Thursday’s Forum

OTB relies on its readers to support it. Please consider helping by becoming a monthly contributor through Patreon or making a one-time contribution via PayPal. Thanks for your consideration.

FILED UNDER: Open Forum
James Joyner
About James Joyner
James Joyner is Professor and Department Head of Security Studies at Marine Corps University's Command and Staff College. He's a former Army officer and Desert Storm veteran. Views expressed here are his own. Follow James on Twitter @DrJJoyner.

Comments

  1. wr says:

    On yesterday’s forum, there was a question about why the Netflix version of 3 Body Problem had moved from the China of the novel to (mostly) the western world. Kathy explained it thus:

    “What I read is the show runners wanted a more Western oriented cast and story(so woke!).”

    But, with all respect to Kathy, I think that’s really unfair to everyone involved. The fact is, there was no way that Netflix was going to spend $20 million per episode on a show that took place entirely in China, with a completely Chinese cast, logically all speaking Mandarin. This show needed to be a global hit, and it’s unlikely that a series perceived as entirely Chinese would make it. So it wasn’t “wokeness,” it was economics.

    That said, moving the events outside of China — while leaving in China the only events that actually had to happen there — does absolutely no damage to the story.

    If anyone finds themselves offended by the idea of internationalizing this story, you can always watch the all-Mandarin, shot in China version — all 30 hours are streaming on Peacock.

    But that one is actually less faithful to the book, since it eliminates all the scenes set in the Cultural Revolution… which provide the initial motivation for everything that happens in the story…

    ReplyReply
    8
  2. Kathy says:

    @wr:

    Pro tip: 9 times out of ten, when you see me use an exclamation point, I’m being sarcastic or ironic.

    Multiple exclamation points mixed with 1 is mockery.

    ReplyReply
    4
  3. OzarkHillbilly says:

    I couldn’t help myself and broke out in laughter at the absurdity:

    UN picks Saudi Arabia to lead women’s rights forum despite ‘abysmal’ record

    God has a wicked sense of humor.

    ReplyReply
    7
  4. Kingdaddy says:

    The grave mistakes of the original America First, and how the new one will re-create the global disorder of the 1930s:

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/03/28/robert-kagan-trump-ukraine-america-first-isolationism/

    Even if the United States faced no immediate threat of military attack, Roosevelt insisted, in his January 1940 State of the Union address, the world would be a “shabby and dangerous place to live in — yes, even for Americans to live in” if it were ruled “by force in the hands of a few.” To live as a lone island in such a world would be a nightmare. There were times Americans needed to defend not just their homeland, he told Congress in 1939, “but the tenets of faith and humanity on which their churches, their governments and their very civilization are founded. … To save one we must now make up our minds to save all.”

    ReplyReply
    10
  5. Bill Jempty says:

    @wr:

    But, with all respect to Kathy, I think that’s really unfair to everyone involved. The fact is, there was no way that Netflix was going to spend $20 million per episode on a show that took place entirely in China, with a completely Chinese cast, logically all speaking Mandarin. This show needed to be a global hit, and it’s unlikely that a series perceived as entirely Chinese would make it. So it wasn’t “wokeness,” it was economics.

    Author John Lecarre wrote what is termed the Karla trilogy in the mid to late 1970s.

    The three books were

    Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
    The Honorable Schoolboy
    Smiley’s People

    Two of them were made into BBC films starring Alec Guiness as George Smiley- TTSS and SP

    TTSS was also made into a 2012 film starring Gary Oldman

    Why was THS never made into a film?

    Most of the book was set in Hong Kong and Southeast Asia* just before and at the time the latter fell to the Communists in 1975. It would be a very expensive endeavor to film and that’s why the BBC took a pass on it. THS has a very complicated plot and an ending where the good guys (The Brits) both win and lose.

    Without anyone cheating, looking it up on the internet, what actor played Karla in Smiley’s People? It was a tiny role,

    *- There are significant parts of the book set in Cambodia, Laos, and Thailand

    ReplyReply
    5
  6. wr says:

    @Kathy: Sorry for misunderstanding your intent!

    And while we’re on the subject of expensive science fiction shows, have you seen Apple’s Constellation?

    I have yet to see the last episode, so I can’t tell if it’s going to hang together, but so far I’ve found it riveting…

    ReplyReply
  7. wr says:

    @Bill Jempty: I have long regretted the lack of an Alec Guiness-led Honourable Schoolboy. Money probably did play a big part in the decision, but also, as I recall, Smiley has a much smaller part in this book than in the other two, and for some reason a lot of people think it’s the weakest of the trilogy…

    ReplyReply
  8. Kathy says:

    @wr:

    I’ve paused my Apple subscription until season 2 of Severance comes out.

