Polling Shows Justin Trudeau In Political Trouble Amid Still-Unfolding Scandal

Canada must have a Federal Election by late October, and the polls are showing that Prime Minister Trudeau could be in political trouble.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau finds himself in political trouble in the wake of a political scandal that has been quietly developing north of the border:

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s sunny days have become a little greyer in Quebec.

With the federal election less than three months away, a new poll shows the Conservative Party gaining ground and running neck and neck with the Liberals in a province that was key to Trudeau’s win in 2015.

Andrew Scheer’s Conservatives are polling particularly well among those who propelled the Coalition Avenir Québec into power in the last provincial election, and those who live in the Quebec City region.

At the same time, the environment remains the top concern among residents of the province.

The Forum Research poll of 977 Quebecers taken in late July shows that 30 per cent would vote for the Liberals if a federal election was held today, while 28 per cent would support the Conservatives. The Bloc Québécois garnered 15 per cent of the vote, while 10 per cent said they would vote for the Green Party and 9 per cent for the NDP. The fledgling People’s Party of Canada, led by Maxime Bernier, took 4 per cent of the vote.

In a similar poll taken June 11-12 in Quebec, 32 per cent said they would vote Liberal, and 25 per cent chose the Conservatives. Support for the NDP, Green Party and Bloc remained stable.

“The gap between the Liberals and Conservatives is narrowing in Quebec and that is bad news for the Liberals,” said Lorne Bozinoff, president of Forum Research. “The Liberals need a strong showing in Quebec and Ontario to win government, and a strong Conservative Party and a resurgent Bloc make that much, much more difficult.”
Quebec was a key factor in Trudeau’s victory in the October 2015 election.

The Liberals’ took 40 of 78 seats in the province, surpassing expectations. Trudeau won 36 per cent of the popular vote in Quebec, the NDP 25 per cent, the Bloc 19 per cent, the Conservatives 17 per cent, and the Greens three per cent.

In the latest poll, support for the Liberals was strongest in Montreal, garnering 41 per cent of the vote compared to 17 per cent for the Conservatives. Support for Scheer was strongest in the Quebec City region, where he took 48 per cent of voters’ intended votes. In the rest of Quebec, the Conservatives were ahead of the Liberals by 6 per cent, representing a gain over June’s poll, when the Conservatives only had a 3-per-cent lead over the Liberals.

(…)

A separate poll of 1,733 Canadians showed the Conservatives pulling ahead of the Liberals nationally, with 34 per cent favouring Scheer and 31 per cent saying they would vote for Trudeau if the election was today. The Greens and the NDP each scored 12 per cent, and the Bloc and the PPC garnered 5 per cent.

Trudeau’s approval rating was 34 per cent, while his disapproval rating was 55 per cent. Scheer had 27 per cent who said they approved of him and 48 per cent saying they disapproved.

Quebecers said the environment was the most important issue for them heading into the federal elections on Oct. 19, with 31 per cent listing it as their leading concern, followed by the economy (22 per cent) and health care (15 per cent).

Other recent polls showed similar figures nationally, but a different picture for Quebec, with the Liberals leading by at least 10 points. A Léger/Canadian Press web survey taken July 19-23 had the Liberals with 37 per cent of voter intentions in Quebec, and the Conservatives at 24 per cent. In Ontario, the parties were tied with 36 per cent of the vote, while in Alberta the Conservatives had 59 per cent support and the Liberals 24 per cent.

In a similar vein, the Toronto Star reports that the Liberal and Conservative parties are essentially tied nationally:

OTTAWA—The federal Liberals and Conservatives are running at a statistical tie nationally with less than three months to go before the national election, according to the latest numbers from Forum Research.

Forum’s July horse race numbers put the Conservatives at 34 per cent of decided and leaning voters, while the Liberals enjoy the support of 31 per cent of respondents. The numbers are essentially unchanged from Forum’s June numbers, but a far cry from the strong lead the Conservatives saw between March 2018 and April 2019.

The New Democrats and Green party remain deadlocked at 12 per cent each, while the Bloc Québécois and the upstart People’s Party of Canada both command 5 per cent of decided and leaning voters.

A big part of the Conservatives’ national lead is their very strong performance in the Prairies, according to Forum Research President Lorne Bozinoff.

But the Liberals continue to enjoy a lead in vote-rich Ontario (36 per cent to the Conservatives’ 31 per cent) and Québec (34 per cent to 23 per cent), making Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer’s path to the prime minister’s office more difficult.

Based on Forum’s projections, if an election were to be held today, the Conservatives would win 152 seats in the House of Commons and the Liberals would take 150. The NDP would retain 22 seats and the Green party would take three — a modest number, but still a historic breakthrough for Elizabeth May’s party. The Bloc Québécois would finish with 11 MPs, while Maxime Bernier’s PPC would fail to pick up a single seat.

That would mean a minority parliament, with the balance of power resting with the progressive New Democrats and Greens. It would also mean Scheer’s odds of forming government would be much longer.

“It’s hard to see (the Conservatives) getting enough to get a majority with another party, given that it is the three progressive parties that really will be holding the balance of power,” said Bozinoff of his projections.

The close race in the lead up to the election has political observers and partisans expecting the parties’ campaigns to matter even more than usual.

British Columbia remains difficult to project, both for pollsters and for politicos. Forum puts the Conservatives’ support in the province at 38 per cent to the Liberals’ 23 per cent, but the potential for four-way vote splits among the major parties makes the province’s lower mainland a bit chaotic electorally.

