Does Religious Outreach Equal Evangelical Outreach?

Buddhist Monks at Prayer
Both Mark Hemingway and Ross Douthat have linked to these recent Pew polling numbers, which indicate that Obama has one point less white evangelical support than Kerry did at this point in the 2004 election. Douthat notes that this isn’t actually good news for McCain:

Or you could read them as good news for Obama, since McCain is currently running eight points behind where George W. Bush stood at this point in ’04. I’d choose the latter reading. In July of 2004, only 4 percent of white evangelicals said they were undecided about whom to vote for. Now 12 percent say that they are – and while it’s possible that nearly all of those undecideds will come home to the GOP once the chips are down, undecided voters do tend to break against the incumbent party, which seems to open a pretty sizable opening for Obama.

Mark Hemingway, on the other hand, notes this news with a bit of glee:

Despite all the hype over Obama’s religious outreach, a new Pew survey indicates Obama actually has slightly less support from evangelicals than John Kerry had at this point four years ago. Not that this translates into evangelical enthusiasm for McCain, but the survey is worth noting for no other reason than it challenges the prevailing media assumptions about how Obama’s overt religiosity is helping his campaign — which my better half details here.

Personally, I think that both Douthat, Pew Research, and Hemingway are all missing the boat on this one. The story here isn’t that Obama’s score is one point less than Kerry’s among Evangelicals. The story here is that right now, Obama is leading among religiously affiliated voters with a score of 45-43. In 2004 at this point, Bush led among religiously affiliated voters 50 – 44.

Clearly, it’s tougher to make comparisons among religious demographics at this point, because there are much larger numbers of undecided voters than there were in the comparable 2004 election. But the fact that Obama is winning among overall religious voters even as he’s losing among evangelicals points out what should be obvious: despite the media narratives of the past couple of decades, Evangelicals are not the end-all, be-all of religious communities in the United States. Which makes the idea that Obama’s “religious outreach” is unsuccessful because Evangelicals largely support McCain less than convincing, and somewhat insulting to the vast majority of religious Americans who aren’t Evangelical. Last time I checked, they vote, too.

Image credit: neilalderney123’s photostream

FILED UNDER: 2008 Election, Religion, , , , , , , ,
Alex Knapp
About Alex Knapp
Alex Knapp is Associate Editor at Forbes for science and games. He was a longtime blogger elsewhere before joining the OTB team in June 2005 and contributed some 700 posts through January 2013. Follow him on Twitter @TheAlexKnapp.

Comments

  1. Dave Schuler says:

    More important is Obama’s support among Catholics, the largest religious denomination in the country.

  2. Ken Sturmer says:

    I have to agree with the writer. Why are the Evangelicals always brought up. They are only a minority of the religions in this nation!

    Who gives a damn what they think, they do not speak for everyone. They speak only for an extremely vocal minority! The so called “Christian Taliban”, who would require everyone to believe as they do. They must learn and learn soon, that they have no special connection with God.

  3. Triumph says:

    Which makes the idea that Obama’s “religious outreach” is unsuccessful because Evangelicals largely support McCain less than convincing, and somewhat insulting to the vast majority of religious Americans who aren’t Evangelical.

    I’m sure Hussein will win the vote of his fellow Muslims–which is just another reason why we should have a quality-of-religion test for all voters.

  4. Floyd says:

    Ken;
    Your loquacious commentary would be enhanced with a touch of veracity, or lacking that, perhaps decorum?