    It’s been decades since I felt I had to watch every Sci-Fi show out. Maybe because these days there are so many.

    ReplyReply
  9. Bill Jempty says:

    @wr:

    I have long regretted the lack of an Alec Guiness-led Honourable Schoolboy. Money probably did play a big part in the decision, but also, as I recall, Smiley has a much smaller part in this book than in the other two, and for some reason a lot of people think it’s the weakest of the trilogy…

    Smiley’s part in THS is smaller than in the other two Karla’s books. I think Le Carre once said the book could have been written without having Smiley in it.

    THS is the weakest of the three Karla book. Lecarre’s plot is overly dense even for him. Lecarre is also a little over the top with Westerby suddenly coming up with the grenade in the petrol bit.

    You know who would have been a perfect actress for Connie Sachs? Maggie Smith.

    ReplyReply
    1
  10. EddieInCA says:

    @wr:

    The fact is, there was no way that Netflix was going to spend $20 million per episode on a show …

    Netflix has put out the $20M number, but it’s not true. They’re embarrassed by the real number. I have a friend who was on the accounting team on that show. They actually spent close to $35M, per episode, which is INSANE. And it’s one of the reasons the great contraction is taking place. Apple+ just spent close to $400M on “Masters of the Air”, which breaks down to about $44M per episode. Again. INSANE.

    ReplyReply
    3
  11. Michael Reynolds says:

    @EddieInCA:
    I was disappointed by Masters of the Air, but not surprised. Structurally it was just impossible. It’s mission, mission, mission, ad infinitum. They looked for a way around that and veered off into a POW story line, that just felt odd. And the leads were not compelling.

    I think their best bet would have been to take it back to recruitment and training, establish the characters, then walk them forward. Same with the Tuskegee airmen, where the more compelling story is how they got into the war, less what they did when in combat.

    ReplyReply
    1
  12. Kathy says:

    @EddieInCA:

    You’d think for such amounts of money, they could have done the R&D for the golden helmets, and revolutionized the world in the process 😉

    ReplyReply
    2
  13. Monala says:

    I gave up my account on the app formerly known as Twitter following the Musk takeover, but I still see some of what’s happening there when users on Threads repost stuff. Apparently, quite a few right wingers are eating their own, much to the shock of those being eaten:

    —The conservative satirical site Babylon Bee made a joke about “inbred” white supremacists, and now is getting slammed by their readership.

    —Ben Shapiro of the Daily Wire fired Candace Owens due to anti-Semitic remarks she has made, and is likewise being slammed by his readership.

    —Anti-CRT guy Chris Rufo wrote a post decrying antisemitism in the conservative movement, and is now being attacked for it.

    Amazing how these folks can pander to racists and then be surprised when their followers turn out to also be anti-Semitic.

    ReplyReply
    4
  14. charontwo says:

    Here is something from one of my newsletters, read it all, fascinating:

    By seeking a trial delay in bad faith, Trump’s legal team burned valuable capital with Judge Merchan.

    JAY KUO

    MAR 26

    There were legal fireworks in a Manhattan courtroom yesterday as lawyers for Donald Trump sought to delay his trial for another 90 days.

    Trump’s first criminal trial was supposed to have started yesterday. But Judge Juan Merchan agreed to push back the start date to address a motion from the defense to dismiss the entire case or to give a big 90-day extension to the defense.

    The reason for the delay was this: Around March 1, District Attorney Alvin Bragg received tens of thousands of pages of documents from the federal government, specifically from prosecutors in the Southern District of New York. On March 4, his office began transmitting the documents to Trump’s legal team, which then cried foul and filed a motion to dismiss based on “prosecutorial misconduct,” or barring that, a 90-day continuance to give them time to review the documents.

    To buttress their argument, the defense claimed that under New York law, the state was obligated but had failed to obtain tens of thousands of documents from the federal government that were relevant to Trump’s defense.

    But it didn’t take long for Judge Merchan to take apart the defense’s ploy to cause delay for delay’s sake. Those watching and reporting from the courthouse uniformly observed that 1) Judge Merchan walked very seriously through the arguments by the defense, and then 2) gutted Trump’s lawyer, Todd Blanche, in front of the whole world.

