Most Americans Want Trump Gone, But Not By Impeachment

A new poll shows that most Americans want President Trump out of office, but don't want to see the House impeach him.

A new poll from Monmouth University shows that a majority of Americans want to see President Trump out of office, but they don’t want to see Congress proceed with impeachment:

A majority of voters wants to see a new president in the White House, according to a new poll, but 59 percent say President Trump should not be impeached. 

Fifty-seven percent of respondents said it is time to have a new president, according to a Monmouth University poll released Thursday. However, only 35 percent said they think Trump should be impeached. 

Democrats overwhelmingly backed impeachment, at 72 percent. Only 39 percent of independents and 8 percent of Republicans agree, based on the poll.  

Overall support for impeachment has ranged between 35 and 42 percent since Monmouth started polling that question in July 2017.

Earlier this month, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler(D-N.Y.) said the House had started formal impeachment proceedings and is gathering evidence to decide later this year whether or not to vote on articles of impeachment. Some 130 House Democrats back impeachment proceedings, based on The Hill’s whip list

Of the 59 percent of Americans who said they do not support formal impeachment, 27 percent said it’s because they think Trump has done nothing wrong, according to Monmouth. Another 13 percent said the impeachment inquiry would be a partisan “witch hunt,” echoing the president’s own language on the matter. 

If the House were to pass articles of impeachment, just 20 percent of respondents said they think there is a chance the Senate would vote to oust Trump, according to the poll. It would require two-thirds of the Republican-controlled Senate to impeach the president. 

Some voters, 31 percent, said an impeachment process without a conviction could put Trump in a stronger position to be reelected. Just 23 percent said such an outcome would put him in a weaker position, and 36 percent said it would have no significant outcome. 

More details from the poll report itself:

President Donald Trump’s approval rating may remain underwater, but a majority of the public continues to oppose removal by impeachment even as the House Judiciary Committee has started proceedings.  The latest Monmouth University Poll finds that about one-fifth of those who disapprove of Trump’s job performance join nearly all of those who approve of the president to say that moving ahead with an impeachment inquiry is a bad idea. Only 1-in-5 Americans think that an impeachment trial would actually lead to Trump’s removal from office.  Opinion is mixed in terms of how this could impact the 2020 elections, but there are some indications in the poll that surviving an impeachment trial could provide a small net boost for Trump’s reelection effort.  However, many Democrats want to plow ahead with impeachment regardless of the political consequences.

Trump’s overall job rating stands at 40% approve and 53% disapprove, which is similar to his 41% to 50% rating in June. Over the past 12 months, the president’s approval rating has ranged between 40% and 44% in Monmouth’s polling while his disapproval rating has ranged between 49% and 54%.  The usual demographic clefts remain present – men are divided on the president’s job performance (49% approve and 43% disapprove) while women are decidedly negative (31% approve and 62% disapprove). White Americans without a college degree tend to approve of Trump (55% approve and 37% disapprove), while the reverse is true among white college graduates (38% approve and 57% disapprove).

“Donald Trump is not a popular president by most measures, but the appetite for impeachment remains low,” said Patrick Murray, director of the independent Monmouth University Polling Institute.

Just over a third (35%) of Americans feel that Trump should be impeached and compelled to leave the presidency while a clear majority (59%) disagree with this course of action. Support for the president’s removal via impeachment has ranged between 35% and 42% since Monmouth started asking this question in July 2017, with the current results at the low end of that range. Opposition to impeachment has been between 53% and 59% during the same time.

Overall, 41% of Americans say it is a good idea for the House Judiciary Committee to conduct an inquiry which may or may not lead to impeachment, but more (51%) say even this initial step is a bad idea. Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler confirmed the launch of an inquiry earlier this month. Most Democrats (72%) feel it is a good idea to go down this path, but only 39% of independents and just 8% of Republicans agree.  Among those who disapprove of the president’s job performance, fully two-thirds (69%) say it is a good idea to take this step, while just over 1-in-5 (22%) disagree.

