DoD Intel Transformation

NYT has an interesting overview of the effort to transform the DoD’s intelligence apparatus, by far the largest part of the Intelligence Community.

An Overseer Of Intelligence Efforts At The Defense Department [RSS]

Stephen Cambone may have more influence over intelligence matters at the Pentagon than anyone who has previously tried to oversee that enterprise, so his words carry some weight.

In bureaucratic rank alone, Mr. Cambone stands a full notch higher than any predecessor, as under secretary of defense for intelligence, a post created by Congress only last year. And he is widely understood to be Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld’s most trusted troubleshooter.

It is no surprise, then, that Mr. Cambone has irritated intelligence agencies and the uniformed military services, where officials have expressed guarded resentment at what they regard as interference. “He doesn’t have a lot of friends within that five-sided building,” said Representative Jane Harman of California, the top Democrat on the House intelligence committee, which has asked Mr. Cambone to appear at a closed session on Thursday.

***

His relations with the uniformed military in particular have been difficult, they said, while top officials at intelligence agencies under Pentagon control have grumbled about his heavy hand.

Still, Ms. Harman called Mr. Cambone’s task of integrating eight intelligence fiefs in the Pentagon one that would “inevitably involve breaking some china.” And a former Pentagon official said complaints were usually followed by compliance.

“If he asks you to do something, people assume that either the secretary of defense is aware of it, or that if they don’t do it, he will become aware of it,” said the official, who asked to remain unidentified to avoid jeopardizing his relationship with Pentagon officials.

Twice a week, military officials say, Mr. Cambone convenes a conference call that includes the three-star generals and an admiral who run the National Security Agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. In theory, each of those chiefs reports to Mr. Rumsfeld and George J. Tenet, the director of central intelligence; in practice, officials say, Mr. Cambone has made himself their most active overseer.

***

Current and former Pentagon officials describe Mr. Cambone as a pragmatist whose relationship with Mr. Feith has been cool. But they said that his stewardship of Mr. Rumsfeld’s transformation agenda created conflicts with the uniformed services. “There were questions as to whether people were working an agenda or looking at the world objectively,” a former senior Pentagon official said.

Mr. Cambone does not have any operational authority over intelligence agencies. But he has had a hand in budget issues and in setting intelligence-gathering priorities for the Pentagon agencies.

“Rumsfeld clearly trusts him to execute his will,” the former Pentagon official said of Mr. Cambone, “and I don’t think there’s a long list of people in that category.”

I have no basis for an opinion as to whether Cambone is doing the job well. Clearly, though, someone was needed to fill this role and anyone taking it on was going to have to fight natural bureaucratic tension to make it work.

FILED UNDER: Intelligence
James Joyner
About James Joyner
James Joyner is Professor and Department Head of Security Studies at Marine Corps University's Command and Staff College and a nonresident senior fellow at the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security at the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer and Desert Storm vet. Views expressed here are his own. Follow James on Twitter @DrJJoyner.

DoD Intel Transformation

DefenseLINK Committee Hears

DoD’s Plans for Intelligence Transformation DoD officials testified before the Senate Armed Services Strategic Subcommittee April 7 on plans to transform intelligence programs within the department.

Among those testifying was Stephen A. Cambone, undersecretary of defense for intelligence, who provided insight on how defense intelligence will evolve in the coming months and years, telling committee members of several initiatives by the department.

***

Cambone said the department is working to clean up internal processes. Officials are reviewing a list of committees, boards, working groups and other organizations within the department that have some responsibility for intelligence.

“At last count, that list is 14 pages long,” he said, “which tells you something about the need to clean up our internal processes to assure that we have more people who are capable of saying ‘yes’ to initiatives and being able to move more quickly, and fewer people who can say ‘no,’ which is essentially what 14 pages of boards, committees and working groups amount to.”

And, of course, the portion within DoD is a small part of the overall intel community. Integrating at the interagency level is going to be even more difficult.

FILED UNDER: Military Affairs
James Joyner
About James Joyner
James Joyner is Professor and Department Head of Security Studies at Marine Corps University's Command and Staff College and a nonresident senior fellow at the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security at the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer and Desert Storm vet. Views expressed here are his own. Follow James on Twitter @DrJJoyner.