Welcome to September Forum

FILED UNDER: Open Forum
Steven L. Taylor
About Steven L. Taylor
Steven L. Taylor is a Professor of Political Science and a College of Arts and Sciences Dean. His main areas of expertise include parties, elections, and the institutional design of democracies. His most recent book is the co-authored A Different Democracy: American Government in a 31-Country Perspective. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of Texas and his BA from the University of California, Irvine. He has been blogging since 2003 (originally at the now defunct Poliblog). Follow Steven on Twitter

Comments

  1. OzarkHillbilly says:

    Consider my Fruede to be thoroughly schadened:

    As he attempts to meet mounting legal fees incurred in large part through his work for Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani will reportedly not get “a nickel” from one billionaire who backed his campaign for the 2008 Republican presidential nomination – or, apparently, much from many others previously big donors.

    “I wouldn’t give him a nickel,” the investor Leon Cooperman told CNBC. “I’m very negative on Donald Trump. It’s an American tragedy. [Rudy] was ‘America’s mayor’. He did a great job. And like everybody else who gets involved with Trump, it turns to shit.”

    Brian France, a former Nascar chief executive, was slightly more conciliatory. But he told the same outlet his wallet was staying shut: “I was a major supporter of Rudy in 2008 and at other times. I’m not sure what happen[ed] but I miss the old Rudy. I’m wishing him well.”

    Donald Trump happened to Rudy.

    1
  2. Jax says:
  3. Kylopod says:

    @OzarkHillbilly: I know we’ve discussed this ad nauseum, but in reading those recriminations (and this isn’t directed at you, just at those quoted in the article), I still feel the need to point out that Rudy was always an overrated racist jerk whose glowing reputation was based on fawning media coverage creating a myth around him that was never earned. Blaming Trump for his downfall lets him off the hook too easily. The effects of alcohol, age-related cognitive decline, and the desperation of a has-been trying to stay relevant, help explain why his bad tendencies that were always there became more visible to those who previously refused to see them.

    Donald Trump didn’t happen to Rudy. Rudy happened to Rudy.

    12
  4. Kylopod says:

    One other point I’d make about Rudy is that one of the things he shares with Trump was a capacity to latch onto something new in order to save a career in tail-spin. When Rudy became mayor, he was able to capitalize on the national hysteria over crime, and in that environment the racist undercurrent played well both nationally as well as in NYC. By the late ’90s, however, he became mired in scandal and his popularity dropped; it was why he never entered the 2000 Senate race against Hillary Clinton, where early on he was seen as an overwhelming favorite. The way he went on to use 9/11 to his advantage wasn’t how he built his lofty reputation, it was how he saved it.

    2
  5. OzarkHillbilly says:

    @Kylopod: I’ll disagree to a small extent. Rudy is as he has always been, but associating himself with trump is the thing that made obvious how small and hollow a man he is.

    3
  6. Kingdaddy says:

    In case you have anything left in the SCOTUS outrage tank, Clarence Thomas believes that filing deadlines and other legal niceties apply only to thee, not he.

    https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/08/clarence-thomas-ethics-worst-supreme-court-votes.html

    2
  7. OzarkHillbilly says:

    Today in news from Nebraska: US driver pulled over with huge African bull riding shotgun in car

    Converted vehicle stopped in Nebraska with gigantic-horned Watusi bovine called Howdy Doody as passenger

  8. Kathy says:

    @Kylopod:

    Donald Trump didn’t happen to Rudy. Rudy happened to Rudy.

    Don’t count out self-reinforcing relationships. Benito thrives by sacrificing others on the altar of his ego. Rudy accepted the invitation.

    2
  9. OzarkHillbilly says:

    Man who shot Black teenager Ralph Yarl must stand trial, Missouri judge rules

    Lester’s attorney, Steven Brett Salmon, suggested in earlier court filings that he planned to argue that Lester acted in self-defense, citing Missouri’s “stand your ground” law. Missouri is one of about 30 states with laws that say people can respond with physical force when they are threatened.

    Seeing as Lester was never threatened, I really don’t see how that is going to work.

