CALI SPAM BAN
NYT reports that California has banned spam:
Gov. Gray Davis of California signed a bill today that outlaws sending most commercial e-mail to or from the state that the recipient did not explicitly request. That is a far more wide-reaching law than any of the 35 other state laws meant to regulate spam or any of the proposed bills in Congress.
“We are saying that unsolicited e-mail cannot be sent and there are no loopholes,'” said Kevin Murray, the Democratic state senator from Los Angeles who sponsored the bill.
The law would fine spammers $1,000 for each unsolicited message sent up to $1 million for each campaign.
As the nation’s most populous state and the home to many large Internet companies, the California bill could well have a significant effect on spam. The bill puts the burden on the sender to determine if the recipient resides in California.
Very bold. I can’t see how this could possibly work from a technical standpoint, however.
James. It’s the thought that count. Consider this is Joseph Graham Davis Jr., the best politician money can buy, it means very little.
How is “social spam” affected? If I send a friend an invitation to an event–or for that matter, a lame joke, or a ill-thought-out political observation–is this now illegal?
Do they specify “stranger spam”? How about “date spam”?
Where does it end?
—