Among those who feel an impeachment inquiry is a good idea, 18% cite a need to follow the evidence, 17% say Trump has broken the law, 17% point to Trump’s moral character, 16% cite the president’s policies as problematic, 11% express concerns about racism and immigration issues, 10% say Trump acts like he is above the law and needs to be held accountable, 9% want the transparency of a public inquiry, 7% say Trump is dishonest, and 7% say he is unfit or unqualified for the office.

Among those who say an impeachment inquiry is a bad idea, the top reasons include feeling that Trump has done nothing wrong (27%), it would be a waste of time and money (22%), the inquiry would be a partisan “witch hunt” (13%), Trump has done a good job as president (12%), and Congress should be working on other issues (10%).  There are some differences in these rationales, though, based on how poll respondents feel about the president’s overall job performance.  Among those who approve of Trump, the idea that he has done nothing wrong (34%) is the top reason for being negative toward an impeachment inquiry, followed by it being a waste of resources (22%), it is a partisan witch hunt (18%), Trump has done a good job in office (16%), Congress should be working on other things (11%), and the charges have already been investigated (7%).  Among those who disapprove of Trump but feel that an impeachment inquiry is a bad idea right now, 26% say it would be a waste of resources, 16% say it would backfire on the Democrats, 16% say it is too late in Trump’s term to start this process, 10% feel that Trump has not done anything impeachable, 10% say there is no point because the Senate won’t remove him, 8% say Congress should be focused on other issues, and 7% say an inquiry would be bad for the country.  Another 15% of this group offer general negative comments about Trump.


[O]nly 1-in-5 Americans think it is likely (6% very and 14% somewhat) that the Senate would actually vote to oust Trump if the House did pass articles of impeachment.  Another 25% say removal of the president by the Senate is not too likely and fully half (50%) say this outcome is not at all likely.  Even those who support impeachment admit that Trump’s removal is unlikely – just 33% of this group expect that the Senate would vote to convict on articles of impeachment, while 63% say this is not likely to happen.  Among those who oppose impeachment, only 11% say it would probably to lead to Trump’s removal from office while 83% say this outcome is not likely.

“Impeachment may not earn widespread support, but that does not mean most voters want to see Trump remain in office. It is just that the ballot box seems to be their preferred way to achieve his ouster,” said Murray.

A majority (57%) of registered voters say it is time to have someone new in the Oval Office, while just under 4-in-10 (39%) feel that Trump should be reelected in 2020. This is very similar to the 59% “someone new” and 37% reelect results in June, just before the official launch of the president’s reelection campaign.

In approximately 300 “swing” counties, accounting for about one-fifth of the total U.S. electorate, only 35% back the incumbent’s reelection compared with 60% who want a new occupant in the White House.  Since March, support for Trump’s reelection has ranged between 33% and 45% across these swing counties. In 2016, Trump lost the cumulative vote in these counties by just one percentage point.

In the nearly 2,500 “red” counties that Trump won by an average of 36 points in 2016, his current standing is a comparatively narrower 60% for reelection and 36% for someone new. In the remaining 360 “blue” counties that Hillary Clinton won by about 35 points on average, only 25% of voters support Trump for a second term while 72% want someone new.  Over the past five months, support for the president’s reelection has ranged between 51% and 60% in the “Trump counties” and between 21% and 25% in the “Clinton counties.”

These numbers are roughly consistent with other polling we have seen on the issue of impeachment over the past several months. In July, a ABC News/Washington Post poll, for example, found that 59% of Americans do not believe that Congress should go forward with an impeachment inquiry. A smaller percentage, just 37%, support moving forward with impeachment. Not surprisingly, these numbers vary depending on political party, with 61% of Democrats supporting impeachment while the vast majority of Republicans oppose the idea. Among independents, the level of opposition to impeachment is roughly the same as in the public as a whole. Additional polling at the end of July found that that the numbers had not shifted at all despite events such as Robert Mueller’s testimony before the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees. It’s also consistent with earlier polling which has indicated that the American public does not want to see Congress pursue impeachment at this time. Additionally, reports on the ground continue to show that Congressional Democrats who talked to constituents back home have found little support for immediate moves to impeach the President even among Democrats. Instead, these voters want to see Congress focused on health care reform and other issues of importance to the average voter. 

