Obama Losing To Generic Republican, Doing Better Against Actual Republicans

A new Gallup poll has "Generic Republican" beating President Obama. Unfortunately, the GOP won't be able to nominate this anonymous candidate.

A new Gallup poll shows President Obama trailing a generic Republican candidate for President by five points:

Forty-four percent of registered voters say they are more likely to vote for “the Republican Party’s candidate” and 39% for Barack Obama in the 2012 presidential election, according to Gallup’s June update. The current five-percentage-point edge for the generic Republican is not a statistically significant lead, and neither side has held a meaningful lead at any point thus far in 2011.

These results are based on a June 9-12 Gallup poll. The competitiveness of the race is underscored by the fact that Obama’s re-election prospects on this measure did not appear much better in May, when his approval rating rose to the 50% level. Now that the rally in support for Obama is essentially over, the president appears to be in a slightly weaker position but still very competitive with his as-yet-unnamed opponent.

Voters’ uncertainty about what they might do in the 2012 election is also apparent in the 18% who do not have a preference for Obama or the Republican at this point.

While this sounds like good news for the GOP, there are a couple caveats worth noting. First of all, history suggests that there’s very little predictive value to this type of poll seventeen months before Election Day:

Gallup asked similar generic ballot questions leading up to the 1992 and 2004 elections, when an incumbent president (George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush, respectively) was seeking re-election but his likely opponent was unknown, given that there was not an obvious front-runner in the Democratic primaries in those years.

In June 1991 and June 2003, both Bushes held wide leads over their generic Democratic opponents. At those times, both presidents were quite popular, with the elder Bush averaging 72% approval in June 1991 and the younger Bush 62% approval in June 2003. Obama averaged 46% approval during the most recent week of Gallup Daily tracking.

Neither June generic ballot result was highly predictive of the eventual outcome; the elder Bush was defeated for re-election and the younger Bush won a narrow victory.

Second, there’s the simple fact that if you put the President up against an actual Republican, instead of just a generic opponent, he  beats every one of them in every poll right now. This is despite a declining approval rating, increasing economic pessimism, and the fact that nearly 2/3 of the country believes we are on the wrong track. Moreover, this one poll is contradicted by other “Obama v. Generic Republican” polls that show very different results:

So this one Gallup poll may not mean very much at all.

Gallup ends its analysis this way:

Regardless of whom Republicans nominate, if national conditions improve, as was the case from 1983 to 1984 and 1995 to 1996, Obama could win re-election easily. If they do not, as occurred between 1979 and 1980, or get worse, as happened from 1991 to 1992, he could be vulnerable to defeat by whomever the Republicans nominate.

In other words, if you want an idea of how the election might turn out, watch the economic statistics and ignore this poll.

 

FILED UNDER: Barack Obama, Campaign 2012, Politicians, US Politics
Doug Mataconis
About Doug Mataconis
Doug holds a B.A. in Political Science from Rutgers University and J.D. from George Mason University School of Law. He joined the staff of OTB in May 2010. Before joining OTB, he wrote at Below The BeltwayThe Liberty Papers, and United Liberty Follow Doug on Twitter | Facebook

Comments

  1. Ken says:

    But can Generic Republican survive the scrutiny of a campaign? I hear he has some issues.

  2. Neil Hudelson says:

    Just wait until Generic talks about what to do about medicare.

  3. PJ says:

    Generic Republican is living next door to Saint Reagan and Santa Claus.

  4. Wayne says:

    As I have been saying any poll at this stage is not a very reliable indicator of much of anything that will happen. They are just interesting discussion points for political junkies.

    So as a political junkie here is my speculation on what they mean. First the generic poll indicates that once the GOP nominates their candidates the opposing campaigns will get behind that nominee. Right now they are trying to make the case the opposing candidates can’t beat Obama which hurt GOP in head to head matchups. The polling of the eventual nominee will get closer to the generic numbers.

    As for the second polling example, it shows that incumbent Presidents poll higher at this time than the eventual outcome. It would be more pertinent if Clinton and Carter polls at this time were included. Regardless if his polls are worst than the Bush’s at this time, it could indicate problems for Obama.

    Bush Sr. last year in office had a improving economy yet he lost. So yes the economy is important but if it does goes up(which I hope it does) it doesn’t mean Obama will be reelected.

  5. michael reynolds says:

    BREAKING: Mitt Romney files paperwork for name change.

  6. ratufa says:

    “Generic Republican” sounds like what you’d get if you averaged together all of Romney’s political positions over his career. Just give him some time to drift towards the center after the pre-convention pandering is over and he’ll be set.

    Though, it’s way too early to make any firm predictions.

  7. Jib says:

    This just shows a truism in presidential elections. During most of a presidents term, if you ask people if they would re-elect the president, they answer the question by asking themselves ‘Is the president doing a good job’. But once a nominee is selected to run against the president, the question shifts to ‘which one of these 2 people do I want to be president’. Depending on the nominee that can be a fundamentally different question.

    Republicans have moved way to the right, far out of the mainstream. To me, at this point they look a lot like the democrats in the 70’s and 80’s. Dominated by a strong but extreme activist grass roots that make it very hard to win nationally even if they do win a lot of local races.

  8. hey norm says:

    Ummmm…there are no actual Republicans running. Just sayin’

  9. Eric Florack says:

    The reason for the disparity between generic republicans and ones that currently are in the race, is that those that are in the race to do not reflect republican values , save one, who has been under attack already for the last four years by the liberals the press and the GOP establishment.