    In today’s piece, and because I do enjoy watching liars and bad faith litigants destroyed and humiliated, I’ll recap some of the best moments from yesterday’s hearing. I’m relying on first hand accounts from the amazing team at Lawfare and other legal analysts in the courtroom including Norm Eisen and Katie Phang. I’ll then add a few words about why this is very much not how Trump’s team wants to be heading into trial in just over a couple of weeks.

    Judge Merchan took the allegations of prosecutorial misconduct very seriously. Upon hearing of the federal document trove, he took the trial date off calendar and even suggested that a trial would not be necessary if what the defense was claiming was true.

    “The motion,” Merchan noted, “accuses the People of engaging in serious discovery violations.”

    He noted the defense alleged that the prosecution engaged in “widespread misconduct as part of a desperate effort to improve their position” and “in improper and unethical actions.” The prosecution obtained some materials from the federal authorities, the defense alleged, but left other materials unobtained, hoping that the defendant would never get them. The defense claimed that “the People have been far more than passively complacent in the suppression of evidence,” a move that was “specifically geared to interfere in the 2024 Presidential Election.” The defense accused the state of engaging in a “strategy to hide the truth and to obstruct defendant’s efforts to obtain evidence.”

    Judge Merchan also cited a letter from defense counsel in which they wrote that it is “an affront to this Court and a violation of defendant’s rights for the People to attempt to make the Court complicit in their unethical strategy.”

    You would assume that no party would come to court and make such a serious motion without plenty of facts and law to back it up. And if you suggest that the Court itself has been made complicit in an illegal strategy, you had really better be prepared to prove it.

    Alas for Trump’s attorneys, they seem to have grown accustomed to making wild and baseless accusations for the sake of causing drama and delay. We’ve seen it in the election cases, in the civil tax fraud case, and now here in the falsifying business records criminal case.

    Judge Merchan came prepared to get at the truth.

    The defense should have known it would be rough going when Judge Merchan provided this rather startling reveal: While the trial had been adjourned since March 15, he had actually gone through the more than 100,000 pages of documents that the U.S. government had turned over.

    “Like all of you, I wish I had a little more time, but I did review them,” he said.

    Ruh-roh.

    He then wanted to hear from the parties directly about how many of these documents were actually relevant. The difference in responses was striking.

    Said the prosecution, “The number of relevant, usable new documents is quite small.” It was “in the neighborhood of 300 or fewer records.”

    ”We very much disagree,” said Blanche, his client shooting him a glance. Okay, then, the judge says, give me a number.

    “Thousands and thousands,” Blanche responded, and then began to reference bank records and FBI witness interviews related to the Mueller investigation. But Judge Merchan wasn’t interested in all that, saying the Mueller investigation has nothing to do with the case and is irrelevant. So Blanche pivoted and came back with “4,000 emails.” The judge asked what they are about, and then this happened:

    “We haven’t gone through them yet,” Blanche admitted.

    Record scratch moment. It is quite something to claim that documents are highly relevant to the case and warrant dismissal for prosecutorial misconduct when you haven’t even reviewed them yourself.

    Judge Merchan, of course, had taken the time to review them. Eyebrows raised and leaning forward, he pressed the point that Blanche had represented to the court that the documents were relevant to the case, and on those representations the judge had taken the trial date off calendar to address very serious allegations of discovery misconduct.

    And now defense counsel was in court saying he hadn’t even reviewed the emails?!

    Judge Merchant asked again, how many relevant documents. Blanche responded, “thousands” and Judge Merchan got annoyed. “Two thousand? Twenty thousand?” Blanche responded with “tens of thousands”—but the game was up. He didn’t really know.

    Contrast that with the state’s reply, which is worth noting in full. Here’s Lawfare’s summary of the representation by Matthew Colangelo of the DA’s office:

    ” … First, out of the 172 pages that comprise Cohen’s new witness statements, Colangelo asserts that all but one were not in the possession of the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Of the 91,327 pages of additional documents, Colangelo says that 56,261 consist entirely of records from Sterling Bank, and are therefore irrelevant. The ballpark continues to shrink. Another 35,000 pages relate to First Republic Bank, of which only two are unique and relevant. … ”

    Colangelo backed up his claim of “less than 300” with deadly precision. Judge Merchan walked through some instances where the defense claims relevant materials were withheld, but Colangelo was prepared and proved that these were all publicly available materials that the state had no obligation to turn over on its own. Blanche, his face matching his name, said nothing in response.