All of this comes at the same time that support for impeachment continues to grow among Democrats on Capitol Hill. At the start of the month, around the same time that Congress began its month-long summer recess, the number of House Democrats in favor of starting an impeachment inquiry officially passed the halfway point. That number has grown to the point where there are now at least 130 Democrats the list supporting impeachment (see the latest update here) and they are joined by nearly all the Democratic candidates for President. Despite this, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi continues to put the brakes on the idea, but one wonders how long that can last given the current situation.

The good sign for Democrats in this poll, of course, is the fact that a majority of Americans want to see Trump out of office and seem prepared to make it happen in 2020. This should serve as a signal to Democrats about where they ought to concentrate their efforts, and that would be laying the ground for defeating the President at the ballot box rather than engaging in a quixotic effort to impeach him that will end with an acquittal in the Senate that could arguably end up strengthening him politically. As I’ve noted before, this doesn’t mean that Democrats should let up the pressure on the Trump Administration:

[T]he better strategy for Democrats right now is to proceed forward with investigations into the matters discussed above and to do so in as public a manner as possible. Let all the information that can come out be made public unless it is classified. Let the American people decide at the next election what they want to do with that information. This seems like an even wiser strategy given the fact that it is unlikely that any investigations in the House will be completed until we’re nearly on the eve of the 2020 election. At that point, the question will be whether to proceed with impeachment or take the strategy I have laid out here and let the people decide. Unless the evidence against the President is overwhelming, it seems to me that the decision should lean heavily in favor of putting this matter to the test at the ballot box rather than attempting an impeachment and removal that will not succeed and which could end up energizing Trump and his base when the President is ultimately acquitted in the Senate.

Perhaps these investigations will result in a sea change that will cause voters to rise up and demand Congressional action. but until that happens Democrats would be wise to bide their time and build up the case against Trump to play a central role in the 2020 campaign as it inevitably will. At that point, the voters can decide how they wish to proceed.

FILED UNDER: Campaign 2020, Congress, Donald Trump, Impeachment, Politicians, Public Opinion Polls, US Politics
Doug Mataconis
About Doug Mataconis
Doug holds a B.A. in Political Science from Rutgers University and J.D. from George Mason University School of Law. He joined the staff of OTB in May 2010. Before joining OTB, he wrote at Below The BeltwayThe Liberty Papers, and United Liberty Follow Doug on Twitter | Facebook


  1. Teve says:

    27 percent said it’s because they think Trump has done nothing wrong

    I bet.

  2. michael reynolds says:

    If this story is confirmed there will be no way to avoid impeachment. The claim is that Trump took out loans with Deutsche Bank – a favorite of Russian money-launderers, along with the Bank of Cyprus, once run by Wilbur Ross – and that he had Russian oligarchs as co-signers.

    Three years now I’ve been saying Trump is owned by Putin, that there is no other plausible explanation for his behavior. Absolutely owned.

  3. @michael reynolds:

    O’Donnell and Maddow have both made claims like this in the past based on “sources” and they’ve never been substantiated.

  4. OzarkHillbilly says:

    @michael reynolds:

    that there is no other plausible explanation for his behavior.

    True, but as implausible as Chump is we can not rule out any implausible reasons for his behavior.

  5. michael reynolds says:

    @Doug Mataconis:
    Well, if the House manages to obtain the DB records I guess we’ll find out, won’t we?

    Let’s see just how panicky Trump’s Toilet Tweets are today.

  6. michael reynolds says:

    No, sorry, but that makes no sense. As stupid as Trump is he does not exclude every American from meetings with Putin without a reason. He had motive for doing something which on its face looks treasonous. He was taking a risk. He had a motive. It’s not hard to figure out that motive.

  7. OzarkHillbilly says:

    @michael reynolds:

    that makes no sense.

    As intended, but then trump makes no sense either.

    It’s not hard to figure out that motive.

    Right now it is impossible to figure out that motive. What isn’t hard is to make the very few known facts fit your preferred theory.

    Which for the record I find plausible.

  8. michael reynolds says:


    When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.

    For coming up on three years I’ve been asking Trump supporters for the innocent, plausible explanation for Trump’s insistence that no other American can be present when he meets with Putin. And for three years none of them has even tried to come up with an answer. That’s because there is no innocent explanation. In fact, it’s been obvious that there cannot be any innocent explanation.

