these problems? What do these terrorists want?”

    Asghar Bukhari of the Muslim Public Affairs Committee, which advocates Muslim involvement in the democratic process and opposes violence, said, “It’s not hard to comprehend the mind of a Muslim.” He said young British Muslims look around the world and “everywhere they are getting bombed,” so they increasingly respond by saying, “Don’t just sit down and take it — let’s fight them.”

    Harming the United States clearly remains a top priority of al-Qaeda and other radical groups, and the plot uncovered this week allegedly involved planes heading to major U.S. cities. But officials said Britain is an increasingly enticing target for extremists eager to strike back at the West, particularly Bush and Blair.

    “This is the second-best thing,” Ranstorp said. “You can’t get to the United States? Punish Britain. Punish the little brother.”
    Seeds of Radical Islam

    Sitting in his office in Walthamstow, Hussain said he has watched with dismay as his neighborhood has grown more angry in recent years. “I never expected anything like this,” he said, working at a wooden desk by the window, under a framed map of England.

    Since he arrived in Walthamstow as a 14-year-old boy from Islamabad, Pakistan, Hussain has seen the neighborhood’s industrial past fade away and the South Asian immigrant population swell, part of the great migration of people from around the world — including many former British colonies — that has made London one of the world’s most diverse cities.

    Little is known about the background or motives of suspects in the latest case. The 19 suspects who have been publicly identified all have Muslim names; 14 are from London, including several from Walthamstow; four are from High Wycombe, a quiet suburb west of London; and one is from the city of Birmingham. They range in age from 17 to 35, all but three of them in their twenties. Friends interviewed in Walthamstow said the suspects were either born in England or were from families who have lived for many years in London. Police have released no further information about them.

    Hussain said many Pakistani immigrants moved out of tiny apartments cramped with relatives and now own multiple cars and houses and flourish financially. But over the years, he has also seen the seeds of radical Islam grow around him.

    Despite the prosperity of some Muslims, statistics released by the government earlier this year showed that unemployment rates were higher among Muslims than for any other religion. Among Muslims aged 16 to 24, almost 28 percent were unemployed, compared with about 12 percent of Britons overall in that age group. Many here argue that isolation and disenchantment among young Muslims provides a fertile environment for extremist groups recruiting new members.

    “Whoever teaches or preaches or brainwashes them, the police need to stop them,” Hussain said.

    Menzies Campbell, leader of the Liberal Democrats and a leading opponent of Blair’s government, said the reasons young Muslims turn to violence are more complicated than simply economic and social disadvantages.

    “I used to think it was about having a stake in society, about people having poor housing and poor education,” he said. “But the more you look at it, explaining it away as a lack of a stake in the success of the country might not be the easy answer some people think it is.”
    ‘Democracy by Force’

    “The root is foreign policy,” said Bukhari, who has emerged in the past year as a leading voice of the young Muslim community. “Only a half-wit wouldn’t understand that this is about” British and American policies in the Middle East.

    Ahmed Versi, editor of the Muslim News, said he receives at least two e-mails a day with pictures of dead bodies: Muslims who have been killed in conflicts around the world — most recently in Lebanon, where Israel is fighting Hezbollah — an effort widely seen here as backed by the United States and Britain. He said the photos are part of mass mailings to e-mail lists across the Muslim world, which inflame sentiments and aid recruiting by extremist groups.

    “Young children torn to pieces, killed by the Israelis,” Versi said. “Iraq is also a major cause. Young people see these pictures.”

    Ehsan Hannan, spokesman for the London Muslim Center, said British foreign policy, which she said advocates the “spread of democracy by force,” was creating enough anger to push some people from anger to violence.

    On Friday, several leading Muslim politicians and 38 Muslim groups, including the moderate Muslim Council of Britain, wrote to Blair calling for “urgent” changes to British foreign policy, arguing that the “debacle” of Iraq and other policies in the Middle East had put British civilians at risk at home and abroad.

    On Friday afternoon, dozens of Muslim men came to the Darul Uloom Qadria Jalani mosque near the house of another Walthamstow suspect. After prayer services, many of the men denounced the British government, the United States and Israel — which many see as allied against Islam.

    “It’s George Bush’s policy that got us here today,” said one worshiper, a law student, who declined to give his name. “It’s his wars that have breeded the mentality and hate that is here today. And what we’re angry about is that our Prime Minister Tony Blair doesn’t represent the beliefs of the people.”
    Feeling Under Siege

    On Sept. 11, 2001, Hussain was managing a retail electronics shop, surrounded by television sets that replayed the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon over and over. “It is still in my mind,” he said.

