Retarded Convict Not Retarded
Jurors: Death Row Inmate Not Retarded (AP)
YORKTOWN, Va. – A death row inmate whose case led to the Supreme Court’s ban on executing the mentally retarded was found mentally competent by a Virginia jury Friday. A judge immediately scheduled his execution for December.
Basically, Daryl Atkins was convicted of murder but had his death sentence commuted by the Supreme Court (in Atkins v. Virginia) because the defense argued that he was retarded and thus execution would be cruel and unusual. Following the decision, the jury reconsidered the case, only to then judge Atkins “not retarded.” Classic.
This guy killed an enlisted Airman for beer money, so forgive me if I shed no tears over his execution.
Jurors in Virginia get to decide whether a murderer is retarded? What a, um, retarded system.
Surprisingly, the all-white jury decided the guy was bright enough to execute. Who would’ve thought?
By the time it’s appealed up again, Atkins will have been reversed.
Yup, and everyone knows that all white people are racists, driven only by their intense desire to lynch innocent black folk.
Atkins v. Virginia sent the case back to the lower level court to determine, via due legal process, whether or not Atkins was, in fact, retarded. The Supreme Courts did not decide that as a matter of fact and law, Atkins was retarded.
The jury, following the USSC’s order, reconsidered the case and found him to be not retarded. The process worked exactly as it was supposed to work. The results, however, disappointed some.
Well, hey, the guy may not *be* retarded; that’s fine. But down here in Mississippi, we aren’t naive enough to believe that race is irrelevant in capital trials. Sorry the rest of you haven’t caught up yet—best wishes!