  10. Kathy says:

    @OzarkHillbilly:

    Oh, his lawyers will claim he felt threatened, and that’s really all that counts.

    If this succeeds, next we’ll see some poor black person shot dead on the street from a distance, because some bigot felt threatened by their presence. Than it will be transwomen, gay men, immigrants, etc. And when a wingnut actually threatens someone with deadly force, and gets killed in legitimate self defense, the outrage from the MAGAs will be heard clear across the galaxy.

    9
  11. Sleeping Dog says:

    @OzarkHillbilly:

    Its worked in other states. Kind of like the cop defense, that they felt threatened, sometimes the court or jury buys it.

    1
  12. charontwo says:

    I assume this is about the same scandal I posted about a few days ago:

    https://twitter.com/DavidCornDC/status/1697614800581193965

    There’s a new Rudy Giuliani scandal. An FBI whistleblower says Giuliani, when he was digging for dirt on Biden for Trump, was co-opted by Russian intelligence. He claims his investigation of Giuliani’s activities was blocked by higher-ups. Check this out.

    MotherJones

    Link I posted earlier:

    Yastreblyansky

    Meanwhile, the superiors were starting to take an interest in Dynamo, in an inquiry on his (or her) identity that together with a recommendation from the Bureau’s newly formed Foreign Influence Task Force that Dynamo ought to be terminated as a source, because he’d associated with known Russian purveyors of disinformation; this struck the whistleblower as especially weird, since Dynamo had been so important in exposing Russian disinformation, which he could hardly have done without the association.

    Snip

    I think that pretty much brings it all together. The whistleblower and Dynamo were irresistibly drawn into a web of Trump-Russia intrigue featuring so many of the key players in the stories we tell, from Telizhenko (associate of Dmytro Firtash and Andrii Derkach in the efforts to save Firtash from criminal prosecution and to obtain hacked computer files to introduce into the Hunter Biden laptop at the FBI or the disk copy distributed by Giuliani and confederates to their favored Murdoch news media and eventually Catherine Herridge’s desk at CBS) to Deripaska (Paul Manafort’s boss in his Ukraine work and subsequently the conduit of confidential US election information to Russian intelligence through Manafort and Kilimnik).

    And an unremitting and ultimately successful effort to suppress their findings on these subjects organized in the FBI field office where the October Surprise of 2016 (the discovery of the Huma Abedin laptop and its possible classified information, of which there of course wasn’t any, but it did its intended damage on Election Day) was orchestrated to blindside Jim Comey and where Agent McGonigall sold services to Deripaska, for which he has now been convicted.

    And Giuliani always there at the center of the intrigue, with his propagandists (like Solomon) and thugs (poor Lev and Igor) and attorneys (like Toensing and DiGenova), and business associates (Rick Perry and the rest of the Amigos) in a way somehow even more louche than Trump himself.

    I leave it to the reader to build the contrast between this kind of whistleblower and the kind of phony produced on a weekly basis for the Republicans of the House of Representatives. To me it’s a lot more like the whistleblower testimony eventually traced to Alexander Vindman, a brave effort to expose some of the worst corruption in our history.

    And a sign to me that the exposure will, ultimately, succeed, even as Trump and Giuliani go on trial for some of their more recent crimes. The worst crime mob in Trump’s orbit was always the one working for Russian interests in Ukraine, in return for assistance to Trump (sometimes financial, sometimes political), and it too will have to go on trial one of these days. I thought we should all be totally out of our minds over it.

    3
  13. Kathy says:

    I just finished a book by Masha Gessen on how Russia reverted to totalitarianism. It’s a narrative history centered on a handful of people, two of whom are well known, and the overall developments that took place between the mid-80s to the mid 2010s. The title is The Future is History.

    I fund it very illuminating, and very depressing. Worse yet, there are some parallels to developments in the US, specifically targeting sexual and other minorities as the source of all problems.

    Fortunately there are differences as well. For one thing, Russia has a more homogeneous political culture, and has for ages (well before communism, too). This means widespread targeting and abuse of trans and non-binary people finds no purchase in more liberal areas of the country. Federalism helps, too, as making nationwide bans on things like abortion or gender affirming care is all but impossible.