    The question of relevance already went about as badly as it possibly could for the defense. But the day got worse.

    Defense counsel had argued that the state had violated its obligations under New York Criminal Procedure Section 245.20, which generally requires that whatever entity the state is trying to obtain documents from actually be under the control of the state. The defense maintained that, by not obtaining the documents from the FBI and the office of the U.S. Attorney, the state had violated this section.

    The problem here was obvious. How is it that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s office are under the control of the state of New York, such that failure to obtain and provide documents from those entities becomes a violation?

    With some prodding, Blanche wound up admitting that he has no case that supports the proposition that the FBI or the U.S. Attorney’s office is under the control of the state for purposes of the discovery obligations under Section 245.20:

    ” …

    Judge: “Can you give me a single case—one case—that stands for the proposition that the U.S. Attorney’s Office is under the prosecution’s discretion or control?”

    Blanche: “I don’t have a case that says that exactly.”

    … ”

    Now the judge’s hackles were raised, as was his voice.

    ” …

    You’re literally accusing the Manhattan district attorney’s office and the people assigned to this case of engaging in prosecutorial misconduct and of trying to make me complicit in it and you don’t have a single cite to support that position.

    … ”

    Even Trump shifted in his seat, realizing his lawyer is a total loser.

    Judge Merchan drove one final nail in Blanche’s coffin. He pointed out that the state had made its first production of documents in the summer of 2023, and that therefore Blanche long knew or suspected that there were documents the defense had not received. And yet he sat on his motion and sprang it last minute.

    The exchange, reported by Lawfare, was remarkable, because it either showed Blanche was incompetent or that he was intentionally trying to delay the case.

    ” …

    Judge: You’re a former AUSA, right?

    Blanche: Yes.

    Judge: In that office? (referring to the SDNY)

    Blanche: Yes.

    Judge: How many years?

    Blanche: Four years as a paralegal, and nine as a prosecutor.

    Judge: So, you were there for 13 years. So you know that the defense … has the same ability as the prosecution to obtain these documents. So, when you received the people’s first production …you could have very easily done exactly what you did in January, but for whatever reason you waited until two months before trial.

    … ”

    As Phang noted, “Judge Merchan is visibly ANGRY.”

    Merchan zeroed in on this curious fact: Defense counsel had asked back in February for the trial to be delayed, but Blanche didn’t bring up the allegedly missing documents then, even though he was aware of them.

    “Why didn’t you bring any of this to my attention? Why didn’t you tell the court or anyone in the courtroom at that time that you had made this request, that it was taking a little longer than you expected?” Judge Merchan asked. “So how come you didn’t bring them up?”

    How come indeed.

    “Blache appears frazzled,” Phang reported.

    There is more, but I’ll stop here.

    I think this establishes, on the record, that Trump lawyers’ efforts to delay are frivolous and in bad faith, so I think more attempts at delay will be difficult to pull off, with this judge.

    ReplyReply
    12
  15. MarkedMan says:

    @Michael Reynolds: Haven’t seen it, but if they wanted to get right to the action, intermingling “present day” with flashbacks might have been a way to go.

    ReplyReply
    1
  16. Beth says:

    @wr:

    I had a part in that convo too. I understand changes will be/have to be made to the source material. I get there are artistic and economic reasons to do so. I don’t have a problem with that. Without going full Reynolds, I think the problem for me was, at least in the first two episodes it felt very very White Savior-y. Like, [booming announcer voice] “here are the White Heroes come to save the world! And here are some Asians doing math or being dirty!” Now I would watch Benedict Wong do just about anything. He’s amazing. He felt small and stifled. I could be WILDLY wrong with this whole take, but that’s what the vibes were for me.

    @EddieInCA:

    That is bonkers. Again, I contrast that with The Gentleman, which also wasn’t particularly good, but it was compelling enough to make me want to watch the whole season, maybe watch a second, and get bangs. Correct me if I’m wrong, but that didn’t strike me as super expensive to make.

    ReplyReply
    2
  17. MarkedMan says:

    @charontwo: Wow. Just… wow.

    ReplyReply
    2
  18. Kathy says:

    @Beth:

    Among the Brits trying to save the world, there’s a Chinese woman, a black man, three white men, a Chinese detective, and what may be a Spaniard woman played by a Mexican actor.

    So more like half-white savioury

    ReplyReply
  19. EddieInCA says:

    @Beth:

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but that didn’t strike me as super expensive to make.

