Robert Byrd and the Filibuster

Steven Taylor has been blogging up a storm on the media-appointed Conscience of the Senate, Robert Byrd, and his ever-shifting views on the inviolability of the filibuster. He chronicles the history of the filibuster, and notes the many changes to the practice over the years, including a significant one in 1975, when Byrd was Majority LeaderWhip*, which reduced the number of votes required to end debate from 67 to 60. Upon investigation, it turns out that Byrd actually authored this rule change. Finally, he Fisks a recent Byrd op-ed and explains why the “right to debate” argument is a canard.

Correction: Taylor notes that Byrd, who would later become Leader, was Whip in 1975.

FILED UNDER: Congress, Law and the Courts
James Joyner
About James Joyner
James Joyner is a Security Studies professor at Marine Corps University's Command and Staff College and a nonresident senior fellow at the Brent Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security at the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer and Desert Storm vet. He's a widower and father of two young daughters. He earned his PhD from The University of Alabama. Views expressed here are his own. Follow James on Twitter @DrJJoyner.

Comments

  1. Actually he was Majority Whip at the time, and became leader a few years later (1977, I think).




    0



    0
  2. john.ritchie says:

    Senator Byrd is one of the few courageous Senators who speak the truth, who will stand up for what he believes without equivocation, and is usually right. I hope to God he and a few others can some day bring reality, straignt talk, and truth to our Government.




    0



    0
  3. McGehee says:

    So, John.Ritchie, was he right when he was a recruiter for the Ku Klux Klan?




    0



    0
  4. Carlos says:

    Because he is a Democrat, Byrd will continue to get a pass on being the lousy weasel he is. He has more stripes than a zebra, and changes unshakeable positions more often than a chameleon changes color.

    If the MSM was one-tenth as honest as they believe themselves to be, Byrd would have been tarred and feathered by his colleagues long ago, but apparently none of them has the intestinal fortitude to take a real stand, either.

    Politics. Don’cha just love it?




    0



    0
  5. garry swaffar says:

    Without equivocation ? Robert”Ku Klux Kan” Byrd ??
    Are you talking about the same guy who changes his position faster than Bill Clinton changes the meaning of the word is?
    Bob ‘KKK’ byrd is not just a weasel, he is a detestably political weasel !




    0



    0