    Having eliminated ‘innocent, plausible’ explanations, we are left with only the guilty explanation.

  9. Jen says:

    OT: The Queen has approved Boris Johnson’s request to suspend Parliament. A no deal Brexit just got a LOT more likely.

  10. Mikey says:

    @Jen: Gawd, the Brits are so fucked. And it’s so sad that so many who understood what a phenomenally idiotic idea Brexit is will get hurt.

    No doubt there will be another Scottish independence referendum, which will pass, and the UK will no longer be U.

    But hey, on the plus side, this may unite Ireland! Or reignite the Troubles. I guess we’ll see.

  11. gVOR08 says:

    27% believe Trumpsky has done nothing wrong? Really? Exactly 27%, the proverbial Crazification Factor?

  12. 95 South says:

    @michael reynolds: I never heard about this until you brought it up a week ago. I think that Trump sometimes didn’t bring a note-taker but always brought a translator, and at least once brought his wife. I also read that he met with Kim without a note-taker. You sure he’s never done this with any other leader?

  13. Fortunato says:

    @michael reynolds:
    Isn’t the money laundering, the close ties to and affection for oligarchs and despots, already baked in the multilayered cake of serial corruption that is Donny Two Scoop’s life?
    Do you really think his 42%, and the entirety of Republican party, would give two sh&ts about the DB or Cypress revelations?
    A two day story – tops – before Trump’s next scandal rolls out.
    Is it a crime s SURE! Is Bill Barr going to prosecute – F*&K NO!
    It’s important to recall all that Trump’s 42% and the entirety of the Republican party have chosen to willfully ignore.
    Like Trump’s super secret, note-confiscating sit-down with Kleptocrat Vlad, immediately prior to stepping in front of the world press to publicly trash all U.S. Intelligence agencies – while standing (submissively gesticulating) next to a smiling KGB Vlad.
    And of course there’s Trump University’s $25 Million fine for bending over and schtooping Mom & Pop wannabe entrepreneurs, a criminal act bothering not a single deplorable and raising the shackles of not a single GOP congresscritter.
    And we can’t ignore Trump’s 4000+ lawsuits, most of them resulting from Donny Two Scoop’s standard operating procedure of f*&cking every honest Mom & Pop contractor unfortunate enough to win a bid on a Trump job. Nearly every one of these small contractors then being forced to wade through Trump’s legion of unscrupulous lawyers in order to get paid – often years later and at a cut rate – for faithfully fulfilling their part of a contract.
    Well.. we normal folks can’t ignore these lawsuits, but you can rest assured the deplorables and the entire GOP surely can.
    And just this morning we find Marco Rubio, celebrating the possibility of a Trump Doral G-7! Going so far as to float the lie that, ‘why heck, Trump probably won’t even make much money on it’ (??!!).

    I’m with Mataconis – get the info out there, splice together some campaign ads from it – but at this late stage DON’T risk giving Trump a bump by launching impeachment proceedings that are guaranteed to fail and are certain to serve as a rallying cry for the GOP and their deplorables.

  14. Kathy says:

    @michael reynolds:

    I’ve given up. There is nothing, and I mean not any combination of actions and outcomes, that will result in enough Republicans turning against him. Therefore impeachment makes no logical sense.

    Better to oust him in the election, then prosecute him as prescribed by law.

  15. Scott F. says:


    And just this morning we find Marco Rubio, celebrating the possibility of a Trump Doral G-7!

    It won’t be enough to remove Trump from office. The objective must be to tie Trump to his GOP enablers and bring them ALL down hard. Protracted, public investigations – and Nadler’s right to call them impeachment inquiries for now – will serve that end as Republicans will have to play defense for the entire 2020 campaign season.

  16. gVOR08 says:

    @95 South:

    After meeting with Putin at the 2017 Group of 20 summit in Hamburg, Germany, Trump took his interpreter’s notes and told him not to discuss the meeting with anyone, including other U.S. officials, the Post reported.

    Taking the words from Reynolds’ mouth, what is the innocent explanation of this?

  17. Fortunato says:

    @Scott F.:
    The objective must be to tie Trump to his GOP enablers and bring them ALL down hard.