All of this is consistent with other national polling that has taken place over the past several months showing a tight race nationally between Trudeau’s Liberal Party and the Conservative Party which is currently led by Andrew Scheer, a Member of Parliament from Saskatchewan first elected in 2004 and re-elected to the riding of Regina Qu’Appelle from 2006 going forward. These polls are important because, as a matter of law, there must be a new Federal Election on or before October 22, 2019, and the polling indicates that, as of now, neither of Canada’s two major parties would walk away with enough seats to form a majority. This would mean that there would either be a minority government, a hung Parliament, or that one of the parties would be required to enter into a coalition agreement with one of the minor parties. This last alternative would seem to benefit Trudeau since the major lesser party, the New Democrats, tend to be to the left in the Canadian political spectrum and are more likely to agree to a governing agreement with the Liberals than the Conservatives.

This battle in the polls is taking place in the context of a scandal that has slowly been evolving north of the border that could not possibly have come at a worse time for Trudeau politically. The Wall Street Journal has an excellent article summarizing what has happened. Unfortunately, that article is behind a paywall. Basically, though involves the connections between Trudeau and those around him and an engineering firm called SNC-Lavalin. The scandal itself dates back to before Trudeau became Prime Minister to a lawsuit filed by law enforcement charging the company with corruption and fraud regarding its dealings with the Libyan government over a ten-year period from 2001 to 2011. This, of course, was a period when the country was still ruled by Muammar Gadhafi and his cohorts. After these charges were filed, the company threatened to move its headquarters from Montreal to London, England.

Trudeau apparently personally intervened in the matter, citing the fact that the move could cost as many as 9,000 jobs as well as economic dislocation for businesses that relied on SNC-Lavalin. Due to the fact that there is a record of a long lobbying record between the company and Trudeau and other top Liberal Party officials has led some to allege that Trudeau’s personal involvement and the allegation that he pressured Canada’s Attorney General to settle the above-referenced lawsuit without going to trial. As a result, the allegation has been that Trudeau and other party officials were trying to get a favorable resolution of the lawsuit to advance the party’s interests in placating a corporation that had been a supporter in the past.

So far, Trudeau has given no indication of when he might call a national election, but that is going to have to happen soon. This polling seems to make clear that it couldn’t come at a worse time for Trudeau’s political future.

FILED UNDER: World Politics, , , , , ,
Doug Mataconis
About Doug Mataconis
Doug holds a B.A. in Political Science from Rutgers University and J.D. from George Mason University School of Law. He joined the staff of OTB in May 2010. Before joining OTB, he wrote at Below The BeltwayThe Liberty Papers, and United Liberty Follow Doug on Twitter | Facebook

Comments

  1. Pylon says:

    A tighter race is a vast improvement for Trudeau. He’s been way behind in the last year.

  2. Guarneri says:

    Speaking of scandal. AOC’s Chief of Staff is under federal investigation. Heh.

    4
    9
  3. Mister Bluster says:

    The best people…Heh.

    Michael Flynn, Trump’s national security adviser, on one count of lying to the FBI
    Rick Gates, Trump’s former deputy campaign manager and Manafort protégé, on one count of conspiracy against the United States and one count of making false statements to FBI agents
    George Papadopoulos, a low-level Trump foreign policy adviser, for making false statements to the FBI about his contacts with Russians during the campaign
    Michael Cohen, Trump’s former lawyer and fixer, who pleaded guilty to lying to Congress about a possible Trump Organization real estate project in Moscow that was under consideration during the 2016 presidential campaign.
    Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chair, who pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy against the US and one count of conspiracy to obstruct justice.

    6
    5
  4. @Mister Bluster:

    and

    @Guarneri:

    Just a reminder that off-topic comments are generally discouraged by our comment policy.@

  5. Mister Bluster says:

    I guess I thought that since the word scandal was in the headline and political trouble in the sub head that I was close enough.
    I forgot that this is not Horseshoes or Hand Grenades.

    4
    1
  6. Pete S says:

    @Pylon: Pretty much as soon as Doug Ford became premier in Ontario and started implementing the PC agenda the national PC ratings started dropping. Although they deny it there is a reason that the Ontario government has been sent on vacation for a few months to get past the federal election, the more changes Ford brings in Ontario the harder it is for the federal Conservatives to win.

    3
    3
  7. michael reynolds says:

    Imagine if that ‘scandal’ was all we had to deal with. Imagine if Trump were only that dirty. We’d be singing hosanna in the streets.

    3
    3
  8. michael reynolds says:

    @Guarneri:
    Hey, I have a whole new question for you that you won’t be able to answer because you’re a brain-dead cultie:

    If Trump’s racist rhetoric had nothing to do with #WhiteTerror, how come he’s deleting his posts calling asylum seekers ‘an invasion’?

    Come on, give it a try, Drew. It’s fun letting people see just how empty you are as a man.

    3
    5
  9. Pylon says:

    @Pete S: That’s true. The other thing about the article is that the SNC Lavalin scandal is now months and months old, and IMO reached its peak a long time ago. It’s actually died down to a large extent.

  10. ed pyett says:
  11. ed pyett says:

    @Mister Bluster:

    will you move to Somalia with Rosie and Cher when Trump wins again in 2020?

    1
    1
  12. michael reynolds says:

    @ed pyett:
    You the same ‘Ed Pyett” who wrote:

    100% Of US Warming Is Due To NOAA Data Tampering
    NASA Exposed in ‘Massive’ New Climate Data Fraud
    NOAA Fiddles With Climate Data To Erase The 15-Year Global Warming ‘Hiatus’

    You’re nuts. Why not find another place to be nuts?

    3
    2
  13. Not the IT Dept. says:

    This coverage is way out of date. CPC peaked a few months ago. LPC moving back up. Momentum does count.

  14. ltmcdies says:

    @Not the IT Dept.: thank you. The SNC thing was MONTHS ago and there’s been nothing new. Not to mention every time Andrew Scheer opens his mouth in public these days he looses a polling percentage point