    Guy Ritchie is one of those directors that understands he needs to stay within his budgets to stay working. It was made for a reasonable price. I liked the feature better, but the series worked for me, and am looking forward to season 2. It’s been great watching Theo James grow as an actor.

    ReplyReply
    3
  20. Beth says:

    @Kathy:

    Lol, my snarky response is: how do we expect the Brits to save the world, they can’t even save themselves*. Like, I’m willing to entertain some underlying unconscious bias or even racism on my part. I’m very much willing to accept that I might be wrong and am open to criticism on that point, except as to *. The vibes I got from the two episodes that I got were that the white guy from GoT was going to save the world, Benedict Wong was going to be grumpy, and the Chinese Lady was willing to kill everyone on the planet so long as the Communists got fucked too. And none of it was particularly compelling. And again, just for reference, I am a Star Wars fangirl. I am willing to accept SO MUCH BS, but this was off the charts BS, with a dull vanilla swirl.

    @charontwo:

    I once got accused of lying to a judge in open court. I didn’t, I misspoke and he jump to the most absurd conclusion. It was scary as hell. He was frothing at the mouth and the pro se defendants were egging him on. At one point he was demanding that I report myself to the Bar to get disbarred for lying. I was lucky that once I got some wits about me I remembered there was a court reporter there and was able to get her to read what was said and I was able to correct the understanding. The damage was done though. He went back to chambers to cool off and then had us come back there where he apologized to me. In the privacy of his chambers, not in the full courtroom where he called me a liar. It was awful.

    *I am white hot angry at my dad right now and the entirety of the English are gonna get the fallout.

    ReplyReply
    1
  21. Kathy says:

    @Beth:

    There are two Chinese ladies, Ye and Cheng. One is a victim of the cultural revolution, the other is not.

    I’m not enamored of the story thus far*, but 1) it’s watchable, 2) it has good production values, 3) Eiza Gonzalez is cute with that hairstyle, 4) Wade is an intellectual Bruce Wayne or Tony Stark, minus the money (though his unnamed agency seems to be able to draw on a very large budget), mixed with Robert Heinlein.

    And there’s Wong.

    *Too many magical elements in allegedly hard science fiction. Real hard science fiction ought to limit itself to one such element (usually a form of FTL travel).

    ReplyReply
  22. Kathy says:
  23. Stormy Dragon says:

    I remember a while back I saw the Jet Li movie “Hero”. Gorgeous film: well acted, fight choreography that seemed more like ballet than actual fighting, a brilliant use of color in the production design, an interestingly post-modern narrative where we’re seeing the same events played over through the eyes or imaginations of different people.

    It should have been one of my favorite movies of all time. Except it ended up horrifying me because it was using all this art to create fascist propaganda about why an authoritarian police state is actually a good thing that someone should eagerly sacrifice their lives to.

    I’ve been avoiding Three Body Problem for the same reason. I’ve read the summary and it’s clearly a sci-fi story about why you should want an authoritarian police state to wall you off from the rest of humanity for safety.

    ReplyReply
  24. Stormy Dragon says:

    Just to give MR an aneurysm, I was reading an article about why sci-fi readership is declining, and in a tangent it mentioned “Adult YA” as a competing genre that’s taken away some of its readers, and I found it hilarious that YA is a specific genre rather than a target audience, such that a book can be YA but not intended for readers that are YA.

    ReplyReply
    1
  25. MarkedMan says:

    @Stormy Dragon: “Hero” is one of the very few “rebellious” plots acceptable to the government. Director after director makes there version of the story with different actors and a different era of history.

    ReplyReply
  26. Bill Jempty says:

    @Stormy Dragon:

    I found it hilarious that YA is a specific genre rather than a target audience, such that a book can be YA but not intended for readers that are YA.

    Out of all fairness, books about space aliens aren’t intended for space aliens.

    ReplyReply
    2
  27. DrDaveT says:

    @Kingdaddy:

    There were times Americans needed to defend not just their homeland, [FDR] told Congress in 1939, “but the tenets of faith and humanity on which their churches, their governments and their very civilization are founded.

    The GOP apparently took this as an action item to remove those tenets from their churches, their government, and their civilization.

    ReplyReply
    4
  28. wr says:

    @EddieInCA: I thought it sounded low, but I just went by Google…

    As for Masters of the Air, Peter Biskind’s new book is full of astonishing dirt on its making. Apparently Apple decided their creative executive should be making all the decisions, not anyone with actual television experience, and he was so awful that not only did showrunner Graham Yost walk away, but so did Tom Hanks and his partner.