    100% agreement.
    The Republican party must be forever wed to Donald Trump.
    They must wear, permanently, the stain that is Donald Trump.

    As history (and the courts) unravel and record the lechery, wholesale incompetence and outright criminality that is Donald Trump – the Republican party must be forever lashed to and synonymous with this vile legacy.
    It is Republicans who enabled every miscreant act. Each and every one of them, complicit.

  18. CSK says:

    @michael reynolds: Trump is too busy Twitter-raging against Puerto Rico, the Fed, and Fox this a.m. to fret about DB.

  19. KM says:

    @95 South:
    What serious world leader has a meeting without someone taking notes? Every meeting I’ve ever been to, someone’s been jotting stuff down because it’s important to record details lest they be (1) misunderstood (2) misinterpreted, deliberately or not (3) forgotten or (4) legal reasons regarding clarity and transparency. Not writing things down during meetings is a BAD idea…. unless you are trying to achieve reasons 1-3 above on purpose.

    Not only that, the translator DID take notes – because that’s what professionals do – and Trump took them away. Why would you take the notes? You can’t even claim national security reasons since CLEARLY they had high enough clearance and were trusted enough to sit in on the meeting and officially translate for heads of state. So it must be the content that’s the source of concern….. which leads back to WHY a highly trusted employee of the government isn’t allowed to retain a record of a simple meeting that nothing of importance was supposed to be discussed at.

    Even *IF* he wasn’t dirty before, he is now with that. Something went down he didn’t want anyone to be able to prove and that’s not a good thing no matter what your political beliefs are.

  20. michael reynolds says:

    @95 South:
    Try reading actual news occasionally. You might be better informed.

    Trump is owned. Trump has betrayed this country and continues to do so. And dude if your defense is ‘I think he maybe also meets with Kim Jong Un alone’, I accept your surrender. You may keep your sword.

    But just so you understand how stupid your ‘defense’ is, when a POTUS meets a Putin without any other American present, Putin can tell any story he likes about the meeting. Because he’ll have a translator and a note-taker and probably an FSB operative backing him up, while your orange Jebus will have fck all.

    Can you see where that might be a national security problem? #Cult45

  21. Gustopher says:

    Most Americans Want Trump Gone, But Not By Impeachment

    As much as I love the idea of filling the Oval Office with rabid wolverines, the White House is filled with irreplaceable historical artifacts that would get damaged.

  22. Gustopher says:

    @michael reynolds: Walk us through it — what was the process Obama used, or George W. Bush used?

    I ask because some people don’t seem to get how unprecedented this is.

  23. 95 South says:

    @michael reynolds: Not surrendering. You said Trump was the only president to meet with Putin one on one, and he doesn’t meet with anyone else one on one. The first one might be true (although he sometimes brings someone). Can you back up the second one?

  24. Gustopher says:

    @Doug Mataconis:

    O’Donnell and Maddow have both made claims like this in the past based on “sources” and they’ve never been substantiated.

    Can you back that up with examples?

    They’ve tended to be very scrupulous, and even here, Lawrence O’Donnell was bending over backwards to reiterate that they only had once source, and to say “if this is true” repeatedly, stressing the “if”.

    I think it was irresponsible to actually go on air with something so thinly sourced (although, since we don’t know who the source was, it’s possible they have high confidence, but still..), but he did that irresponsible thing in the most responsible way possible.

  25. grumpy realist says:
  26. SenyorDave says:

    @michael reynolds: If this story is confirmed there will be no way to avoid impeachment. The claim is that Trump took out loans with Deutsche Bank – a favorite of Russian money-launderers, along with the Bank of Cyprus, once run by Wilbur Ross – and that he had Russian oligarchs as co-signers.

    I’d love to agree with you, but there are several times over the last two years where I have thought “that’s it, he’s gone”. It has become a standing joke with my wife, who has much less knowledge of politics than I do but apparently has better knowledge of human nature. She maintains if the Access Hollywood tape didn’t sink him nothing will. Trump is like a cockroach, he just won’t go away (apologies to cockroaches hwo, while disgusting, don’t deserve to be compared to Trump.

