If Gaddafi Stays In Power, Then What’s The Point Of Intervention?
U.S. officials are making clear that the current mission in Libya may not lead to the end of Muammar Gaddafi’s rule. If that’s the case, then why are we there in the first place?
U.S. officials are making clear that the current mission in Libya may not lead to the end of Muammar Gaddafi’s rule. If that’s the case, then why are we there in the first place?
Did President Obama pull off a diplomatic masterstroke? Or is he muddling through?
America is about to enter a third war in the Muslim world with no clear idea of the end game.
The Obama Administration is asking the U.N. Security Council to authorize direct military intervention in Libya. The question is, why now?
Establishing a no-fly zone isn’t likely to be enough to remove the current Libyan regime from power.
The uprisings in the Arab world have led some to suggest that the Middle East isn’t “ready” to be free. They’re wrong.
The situation in Libya continues to be grim as Gaddafi lashes out while power slips through his fingers.
Calls are coming from both sides of the aisle for the U.S. to do “something” about the situation in Libya. It would be better if we didn’t get involved.
Calls are growing for outside intervention in Libya but it’s unclear what can, or should, be done.
Muslim cleric Yusuf al-Qaradawi has issued a fatwa against Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi.
The crackdown in Libya is turning into a massacre.
The Gaddafi regime is facing its most serious challenge in its 41 year history.