No Secretary of Defense in Sight

The office has been vacant for 81 days. President Trump has yet to nominate a replacement.

When Jim Mattis resigned as Secretary of Defense in protest, he offered to stay on board until President Trump had time to get a replacement confirmed. The President, in my judgment, rightly decided that he couldn’t keep Mattis in the post after his scathing denunciation of the Commander-in-Chief and sent him packing on December 31. Three months after that announcement, however, Trump has yet to nominate a replacement.

Patrick Shanahan, the former Boeing executive who was Deputy Secretary of Defense, has been serving as the Acting Secretary for 81 days. This easily breaks the previous record of 60 days held by William Howard Taft IV from the beginning of the George H.W. Bush administration until Dick Cheney’s confirmation. In that case, though, we had a presidential transition and a long nomination battle for Senator John Tower, who was ultimately rejected by his former colleagues for the post.

In the current case, Trump has simply failed to nominate a replacement. There have been reports that Trump has offered to post to at least half a dozen candidates, including four Republican Senators, all of whom have rejected it for one reason or another. Recent reports that Trump had finally settled on just keeping Shanahan in the job on a permanent basis have now hit a new obstacle.

POLITICO (“Shanahan’s nomination to head Pentagon on ice“):

Patrick Shanahan’s expected promotion to permanently head the Defense Department has stalled amid an ethics investigation and a series of unimpressive public performances, according to four people with knowledge of internal White House discussions.

Shanahan, who has served as the Pentagon’s acting chief since Jim Mattis resigned in December, has also been hampered by the deadly crashes of two airliners manufactured by his former employer, Boeing — the company that’s also at the heart of his ethics problems.

The sources aware of the White House discussions believe Shanahan is still in the mix for the job, but they say recent events and his own missteps haven’t done him any favors with President Donald Trump. And some said his fate will remain uncertain until the Defense Department’s inspector general finishes a probe into allegations that Shanahan has privately boosted Boeing during meetings at the Pentagon.

With so much scrutiny on the crashes that killed a total of 346 people, it’s enough to have “the Boeing stench on you” to hurt chances for a nomination right now, a former Defense Department official told POLITICO.

“The IG investigation has slowed the process down and there are quite a few of us who want to see the report before moving forward, including President Trump,” a senior White House official said. “He’s paying close attention, as he has always done with those he’s considering for top positions.”

[…]

In addition to his Boeing ties, Shanahan’s prospects suffered because of his rocky performances at last month’s Munich Security Conference and at a Senate hearing last week, sources familiar with the deliberations said.

Two other sources, both senior Republican Capitol Hill aides, confirmed that Shanahan’s expected nomination has been delayed but said they did not know why.

Trump had been poised to nominate Shanahan after the Munich conference, according to the former Defense Department official and two Republican aides. And he was prepared to do it again after Shanahan’s appearance before the Senate Armed Services Committee, the two GOP aides said.

But Trump “cooled” on Shanahan after The Washington Post reported after the conference that the acting secretary had clashed with lawmakers over the president’s decision to pull all U.S. troops from Syria, the ex-Defense Department official said.

“There have been rumors of potential nominations every couple of days in the last eight weeks,” said a person close to Shanahan. “I personally have never seen any specific plan or intent from the White House that they were ready to go and pull the trigger. So far as I can tell it’s sort of a self-licking rumor ice cream cone.”

While some disagree, the consensus of legal analysts is that there’s no legal limit on how long Shanahan can hold the post in an acting capacity. He was confirmed by the Senate as Deputy Secretary and that post is designated by statute as the fill-in when the Secretary’s job is vacant. Politically, however, an acting secretary simply has less juice in the building because he’s seen as a caretaker.

FILED UNDER: Military Affairs, National Security
James Joyner
About James Joyner
James Joyner is a Security Studies professor at Marine Corps University's Command and Staff College and a nonresident senior fellow at the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security at the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer and Desert Storm vet. Views expressed here are his own. Follow James on Twitter @DrJJoyner.

Comments

  1. Mu says:

    Very telling that the second most prestigious cabinet post can’t attract a taker in the Trump era.
    But then, who wants a job where all important instructions are transmitted via Twitter?

  2. Moosebreath says:

    Well, who would want to serve under a President who knows more than all the generals?

  3. Mark Ivey says:

    Putin will let the President know who should be Sec of Defense..

    1
    2
  4. Mikey says:

    @Mu:

    But then, who wants a job where all important instructions are transmitted via Twitter?

    I think it’s even more so that any decision a Cabinet secretary makes could be undone with a Tweet, the latest example being the North Korea sanctions Trump reversed yesterday.

    America no longer has a real foreign policy–we have the whims and gripes and petty actions of a man who’s basically a cross between your average drunk uncle and a dementia patient.

  5. Who could have predicted that someone who clearly did not understand government would be a bad choice to head said government?

    5
    1
  6. Mister Bluster says:

    @Steven L. Taylor:..Who could have predicted that someone who clearly did not understand government would be a bad choice to head said government?

    65,853,514 electors who voted for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Presidential election. A plurality of 48.18% the popular vote over Kim Jong Un’s boyfriend and Putin’s lapdog.

    2
    1
  7. DrDaveT says:

    @Steven L. Taylor:

    Who could have predicted that someone who clearly did not understand government would be a bad choice to head said government?

    I am much less concerned by the millions who failed to correctly predict that than I am by the millions who still haven’t figured it out. It’s one thing to have voted for Trump; it’s a totally different and more horrifying thing to be ready to vote for him again, after seeing him in action.

  8. Gustopher says:

    I’ll do it.

    I have no appropriate skills or experience, but I think we can count on the Republican senate just rubber stamping my confirmation. And I can get pretty defensive.

    I won’t pay attention in cabinet meetings, I will make no real decisions and just defer to my underlings whenever possible. I will completely frustrate Democratic oversight by appearing before them and attempting to answer their questions truthfully and to the best of my incredibly limited ability.

    I think they should give me a shot. Happy to take some other cabinet level position, if that is more appropriate. HUD has a good leader n this mold, but there are outs of other cabinet positions.

    1
    1
  9. gVOR08 says:

    @DrDaveT: A testament to FOX and the rest of the RW media.

  10. Kathy says:

    @Gustopher:

    I have no appropriate skills or experience,

    This admission makes you morally overqualified for the Trumpian Horror Show. But thank you for playing, and better luck next time.

    1
    1