  27. Teve says:

    Lawrence O’Donnell is now saying that the information is not confirmed enough for him to go public with and he shouldn’t have put it on his show last night.

    Sucky thing is, if it’s true or not we won’t know for probably weeks or months.

  28. Mister Bluster says:

    Lawrence O’Donnell is now saying that the information is not confirmed enough for him to go public with and he shouldn’t have put it on his show last night.

    Thanks for nothing Lawrence. Maybe you should go work for Fox News.

  29. Mister Bluster says:

    @grumpy realist:..ants in their pants
    Can’t make your link work but did find this while searching Raw Story.
    Another reason to want Trump gone.
    These people are just pigs.

    Trump admin says children of US soldiers born overseas will no longer get automatic American citizenship
    Traditionally, U.S. military bases are considered to be part of American soil, but that will no longer be the case, according to President Donald Trump’s administration.
    According to the military site Task & Purpose, babies born to U.S. soldiers overseas will no longer be considered American citizens.

  30. Guarneri says:

    Lawrence ODonnell and Michael need to get a room. What next, Avennati for president?

  31. @michael reynolds:

    O’Donnell has retracted the report about Russians co-signing Trump’s loans

  32. 95 South says:

    @Doug Mataconis: That was a fun 24 hours.

  33. Kathy says:

    Assuming that Dennison did offer pardons to his staff if they break the law regarding work on the “wall,” and assuming one or more of these people go and break some law, and assuming all this can be proven in court naturally, could Dennison then be convicted for conspiracy?

    I don’t know all the legal niceties involved, but it seems that inducing someone to commit a crime ought to be a crime as well.

  34. 95 South says:

    @Kathy: Literally every day a new failed plan.

  35. Mister Bluster says:

    @Kathy:..inducing someone to commit a crime ought to be a crime as well.

    The “I was joking.” defense has been part of the legal canon since President Puke took office. That’s what the anonymous sources want you to believe.
    Of course today that just applied to “I’ll pardon you for getting your tit in a wringer.”
    As far as illegally taking private citizen’s property without due process Pud wasn’t joking about that as far as I can tell.
    The Republicans in the Senate will NEVER convict him of anything, craven lickspittles that they are.

  36. Theodor Blue Geisel says:

    The time has come,
    The time is now.
    Just go, go, go!
    I don’t care how.

    You can go by foot.
    You can go by cow.
    Donald J Trump,
    will you please go now!

    You can go on skates,
    you can go on skis.
    You can go in a hat.
    But please, go please!
    I don’t care.

    You can go by bike.
    You can go on a Zike-Bike
    if you like.

    If you like, you can go,
    in an old blue shoe,
    Just go, go go!
    Please do, do, do!

    Donald J Trump,
    I don’t care how.
    Donald J Trump,
    will you please go now?

    You can go on stilts,
    You can go by fish.
    You can go in a Crunk-Car
    if you wish.

    If you wish you may go
    by lion’s tail
    Or stamp yourself
    and go by mail.
    Donald J Trump!
    Don’t you know
    the time has come,
    so GO, GO, GO!

    Get on your way!
    Please, Donald J!
    You might like going
    in a Zumble-Zay!

    You can go by balloon…or broomstick.
    OR you can go by camel in a bureau drawer.
    You can go by bumble boat…or jet…
    I don’t care how you go, just GET!

    Get yourself a Ga-Zoom.
    You can go with a….BOOM!
    Donald, Donald, Donald,
    Will you leave this room!

    Donald J Trump, I don’t care HOW!
    Donald J Trump, will you please GO NOW!
    I said GO and GO I meant,
    The time had come.

    SO… Donald went and blamed everyone else, decided it would be better to pal around with Putin, and destroy the economy.

    … f’in’ jerk.

  37. Just nutha ignint cracker says:

    @KM: @michael reynolds: I think you and Reynolds are missing the point: 95 South and the rest of the MAGAots don’t give a f***. (Or are you feeding the troll for the sake of the supposed “uninformed lurkers” that have become nearly as famous as Nixon’s “great silent majority?”)

  38. Just nutha ignint cracker says:


    Sucky thing is, if it’s true or not we won’t ever know. for probably weeks or months.