    ReplyReply
    1
  29. Kathy says:

    Bankman-Freid, however that’s pronounced, is going away for the next quarter century.

    He will appeal both the conviction and sentence. I don’t see why not. What’s he got to lose?

    ReplyReply
    1
  30. wr says:

    @Beth: “I could be WILDLY wrong with this whole take, but that’s what the vibes were for me.”

    I don’t think it’s a matter of being right or wrong. I happen to disagree with your take, but that doesn’t make my opinion any more of less valid than yours.

    ReplyReply
  31. Gustopher says:

    @Bill Jempty: I kind of wonder if adults are consuming YA stuff, desperate for the old people in our real world to die off already.

    The election has come down to a pair of octogenarians, let’s watch kids save the world, usually from old people.

    ReplyReply
    2
  32. wr says:

    @Stormy Dragon: “I’ve been avoiding Three Body Problem for the same reason. I’ve read the summary and it’s clearly a sci-fi story about why you should want an authoritarian police state to wall you off from the rest of humanity for safety.”

    Actually, the people who want the authoritarian police state are clearly the villains.

    ReplyReply
  33. Bill Jempty says:

    @Gustopher:

    The election has come down to a pair of octogenarians, let’s watch kids save the world, usually from old people.

    Like Wesley Crusher on TNG.

    ReplyReply
  34. DK says:

    Texas Trump voter: I’m leaving the Republican Party because of Trump, and, by the way, Hillary was right about everything.

    Then CNN brings him on, to explain further.

    ReplyReply
    3
  35. DrDaveT says:

    @Bill Jempty:

    Out of all fairness, books about space aliens aren’t intended for space aliens.

    Yes, but YA was always explicitly the target audience, not the subject matter. I can see that “books about teenagers written for adults” could be a genre — but you shouldn’t call that genre “adult YA”.

    ReplyReply
    1
  36. DK says:

    Panic in MAGAville. One of the village idiots, Charlie Kirk:

    “Tonight will be the largest fundraiser in political history – $25,000,000 in hard money raised in a single evening for Biden.

    This is more raised in one night than Trump raised the entire month of February.

    Democrats are beginning to fine tune their messaging, and they have a standing army of 5,000+ full-time organizers on the ground in the key states.

    We are outgunned and will be outspent. The polls are tightening.”

    It’s also more money than the RNC has raised total over the past several months. But no worries, Lara Trump is on top of it I’m sure.

    ReplyReply
    7
  37. Sleeping Dog says:

    @Kathy:

    He should become pen pals with Elizabeth Holmes.

    ReplyReply
    1
  38. Michael Reynolds says:

    @Beth:

    I once got accused of lying to a judge in open court. I didn’t, I misspoke and he jump to the most absurd conclusion. It was scary as hell.

    I was once accused of being, “the master criminal with the all-girl gang.” Scary in a flattering way. Some years later the guy was removed from the bench.

    ReplyReply
    1
  39. Michael Reynolds says:

    @Stormy Dragon:
    ‘Adult YA’ aka ‘New Adult’, has been a kind of back and forth, is it real or isn’t it, thing in the kidlit world. No one seems to know. To me ‘YA’ is a market I sell (mostly sold) into, the definition of same has never interested me. I don’t read YA, or kidlit generally, I just write for that market because, frankly, they paid better than adult. Also kid fans are less work than adults.

    ReplyReply
    2
  40. Michael Reynolds says:

    @DK:
    Also, Biden’s legal bills are way, way lower.

    ReplyReply
    3
  41. MarkedMan says:

    Sitting in the stands for opening day. Deep sigh.

    ReplyReply
    1
  42. Kathy says:

    @Sleeping Dog:

    He could also ask to have Lardass as his roommate. but that will take a long time.

    ReplyReply
  43. wr says:

    @DK: ““Tonight will be the largest fundraiser in political history – $25,000,000 in hard money raised in a single evening for Biden.”

    And Midtown is insane with security. My building’s back door is on 58th right above Sixth Avenue — Radio City is at 51 and Sixth. There are barricades along every streets, dump trucks everywhere, cops at every corner (and they’re not looking at their phones, as they do when they’re on subway duty). I’ve even got Secret Service outside my building!

    ReplyReply
    3
  44. just nutha says:

    @Gustopher: Good point!