    1
  14. charontwo says:

    From the David Corn/MJ piece linked above:

    It was big news when Rudy Giuliani, once hailed as America’s Mayor, was indicted last month by a district attorney in Atlanta for allegedly being part of a criminal enterprise led by Donald Trump that sought to overturn the 2020 election results. Giuliani was back in headlines this week when he lost a defamation suit filed against him by two Georgia election workers whom he had falsely accused of ballot stuffing. Giuliani’s apparent impoverishment, caused by his massive legal bills, and even his alleged drinking have been fodder for reporters. But another major Giuliani development has drawn less attention: An FBI whistleblower filed a statement asserting that Giuliani “may have been compromised” by Russian intelligence while working as a lawyer and adviser to Trump during the 2020 campaign.

    That contention is among a host of explosive assertions from Jonathan Buma, an FBI agent who also says that an investigation involving Giuliani’s activities was stymied within the bureau.

    Advertise with Mother Jones

    Mother Jones illustration; Theodore Parisienne/Getty; Wikimedia

    Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.
    It was big news when Rudy Giuliani, once hailed as America’s Mayor, was indicted last month by a district attorney in Atlanta for allegedly being part of a criminal enterprise led by Donald Trump that sought to overturn the 2020 election results. Giuliani was back in headlines this week when he lost a defamation suit filed against him by two Georgia election workers whom he had falsely accused of ballot stuffing. Giuliani’s apparent impoverishment, caused by his massive legal bills, and even his alleged drinking have been fodder for reporters. But another major Giuliani development has drawn less attention: An FBI whistleblower filed a statement asserting that Giuliani “may have been compromised” by Russian intelligence while working as a lawyer and adviser to Trump during the 2020 campaign.

    That contention is among a host of explosive assertions from Jonathan Buma, an FBI agent who also says that an investigation involving Giuliani’s activities was stymied within the bureau.

    MOTHER JONES TOP STORIES

    Advertise with Mother Jones
    In July, Buma sent the Senate Judiciary Committee a 22-page statement full of eye-popping allegations, and the document leaked in August and was first reported by Insider. According to Buma’s account, Giuliani was used as an asset by a Ukrainian oligarch tied to Russian intelligence and other Russian operatives for a disinformation operation that aimed to discredit Joe Biden and boost Trump in the 2020 presidential race. Moreover, Buma says he was the target of retaliation within the bureau for digging into this.

    The FBI did not respond to a request for comment on Buma’s claims.

    Buma’s revelations may only be the start. A source familiar with his work tells Mother Jones that other potential FBI whistleblowers who participated in the investigation involving Giuliani have consulted the same lawyer as Buma and might meet with congressional investigators in coming weeks. That attorney, Scott Horton, declined to comment.

  15. charontwo says:

    https://twitter.com/AWeissmann_/status/1697359668954153168

    Meadows perjury in the removal hearing can be both separately prosecuted and be additional proof against him in the 1/6 case. Note: it can be used for both ends by Jack Smith.

    1
  16. Kathy says:

    There’s this notion floating about that intelligent beings arising many billions of years from now won’t be able to deduce the Big Bang, as much of the evidence for it will have vanished or become to diffuse.

    This got me thinking whether in the future something along these lines might take place on Earth. Suppose a long, long, long, long, very long time from now, billions of years, humans are gone (for whatever reason), and eventually another species achieves intelligence. Would they be able to tell the age of the Earth?

    After all, we largely made use of uranium, due to its long half life, to determine the age of our planet. But what about in the future?

    Well, U-238, which makes up about 99.3% of all uranium, has a half life of around 4 billion years (that’s four thousand million years, so there’s no confusion). this means in 16 billion years there will be only 1/16 as much uranium 238 as there is now, along with decay products and the decay products of some of the decay products.

    So, maybe they could tell by then the Earth is about 20 billion years old.

    Should this world last so long. I can’t recall offhand the estimates of the Sun’s lifespan.

