Poll: Most Blame Obama For Weak Economy
A new poll indicates that President Obama continues to be hampered by the state of the economy:
Two-thirds of likely voters say the weak economy is Washington’s fault, and more blame President Obama than anybody else, according to a new poll for The Hill.
It found that 66 percent believe paltry job growth and slow economic recovery is the result of bad policy. Thirty-four percent say Obama is the most to blame, followed by 23 percent who say Congress is the culprit. Twenty percent point the finger at Wall Street, and 18 percent cite former President George W. Bush.
The results highlight the reelection challenge Obama faces amid dissatisfaction with his first-term performance on the economy.
The poll, conducted for The Hill by Pulse Opinion Research, found 53 percent of voters say Obama has taken the wrong actions and has slowed the economy down. Forty-two percent said he has taken the right actions to revive the economy, while six percent said they were not sure.
(…)
Obama’s campaign, under the slogan “Forward,” has sought to steer voter attention less toward current and past economic performance and more toward questions about Republican Mitt Romney’s work in the private sector economy. It has launched attacks on the challenger’s role as head of the private equity firm Bain Capital, casting him as a jobs “outsourcer” whose firm shipped thousands of U.S. positions overseas.
The Hill Poll, however, shows the extent to which voters hold Obama responsible for the economy and reveals his vulnerability should the election become primarily a referendum on his economic management.
This isn’t surprising, Presidents always get an arguably unfair amount of the blame and/or credit for the state of the economy. However, it is reality whether its fair or not and is largely the reason that the Obama campaign is so obviously eager to change the subject on the campaign trail away from the state of the economy and to anything having to do with Mitt Romney. Whether it will work in the face of increasingly depressing economic statistics is an open question.
Sooner or later, if you’re in charge, you own it. Unless you’re Jamie Dimon, of course.
The headline, which I know was taken from The Hill, is not very truthful:
Blame is an entirely different thing than post-hoc analysis. Most people, sane people, would only “blame” if they were sure they had a better idea at the time and were sure Obama himself rejected it.
No, to complete that thought, what sane person who fully understands the global aftermath of the credit crisis, slowdowns in Europe and Asia, believes they had a magic bullet in 2009 or 2010 that would have made it all better?
Shorter: I expect anyone, even Obama supporters, can name an action he should have done “better,” but you can’t equate that to “blaming him for the weak economy.”
@Doug Mataconis:
Pulse Opinion Research? You do know what that is?
Uh, doesn’t this
Contradict this:
Well, lessee. 34% blame Obama, 61% blame other actors. Doesn’t this mean that the majority blames other actors, not Obama?
@sam:
Yes, I should have picked that part up. The 34% directly refutes the headline.
The 53% is measuring something else, and the numbers cannot be swapped.
The headline was a result of me misreading the poll, I’ve fixed it.
The fact remains that Obama receives more blame for the state of the economy than any other single actor
@Doug Mataconis:
Considering what Pulse Opinion Research is, not sure what this poll is worth…
@Doug Mataconis:
Dude, 34% is not most.
“Most” is actually a statistics word equal to “majority.”
“More” would be barely acceptable, as it would show the relative blame with Congress.
The most truthful story would seek out who the actual majority “blame.”
I’d guess that they are smart enough to “blame” global economic conditions.
John,
Again, “more than any other single actor.” I’ll stick with my choice of words.
Nate Silver wrote a good read about Romney’s edge from likely voter polls a couple of days ago:
Rasmussen/Pulse Opinion Research has no problem using likely voter screens almost two years before an election. I wonder why…
@Doug Mataconis:
I was speaking of your “new” title.
Poll: Most Blame Obama For Weak Economy
That would still be false.
@Doug Mataconis:
BTW, I called “more than any other single actor” barely acceptable, and said:
“The most truthful story would seek out who the actual majority ‘blame.'”
If we are making a big deal of “sticking to words” I’ll stick with those.
11% say A, 10% say B, 10% say C, 10% say D, 10% say E, 10% say F, 10% say G, 10% say H, 10% say I, and 9% say J.
“Poll: Most People Say A”
John’s right, Doug. Your new headline, while not as misleading as the first, is still misleading.
If I said that most of New York City is underwater, and, in response to a question, said, “Well, 34% percent is underwater” — would you think that most of New York City is underwater?
It’s a good thing 34% “blame” Obama!
I think that this is correct.
As soon as I saw it was a “The Hill” poll, I knew to take it with a grain of salt.
@Ben Wolf:
Or Mitt Romney.
False Headline Alert
According to the article, blame =
34% Obama
23% Congress
20% Wall Street
18% GW Bush
Since when is 34% most of the blame here?
It’s not Obama’s fault. He’s just a President.
Here we go again. Doug citing Hill citing Pulse without mentioning that Pulse=Rasmussen is exactly what he did last year, here. It’s also what Joyner did just a couple of weeks ago, here. So I guess this is going to keep happening.
And this is aside from the phony headline. Say Doug, Pew recently reported that 44% say “raising taxes on incomes above $250,000 would help the economy.” That answer (“help economy”) was the most popular answer. Compare it to the other answers:
22% Hurt economy
24% No difference
11% Don’t know
Consider this headline:
You would accept that as an honest headline? Really?
In the poll there are four named choices {Obama, George Bush, Congress, Wall Street} and not sure.
1. Very few Democrats will blame Obama and very few Republicans will blame Bush.
2. While congress approval ratings really don’t really differ between Republicans and Democrats, from polling, Republicans are more in favor of obstruction than cooperation than Democrats, so it would seem that they wouldn’t be nearly as willing to blame Congress as Democrats would be.
3. From other polling, Democrats have a clearly more negative view of Wall Street than Republicans have.
Thus Democrats, and D leaning independents will end up splitting their blame among more of the choices.
So, even if this poll had been made by a pollster without an agenda, I would have been amazed if Obama didn’t have the highest percentage.
It’s a badly constructed question. (Or good, depending on your view.)
It’s noteworthy that Doug does not mention who is responsible for the poll in his post. You have to follow the link, and even after that, you have to know what Pulse is about. Then there is the pretzel logic behind the post title.
Still, Doug is sticking with his misleading BS. Good boy. Can they make you roll over and do other tricks too?
“Doug is sticking with his misleading BS.”
It’s called implausible deniability.