    ReplyReply
  45. CSK says:
  46. Bill Jempty says:

    @Michael Reynolds:

    I don’t read YA, or kidlit generally, I just write for that market because, frankly, they paid better than adult.

    I write LGBTQ science fiction and the last time I read one of these tales is well over a decade ago.

    ReplyReply
  47. Mister Bluster says:

    Out of all fairness, books about space aliens aren’t intended for space aliens.

    Earthlings should be wary of the books that the aliens give them to read.

    ReplyReply
    2
  48. a country lawyer says:

    @wr: Years ago, I was in New York for depositions. When I was finished, I walked outside to see the streets all barricaded and New York’s finest everywhere. I went up to one to ask what was going on. Without turning around he said in his best New York accent “It’s that goddam Dan Quayle.”

    ReplyReply
    2
  49. just nutha says:

    @MarkedMan: Already? When’s opening pitch?

    ReplyReply
  50. CSK says:

    @DK:

    Kirk is the one who said this past Tuesday that if Trump loses in November, “the next day we fight.”

    I assume he’s speaking literally, not figuratively.

    ReplyReply
    3
  51. CSK says:

    @Mister Bluster:

    I KNEW you’d post that even before I checked.

    ReplyReply
  52. Bill Jempty says:

    If anyone cares, the answer to who played Karla in the BBC productions of John Lecarre George Smiley novels, it is Patrick Stewart.

    ReplyReply
    1
  53. just nutha says:

    @Bill Jempty: I cheated and looked it up. My source also said the “part” was 2 scenes (one in each movie) and no lines. This may well be the ultimate in obscure movie trivia.

    ReplyReply
    1
  54. Mister Bluster says:

    I’m waiting for Trump to market bottles of water from the Delaware River.

    You too can have the same waters that General Washington crossed on Christmas 248 years ago for $17.76!
    Don’t hold back! Take a shot at the next Red Cap you see!
    I’ll pardon you when I’m elected!

    ReplyReply
    2
  55. Gustopher says:

    @CSK: but we should take him seriously, not literally.

    ReplyReply
  56. CSK says:

    @Gustopher:

    How about seriously and literally?

    ReplyReply
  57. Mister Bluster says:

    @CSK:..my Twilight Zone

    It can only be coincidence that Rod Serling died in 1975 in the same hospital where I was born in 1948. Strong Memorial Hospital in Rochester, New York.
    And I can only credit to random chance that Rod Serling’s friend and eulogist, the Reverend John F. Hayward (WikiP) was the instructor of my Comparative Religions class when I was in college (1969) and was also the Unitarian Clergyman who officiated my wedding for $50 in 1995.

    ReplyReply
  58. CSK says:

    @Mister Bluster:

    Okay, cue The Twilight Zone theme…Doo-doo-doo-doo, doo-doo-doo-doo.

    ReplyReply
    1
  59. MarkedMan says:

    @just nutha: Sorry, just saw this. We are up 11-1 in the 8th

    ReplyReply
    1
  60. Beth says:

    @CSK:

    Lol, I can barely lift my arms above my head and I could beat Charlie Kirk’s ass in a fight. There are some really scary dudes on the Right. Hard core terrifying men. And they are lead by a clump of peed on toilet paper. Put Daddy Reynolds in one of those ratan chairs from the 70’s with a cigar and a dirty look and Kirk would piss his pants.

    Like, it amuses me to no end that men like Ben Shapiro and Charlie Kirk think that that if their Rightwing Utopia suddenly exists, they will be in control, or rich, or powerful, or whatever delusional shit goes through their brains. Guys like them, or women like Candace Owens or Auntie Caitlyn, really don’t get what happens. They rub the wrong person the wrong way one time and it’s a helicopter ride out into the ocean. How many Putin allies are radioactive popsicles?

    ReplyReply
    2
  61. Beth says:

    Holy crap, for grins I googled “1970s ratan chair” and came across this absolute unit going for the low price of $695. Marked down from $995.

    https://thronekingdom.com/products/peacock-70-rattan-wicker-style-1-chair-natural?variant=41706460774588&stkn=de38d674981a&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQjwqpSwBhClARIsADlZ_TkL-LVxOqxGGSSXGLwohRVcxq_FmxH3wEuWOs9asoMKzzcBWwJRGjkaAr-_EALw_wcB

    I want one so I can look like a high klass lunatic.

    ReplyReply
  62. CSK says:

    @Beth:

    “…I could beat Charlie Kirk’s ass in a fight.”

    He probably fears that, which is why he puts on a tough front.