  17. charontwo says:

    https://twitter.com/BrendanKeefe/status/1697307180355965200

    Judge McAfee says there will be a live YouTube stream — operated by the court — of all Fulton County hearings & trials related to the Trump indictment, in addition to pool media coverage

    Judge McAfee says he’s following Judge McBurney’s practice that follows the spirit of open courts in Georgia. This came up when the court was asked to provide an overflow courtroom with a live feed. The current pool order expires Sept. 8 & will be refiled.

    1
  18. Jay L Gischer says:

    I just ran across this quote in a piece about Joan Didion, who was engaging with (reporting?) Central American politics, I think in the 70’s.

    I can’t help but be reminded of what a Salvadoran official told her [Joan Didion] during her on-the-ground research into Central American conflicts: “Don’t say this,” he said off-the-record, “but there are no issues here. There are only ambitions.”

    Wow, that sounds like a primary in the US. Maybe more the R primary, but I wouldn’t exclude a D primary without an incumbent.

    2
  19. Grumpy realist says:

    @Kylopod: Don’t know if you ever read Steve Gilliard over at The News Blog, but as a native New Yorker he gave some of the wittiest and trenchant analyses of Mr. 9-1-1 around.

  20. gVOR10 says:

    @Kathy: My similar worry is more short term. If we manage to destroy civilization any remnant that tries to rebuild will have no useable stocks of metal ores or fossil fuels. They’d have to rely on scrap metal to develop any technology. They’d have to rely on renewables for fuel.

  21. Kathy says:

    @gVOR10:

    It largely depends on when and how civilization collapses.

    If by massive nuclear war, for instance, then getting the richer sources of metals, concrete, and knowledge, among other things, will be deadly for several decades, if not much longer.

    If by supervolcano, mass coronal ejection, supernova irradiation, asteroid collision, deadly pathogen, then the outlook is better.

    As to fuel, there will be plenty of trees and too few humans. They make reasonable fuel. Some coal should still be available as remnants no longer profitable at strip mines.

    Stories of a civilizational collapse, though, are far more interesting than ones about rebuilding.

  22. CSK says:

    If I had even a smidgen of sympathy for Trump I’d feel sorry for him. As it is…

    http://www.axios.com/2023/09/01/trump-loyal-network-pen-pals-notes

  23. Gustopher says:

    @Kathy:

    As to fuel, there will be plenty of trees and too few humans. They make reasonable fuel.

    Humans make terrible fuel. I don’t think this Planet Of The Trees scenario is going to pan out, plus there’s a shortage.

    2
  24. OzarkHillbilly says:

    @Sleeping Dog: I know it has. I still don’t see how it can possibly work. If I was on the jury, it wouldn’t.

  25. Kathy says:

    @CSK:

    He comes across as a pervert who spends all his days masturbating his ego.

  26. Kathy says:

    @Gustopher:

    The trees would have to render and refine the humans first. They could develop means to extract a wealth of trace elements, too, like potassium, calcium, sodium, iron, etc. And what remains can be used as fertilizer. Zero waste.

    3
  27. CSK says:

    @Kathy:

    Oh, definitely. But what a job for his loyal aides, though. Imagine having to spend your days massaging the ego and catering to the insecurities of a physically and mentally decrepit badly aging oaf. I wonder if they roll their eyes and snicker behind his back.

  28. Kathy says:

    @CSK:

    what makes you assume his aides are not as pathological as he is?

  29. Just nutha ignint cracker says:

    @OzarkHillbilly: You know Missouri better than I do. Will a jury find in favor of: a wounded black kid or an old white man who was “standing his ground?”

  30. CSK says:

    @Kathy:

    Well, I could reply that that would be impossible on the grounds that no one’s more pathological than The Former Guy.

    I think a few of them are whacked as badly as he is. Liz Harrington, for one. Others probably stick with him because they can’t find employment elsewhere.

  31. Just nutha ignint cracker says:

    @gVOR10: I take a less dim (well, sort of) view in the event that we really destroy civilization–a daunting task, even for us. The first few hundred years of survivors will be so focused on merely living at all, that they won’t be thinking past bronze age or iron age technologies.

  32. Sleeping Dog says:

    @OzarkHillbilly:

    Old white man shoots young black man, of course the old white man was scared, wouldn’t you be? It’ll only take one on the jury that harbors that belief.