    Since that day, and especially since the bombings in London last year, many British Muslims have felt under siege, discriminated against and feared for having a beard or dressing in traditional Muslim clothing. When the news broke this week of the arrests in the alleged bomb plot, one of Hussain’s two daughters, Afsheen, 15, asked him: “Why do they call them Muslim terrorists? Are we like that?”

    Hussain said when he walks around the city, people look at him and draw conclusions about him because he is a Muslim. He said that angers him, but he has also felt suspicious of others. Last weekend, when his brother visited London, Hussain rode on the subway to Piccadilly and Trafalgar Square to go sightseeing. It was his first subway ride since the bombings last year. “I saw someone carrying a big bag and it did cross my mind, you know: There could be a bomb in there,” he said. “If it was a bearded man, it would have been worse.”

    Still, many young Muslims believe they have been unfairly targeted by police. Scotland Yard released statistics on Friday showing that 1,047 people had been arrested under the Terrorism Act between September 2001 and the end of June. Of those, only 158 were eventually charged with offenses covered by the law. Officials did not say how many of those arrested were Muslims. But Muslim officials have complained that the vast majority of those arrested were Muslims, and that the low number of people charged suggests that most of the arrests were unwarranted.

    Many Muslims have been especially skeptical of the police since last summer, when officers shot and killed an innocent Brazilian electrician they mistook for a terrorism suspect. Then in June, police conducted a massive raid in the Forest Gate neighborhood of East London and arrested two brothers they suspected of preparing a chemical attack on London. Police shot one of the brothers during the raid and later released the men with an apology, saying officers had acted on incorrect intelligence.

    In East London on Friday, many people said that the police track record made them skeptical that the 23 suspects still in custody were guilty. “They said this was intelligence-driven and we have seen intelligence of the British,” said Hamza Qureshi, 20, a student.
    ‘Muslim First and Foremost’

    “Britain became the center of gravity for militant causes in Europe in the latter half of the 1990s and this made a very solid base for radicalization,” said Petter Nesser, an analyst at the Norwegian Defense Research Establishment who studies radical Islamic networks in Europe.

    Welcoming immigration regulations combined with strict European Union human rights standards have often made it tough for Britain to expel the most radical of the newcomers. While Britain in recent months has eased deportation laws to try to get rid of several clerics who advocated violence, human rights laws have prevented deportations to countries such as Syria and Algeria, where deportees could be subject to torture or other inhumane treatment.

    Courts have repeatedly sided with nine Afghans who hijacked an Ariana Airlines plane in 2000, took its passengers and crew hostage and flew to Britain. They requested political asylum status, arguing they would be persecuted by the extremist Taliban government that was then in place. After serving relatively short jail terms, the men have won court decisions preventing their deportation to Afghanistan. Blair called such decisions an “abuse of common sense,” but judges have responded that they are simply enforcing the law.

    Blair and other British officials have also lamented the failure of many in the Muslim community to fully integrate into British society, preferring to live instead in neighborhoods where they rarely mix with others.

    “The identity of Muslims in the U.K. is Muslim first and foremost and British second,” Ranstorp said, echoing a recent Pew global survey of Muslim attitudes that found that 81 percent of British Muslims who responded agreed with that sentiment. Only Pakistan had a higher percentage of people who considered themselves Muslims first, the survey showed.

    Correspondent Craig Whitlock and staff writer Anushka Asthana in Washington and special correspondent Alexandra Topping in Isle of Wight, England, contributed to this report.
    © 2006 The Washington Post Company

  2. Anderson says:

    And the candor with which this editorial describes what is necessary to succeed is a refreshing departure from the equivocal MSM here in America.

    Hm. Could the difference be due to there being relevant and significant differences b/t the Muslim situation in the UK and that in the US?

  3. Anderson says:

    I should’ve remembered to quote ObWi’s Andrew on the same topic:

    We just foiled a plot that might have killed thousands of people thanks to … a British Muslim who was worried about something he’d seen in the wake of the 7/7 London bombings. All this talk about how the improved surveillance techniques, the NSA, etc. were responsible for stopping this attack overlook that, however much help those things may (or may not) have helped, we stopped the enemy because of a tip from the very community 39% of Americans would like to brand with a yellow Crescent. I’m sure that will really encourage American Muslims to speak out in the future.

  4. Michael says:

    Muslims have to be persuaded that we are on the same side, that there is no witch-hunt against Islam and that the wars involving British troops are about stopping Islamists and the corruption of their religion.

    Perhaps we can start by not using the name of their religion as a profanity of derogatory label. I’m sure most of us wouldn’t like to hear Muslims talking about Christists or Judeo-Fascists. Heck, even most of their anti-Israeli rhetoric uses the word “Zionist” to specify a select group of Jews, not their religion.