Tuesday, January 23, 2007
Libby defense attorney Ted Wells stated in his opening argument that his client feared “being a scapegoat” and “being set up” by “people in the White House” trying to “protect Karl Rove.”
Heh. From what I’ve been able to piece together, it’s looking more like Libby’s going to become a scapegoat for Cheney. I wonder if that will make prison food taste better…
I understand the breaking-news aspect of each element of the argument, but spreading it out over a dozen posts makes any reader discussion a bit difficult.
Maybe have a “comment thread” every so often? Am I the only one struck by this?
Make a one-time donation