  33. Just nutha ignint cracker says:

    @OzarkHillbilly:

    If I was on the jury, it wouldn’t.

    Can we get 12 of you for the jury? (In a criminal trial it will only take one “not you,” remember.)

    ETA: And in a tort claim, Yarl will still need 7 or 8 of “you.”

    1
  34. Kathy says:

    @CSK:

    Well, I could reply that that would be impossible on the grounds that no one’s more pathological than The Former Guy.

    Of course. My mistake.

  35. Just nutha ignint cracker says:

    @Kathy: Carcasses already supply most of the provision for non-human parasites now. The abundance of riches following the end of civilization will be taxing for parasites at first, but they will rise to the occasion. Flora will follow.

  36. JohnSF says:

    @gVOR10:
    Actually, the scrap metal would make vastly superior (albeit distributed) resource of metals to a lot of ore bodies, IIRC.
    And at least in the UK there a still a lot of relatively easily accessible coal and peat deposits that have been shut down for environmental reasons or because they can’t compete with gas and imported open-cast coal.

    Anyway, give it a couple of tens of millions of years, and high CO2 hot-house conditions, and our intelligent rabbit successors will have plenty of new fossil fuels to play with.

    1
  37. OzarkHillbilly says:

    @Just nutha ignint cracker: Being as it’s KC, they just might favor the innocent black kid who knocked on the wrong door.

    1
  38. dazedandconfused says:

    @Kathy:

    I think some eggheads (anyone smarter than myself might do) should contemplate the conditioning presented by Old Testament doctrine. Particularly the aspect of that a God, above all, demands to be worshiped. Trump is presenting a demand to be worshiped in perhaps the way the Christian fundis have been conditioned to react positively towards, unapologetically.

    Just a thought…

    3
  39. OzarkHillbilly says:

    @Just nutha ignint cracker: He would never get a verdict of “innocent” out of any jury I was on. Bankrupting the gutless pos thru another trial and endless legal fees is something at least. I may not be able to vote 12 times but I can still cost him a bunch more money with a hung jury. I hope.

    @Sleeping Dog: of course the old white man was scared, wouldn’t you be?

    No, and I am an old, arthritic, bursitic, copd’d white man who lives in the country. I’m just not a f’n coward.

    True story: Not long ago I saw a car parked at the top of my driveway. Couldn’t tell much but that it was a private vehicle. I could hear a voice as someone was talking on their phone. This was right after this kid got shot and the women in NY was killed for stopping at the wrong driveway to turn around.

    I walked up my drive (WITHOUT A F’N GUN DAWG F’N DAMMIT!!!!) to see what was up and if I could direct them to where they were trying to go. Turned out it was a 30 yo black woman with an Amazon package for me who was absolutely terrified to drive down my drive and deliver the package and her dispatcher was telling her, “Don’t worry about it.”. Me? I could not blame her.

    I know STL. The first 40 yrs of my life were pretty much defined by those streets. A black woman from N STL or the near south side in Washington Co was as close to an alien world as one could get. Her fear was beyond my ability to assuage.

    I kept telling her, “Your safe here. Here, you are OK. Nobody is going to fuck with you in my drive. I’ve got you. You’re OK…..” And on and on and on. Tears are running down her face and the rage is rising up with in me. I wanted to give her a hug, but… Yeah, not then, not in that situation.

    I am still pissed off. The last time I had to deal with that level of fear in another person was 30 yrs ago and there were dead people lying in the street.

    This doesn’t have to be.

    1
  40. CSK says:

    @dazedandconfused:

    Now that is a very interesting idea.

  41. Just nutha ignint cracker says:

    @OzarkHillbilly: I bow to your wisdom on Missouri. As I said, I don’t know given that I don’t live there.

    @OzarkHillbilly: I’ve never seen a jury vote someone innocent that I can recall.

    ETA: The level of fear you were seeing in her is unacceptable; I will agree. Sadly, I have no control over that issue, either.

  42. Kathy says:

    @dazedandconfused:

    They already had a golden idol at a CPAC. Like good Christians faithfully obedient to the ten commandments should.