Romney Clarifies Abortion Stance, Takes His Own Pledge

Mitt Romney sought to clarify his pro-life bona fides yesterday. But, will it matter?

In the wake of the mini-controversy that erupted over Mitt Romney’s decision not to sign an abortion pledge being circulated by a pro-life group, Mitt Romney has put forward his own pledge in National Review:

I am pro-life and believe that abortion should be limited to only instances of rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother.

I support the reversal of Roe v. Wade, because it is bad law and bad medicine. Roe was a misguided ruling that was a result of a small group of activist federal judges legislating from the bench.

I support the Hyde Amendment, which broadly bars the use of federal funds for abortions. And as president, I will support efforts to prohibit federal funding for any organization like Planned Parenthood, which primarily performs abortions or offers abortion-related services.

I will reinstate the Mexico City Policy to ensure that nongovernmental organizations that receive funding from America refrain from performing or promoting abortion services, as a method of family planning, in other countries.  This includes ending American funding for any United Nations or other foreign assistance program that promotes or performs abortions on women around the world.

I will advocate for and support a Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act to protect unborn children who are capable of feeling pain from abortion.

And perhaps most importantly, I will only appoint judges who adhere to the Constitution and the laws as they are written, not as they want them to be written.

So why, then, wouldn’t Romney sign the Susan B. Anthony List’s pledge? Here’s what Romney says about that:

[The] pledge is overly broad and would have unintended consequences. That is why I could not sign it. It is one thing to end federal funding for an organization like Planned Parenthood; it is entirely another to end all federal funding for thousands of hospitals across America. That is precisely what the pledge would demand and require of a president who signed it.

The pledge also unduly burdens a president’s ability to appoint the most qualified individuals to a broad array of key positions in the federal government. I would expect every one of my appointees to carry out my policies on abortion and every other issue, irrespective of their personal views.

Like Steven Taylor, I tend to think that any pledges like this are essentially pointless.  In this particular case, neither this National Review piece nor signing the original pledge seem to me to be acts that would assuage the doubts that hard-line social conservatives have about Romney when it comes to this particular issue. The idea that Romney is a “flip flopper” that developed during the 2008 campaign originated with his position on abortion which changed from the largely pro-choice positions in took in previous races in Massachusetts to the adamant pro-life position he espouses today. If they had doubts about Mitt Romney in 2008, pro-life conservatives are going to have doubts about Romney now regardless of how many pledges he signs.

This will come up in the GOP race in the future, I’m sure, especially in Iowa where evangelicals hold a lot of sway over the Republican Party. In the end, though, I have to wonder if it’s really going to have that much of an impact anyway because the people who are truly fanatical on this issue weren’t going to support Romney in the primaries to begin with.

 

FILED UNDER: Campaign 2012, US Politics,
Doug Mataconis
About Doug Mataconis
Doug holds a B.A. in Political Science from Rutgers University and J.D. from George Mason University School of Law. He joined the staff of OTB in May 2010. Before joining OTB, he wrote at Below The BeltwayThe Liberty Papers, and United Liberty Follow Doug on Twitter | Facebook

Comments

  1. PJ says:

    Romney says he’s going to support prohibiting federal funding for Planned Parenthood, a organization that doesn’t use any federal funding for abortions. But his own health care reform, RomneyCare, pays for abortions.

    Does the man have any actual convictions?

  2. Van says:

    Romney hops on the John Kyl “not a factual statement” bandwagon with this:
    “Planned Parenthood, which primarily performs abortions or offers abortion-related services.” WRONG.

  3. Davod says:

    Romney is a slippery character.

    “Planned Parenthood’s income break-down for 2006-2007 fiscal year
    PP clinic income: $356.9 million
    PP Government grants and contracts: $336.7 million
    Total profit: $114.8 million
    Total income: $1.02 billion

    2006 Planned Parenthood service numbers
    Number of abortions (medical and surgical): 289,750
    Total number of abortions per week: 5,572
    Adoption referrals: 2,410
    Ratio of adoption referrals to abortions: 1 per 120

    2007 Planned Parenthood Annual Survey
    Total number of PP clinics: 855
    Total number of non-express clinics: 814
    Express clinics: 41
    Total number of PP clinics that perform surgical and/or medical abortions: 287
    Total number of affiliates: 108
    Number of clinics that started doing abortions in 2007: 55

    Other random information
    Highest number of PP non-express clinics: 938 in 1995
    Total number of PP clinics in 2006: 859
    Number of states that do NOT give money to PP: 6 according to 2006 ALL study

    Percentages of U.S. Females, Age 15-44, Broken Down by Race (According to 2000 U.S. Census)

    Whites: 64.7%
    Blacks: 12.3%
    Hispanic or Latino: 12.4%
    Other: 10.6%

    Percentages of U.S. Women Who Obtained Abortions, Broken Down by Race (According to Center of Disease Control, 2004)

    Whites: 54.1%
    Blacks: 38.2%
    Other: 7.7% ”

    http://www.all.org/article/index/id/MjQ0NQ

  4. Hey Norm says:

    If he wants to get the nomination Romney certainly must pander to the small government folks who want government to control the uteruses of America.