Van Attack Outside London Mosque Kills One, Injures Ten, In Apparent Anti-Muslim Attack

A van struck a crowd outside a London mosque late last night in an attack by a man who said he wanted to kill Muslims.

London Mosque Attack

Late last night, a van struck a crowd of people leaving a mosque in London, killing at least one person and injuring ten:

A van plowed into a group of Muslim worshipers leaving prayers at a pair of north London mosques early Monday, leaving one person dead and injuring 10 others in what is being called a “terrorist attack.”

Witnesses said the driver of the vehicle was heard shouting that he wanted to kill Muslims.

“This is being treated as a terrorist attack,” said Metropolitan Police Deputy Assistant Commissioner Neil Basu told reporters. He added that the driver of the van was arrested on suspicion of murder.

The latest terrorist attack in London — the third in three months — was “every bit as sickening” as those that have come before, said British Prime Minister Theresa May. She hailed the “bravery” of locals for detaining the driver at the scene in the north London district of Finsbury Park.

“Hatred and evil of this kind will never succeed,” she said.

The attack unfolded as Muslims finished nighttime prayers during the holy month of Ramadan. The incident occurred near two mosques: the Finsbury Park Mosque and the Muslim Welfare House.

Abdulrahman Aidroos and his friends were attending to an elderly man who had collapsed on the ground when suddenly he saw a man in a van driving “straight into us.”

The driver of the van jumped out of the vehicle and tried to run, Aidroos said.

“I tackled him on the floor until the police came,” he told the BBC. “When he was running, he said ‘I want to kill more people, I want to kill more Muslims,'” he said.

“When I got him on the ground, I said, ‘Why are you doing this?’ He said, ‘I want to kill more Muslims.'”

Hussain Ali, 28, told the Press Association, a British news agency, that the leader of the mosque told the crowd “do not touch him” as they waited for the police to arrive.

A witness, who gave his name as Adil Rana, said the attacker tried to taunt onlookers as he was arrested.

“He said, ‘I’d do it again,'” Rana told The Washington Post. “It was a premeditated attack. He picked this area well and he knows Finsbury Park is predominantly a Muslim area.”


On Monday, police said that all of the victims outside the mosque were from the Muslim community, but it was “too early to tell” if the man who died at the scene did so as a result of the attack. The man who died was receiving first aid before the incident, they said.

In a statement, police said eight people were hospitalized while two others were treated at the scene.

Police said they had deployed extra officers “to reassure communities, especially those observing Ramadan.”

London Mayor Sadiq Khan, the city’s first Muslim mayor, called the incident a “horrific terrorist attack,” which was “clearly a deliberate attack on innocent Londoners, many of whom were finishing prayers during the holy month of Ramadan.”

“While this appears to be an attack on a particular community, like the terrible attacks in Manchester, Westminster and London Bridge it is also an assault on all our shared values of tolerance, freedom and respect,” he said in a statement.

This attack comes just about two weeks after an attack by vehicle in Central London that left six dead and dozens injured in an attack that was committed by a British-born Muslim man who apparently was inspired by ISIS in his attack, and some three months after another attack just steps from the buildings housing Parliament that resulted in three dead and about two dozen injured. Sandwiched in between those two attacks, of course, was the deadly bombing outside a Manchester arena that resulted in the death of twenty-two people and the wounding of hundreds of people. The difference here, of course, is that the attacker is not Muslim and appears to have been directed in his attack by a hatred for Muslims. Given the circumstances it would appear that he staged the attack to mimic recent events as part of some perverted sense of revenge for the attacks that have taken place in London over the past three months. Fortunately, the damage done by his attack was less extensive than those previous attacks and his capture means that we’ll be able find out more about his motivation and whether he was assisted in any way by other people who may be plotting similar revenge attacks against innocent Muslims.

The fact that this was an apparent revenge attack raises some rather obvious concerns for British authorities in particular, and anti-terror efforts in particular. The only thing that an attack like this is likely to accomplish is to encourage the next jihadi to pull of their attack, which will then inspire more revenge against British Muslims in what could easily become an escalating cycle of violence that will burden law enforcement, endanger innocent people, and lead to exactly the kind of chaos that ISIS and other terrorist groups are aiming to create. At the same time, though, this incident showed us something hopeful in the fact that the perpetrator of the attack was saved from possible revenge by the crowd he had targeted by the Imam of the mosque, who stepped in to make sure that nothing happened to him while they waited for authorities to arrive. That’s the kind of restraint that situations like these need, and it’s too be admired.

FILED UNDER: Law and the Courts, Policing, Religion, Terrorism, , , , , , , ,
Doug Mataconis
About Doug Mataconis
Doug Mataconis held a B.A. in Political Science from Rutgers University and J.D. from George Mason University School of Law. He joined the staff of OTB in May 2010 and contributed a staggering 16,483 posts before his retirement in January 2020. He passed far too young in July 2021.


  1. Just 'nutha ign'int cracker says:

    Cue up the “retaliation for retaliating” attack.

  2. michael reynolds says:

    The Imam stepped in and rescued the terrorist from immediate retaliation. Which rather flies in the face of Islam as the religion of hate, no?

  3. Paul L. says:

    Does the same standard apply?

    The actions of radical Islamophobes should not be used to condemn the peaceful Islamophobe majority

  4. Daryl's other brother Darryl says:

    @Paul L.:

    Does the same standard apply?

    I’ll let you know just as soon as I see your Dear Leaders Tweet condemning this.

  5. TM01 says:

    Too bad we’ll never really know what motivated this guy to do this.

    But I guess terror attacks are just part and parcel of living in a big city.

    I’m mostly fearful of an anti-white backlash tho. People need to remember that most white people are peaceful.

  6. HarvardLaw92 says:


    People need to remember that most white people are peaceful

    Sort of like they need to remember that most Muslims are peaceful too.

  7. HarvardLaw92 says:

    Hmm, the Daily Mail seems to have a problem with correct spelling.

    “Terrorist” isn’t spelled “white van driver”.

  8. TM01 says:
  9. Bob The Arqubusier says:

    This attack was completely despicable.

    It was also completely predictable.

    But it’s important that we put as much effort into blaming “islamophobes” for this attack as we put into not blaming Muslims for Muslim terrorism. Because reasons and shut up.

  10. MarkedMan says:

    Well, the guy was a Christian. Maybe we can put as much effort into not blaming all Christina as we do into not blaming all Muslims. Any objections?

  11. michael reynolds says:

    @Bob The Arqubusier:

    But it’s important that we put as much effort into blaming “islamophobes” for this attack as we put into not blaming Muslims for Muslim terrorism.

    What are you even talking about Janos? I dare you to parse that sentence and explain what you meant. Because I think it’s one of those deals that sounded like something profound in your head, but really doesn’t actually mean anything.

    See, you’re equating haters with an entire religion. You are saying that people who hate Muslims, and Muslims, are morally equal. That the entire 1.5 billion people are as bad as the worst of non-Muslims. Which inevitably leads to the conclusion that virtually all of “us” are better than all of “them.” Gosh what a surprising outcome!

    Try the sentence this way: But it’s important that we put as much effort into blaming the “KKK” for this lynching as we put into not blaming blacks for black crime.

    Or: But it’s important that we put as much effort into blaming “Nazis” for this genocide as we put into not blaming Jews for Jewish jewiness.

    Is that what you meant to say? Or will it be time for you to move the goalposts and throw scat around your cage as usual when you’re exposed as the nasty little bigot you are?