Double ‘No’ Plunges Europe Into Crisis
Despite being fully expected, yesterday’s decisive “No” vote in the Netherlands, combined with the weekend’s “No” by French voters have awakened EU leaders to the fact that their quest for unity is in jeopardy.
Double ‘no’ to treaty plunges Europe into crisis (Reuters)
The European Union faced a deepening crisis of confidence on Thursday after the Dutch joined the French in rejecting a new constitution in a move that could stall the bloc’s expansion and disrupt decision-making. EU leaders urged member states to press on with ratification of the treaty, drawn up to make the bloc run more smoothly after its enlargement to 25 states from 15 last year. The treaty must be ratified by all 25 to come into force. “The referendum result from the Netherlands was as expected, but it doesn’t change our position. We will push ahead with ratification,” said Czech Prime Minister Jiri Paroubek.
Latvia’s parliament overwhelmingly approved the treaty on Thursday, meaning 10 members representing almost half the EU’s 454 million citizens will have endorsed it. Still, the Dutch “No” vote of 61.6 percent in Wednesday’s referendum was even more decisive than the nearly 55 percent scored by French opponents of the treaty three days earlier. “The French slapped the left cheek of Europe, the Dutch have now slapped the right,” said Graham Watson, Liberal leader in the EU Parliament. “I hope this will bring the European Union out of its torpor and force its leaders … to show leadership.”
Many believe the rejection of the treaty by two of the six nations that founded the bloc in the 1950s was a kiss of death.
“Europe” is the name of a continent; it is not yet the name of a nation. The countries that make up the European continent, however–at least the Western part of it–have been getting along fine for centuries without a unifying constitution. So why the “crisis” now?
The votes cast doubt on the EU’s aspirations for a stronger foreign policy and its plans to expand further into the Balkans, Turkey and Ukraine, and raised questions about its appetite for economic reform amid mounting global competition. EU Enlargement Commissioner Olli Rehn said enlargement would proceed despite the French and Dutch votes, but letters would be sent to Bulgaria and Romania, expected to join in 2007, warning them the pace of their pre-entry reforms is insufficient.
Luxembourg Prime Minister Jean-Claude Juncker, whose country holds the EU presidency, said the Dutch and French rejections did not alter the economic fundamentals underpinning the euro. Nevertheless, the currency shared by 12 members of the EU touched an eight-month low after the vote in the Netherlands. The euro has lost nearly 10 percent against the dollar since mid-March but it rebounded on Thursday to trade at $1.2284 after falling to $1.2158 in New York late on Wednesday.
An economic adviser to Barroso told the Belgian financial daily De Tijd that the euro zone’s monetary union was in danger of falling apart if it was not backed by wider political integration, a key aim of the constitution. “Without political integration, the eurozone is a roofless house that becomes increasingly uncomfortable. Many inhabitants will want to leave the house sooner or later,” said Paul De Grauwe of Leuven University in Belgium. “The current situation is dangerous … The euro does not offer clear advantages to some countries and is considered there to be a source of economic slowdown,” he added.
The loss of such sovereignty was precisely the reason the proposed constitution was defeated. The people of France and the Netherlands are not yet prepared to cede power over basic issues to Luxembourg or the Czech Republic, let alone Latvia and Bulgaria.
I’d argue that the comity among the states comprising the western half of Europe is of recent vintage. Seems to me there was a great deal of unpleasantness among those states a mere sixty years or so ago…
Jem: Absolutely. By “getting along fine” I meant simply “doing nicely.” The dual meaning, though, is noted.