Haiti vs. Iraq

Citizen Smash is confused:

LESS THAN ONE YEAR after the “unilateral” invasion of Iraq, the United States is conducting a joint military operation, along with our allies Canada and France, to restore order in Haiti. And it’s been sanctioned by the United Nations.

Whatever happened to the “irreperable damage to international order” that Operation Iraqi Freedom was supposed to bring?

FILED UNDER: World Politics, , , ,
James Joyner
About James Joyner
James Joyner is Professor and Department Head of Security Studies at Marine Corps University's Command and Staff College and a nonresident senior fellow at the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security at the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer and Desert Storm vet. Views expressed here are his own. Follow James on Twitter @DrJJoyner.

Comments

  1. Hal says:

    Wow. He’s really scraping the bottom of the barrel here with that one.

    Geesh.

  2. Jim says:

    What about the calls the Democrats to intervene in Haiti as an unilaterist action? I was waiting for the United Nations resolutions, monitor teams and the formal studies before we took this reckless step.

  3. McGehee says:

    I should find it deliciously ironic that the same Democrats who complained about “unilateralism” in Iraq have been slamming the administration for not acting unilaterally in Haiti.

    But I don’t. I find it pathetically predictable. I find it perfectly in character for them to embrace two contradictory positions before breakfast and then treat anyone who notices the contradiction as a dunderhead.

  4. Their positions are not inconsistent.

    They opposed removing Saddam, an anti-American dictator, from Iraq.

    They wanted us to help prop-up Aristide, an anti-American dictator, in Haiti.

  5. McGehee says:

    So what you’re saying is, they’re all for unilateralism when it suits them politically.

    <writes it down>