    ReplyReply
    1
  63. CSK says:

    Judge Merchan and his daughter aren’t covered by the gag order, and Trump is taking full advantage of that fact:

    http://www.rawstory.com/trump-names-judges-daughter-loren/

    ReplyReply
    1
  64. MarkedMan says:

    You all, no doubt, will be glad to hear the Orioles won 11-3

    ReplyReply
    1
  65. Mister Bluster says:

    Go Orioles!
    I heard that there would be a moment of silence before first pitch for the victims of the Francis Scott Key bridge disaster.

    ReplyReply
  66. Just nutha ignint cracker says:

    @MarkedMan: Thanks! That answers my question. I had no idea that afternoon games were still a thing in baseball. Then again, it’s been almost 50 years since I went to a MLB game. It was the Seattle Pilots against some team I can’t remember. Luddite had gotten free tickets and we left early to avoid the post-game crush in the Pioneer Square bars.

    ReplyReply
  67. Mister Bluster says:

    Here come the Judge

    You’re literally accusing the Manhattan district attorney’s office and the people assigned to this case of engaging in prosecutorial misconduct and of trying to make me complicit in it and you don’t have a single cite to support that position.

    So Trump’s mouthpiece Blanche worked in the SDNY office for 14 years and is subject to this brutal censure from the bench.
    This leads me to wonder about the quality of Federal prosecutors throughout the Department of Justice.
    Is Blanche really this dumb?
    Did he really think he could get this past the judge without “a single cite to support that position”?

    ReplyReply
    2
  68. Mister Bluster says:

    @Just nutha ignint cracker:..I had no idea that afternoon games were still a thing in baseball.

    Wrigley Field in Chicago turned on the lights for night games in August of 1988. Before that all the Cubs home games were day games.
    This year the Cubs will play 42 day games at home.

    ReplyReply
  69. DK says:

    @CSK:

    I assume he’s speaking literally, not figuratively.

    What is Charlie Kirk, 150lbs dripping wet maybe? That pipsqueak ain’t gonna fight nobody. Let’s be for real.

    @Beth:

    Like, it amuses me to no end that men like Ben Shapiro and Charlie Kirk think that that if their Rightwing Utopia suddenly exists, they will be in control

    Lol But they cannot even control themselves. Like, who do they think they’re intimidating besides their beta male fanbase? Chile please. FOH

    ReplyReply
  70. CSK says:

    @DK:

    I think Kirk meant “fight with firearms,” not fists. And he won’t be on the front line, you may rest assured.

    ReplyReply
  71. DK says:

    @CSK: Ah. He’s one of the “liberals don’t own guns” people. FAFO.

    Anyway, there’s not gonna be any front lines if Trump loses. Just angry, impotent social media posts. Maybe a few sad, ragtag, middle-aged terrorists a la Jan 6. But you can’t really fill out a successful army with geriatrics, obese hicks, and meth addicts.

    ReplyReply
  72. Beth says:

    @DK:

    You forgot soft handed grifters.

    ReplyReply
  73. Kathy says:

    Just finished ep 8 of 3 Body Problem.

    Overall, meh.

    And there’s this: solving the three body problem.

    I may have spoiler comments later.

    On other things, as we left work early today, I attempted the pineapple coconut ice cream (sorbet?) again. It went better, but not entirely well.

    After about 15 minutes, it looked done. I let it run five minutes more just to make sure. Everything looked good. So I turned it off, managed to extract the paddle assembly, and at the bottom there was a puddle of slushy, not quite frozen mix of juice and coconut milk.

    Maybe sorbets do need sugar to properly set, which would defeat the purpose of sugar free frozen treats entirely. Or maybe it needs actual cow milk. The attempts using dairy, frozen yogurt and vanilla ice cream, both worked perfectly, no leftover slush anywhere.

    We’ll see.

    ReplyReply
  74. wr says:

    @Michael Reynolds: “I was once accused of being, “the master criminal with the all-girl gang.””

    Can we start calling you Dr. Goldfoot?

    ReplyReply
  75. anjin-san says:

    @Michael Reynolds:

    “the master criminal with the all-girl gang.”

    I’m kind of sorry I missed that phase…

    ReplyReply
  76. anjin-san says:

    Charlie Kirk

    Kirk once visited the UC Berkeley campus, basically looking for trouble. When it found him, he came off looking like, to use an expression that was popular when I was a teenager, a total puss.

    ReplyReply

Speak Your Mind

*