Inflation Changes Tax Brackets, Deductions, and Thresholds

The largest adjustment since the tax code was indexed in 1985.

WSJ (“Inflation Causes IRS to Raise Tax Brackets, Standard Deduction by 7%“):

The Internal Revenue Service adjusted key tax code parameters for 2023 to reflect higher inflation, raising the standard deduction and the income thresholds where tax rates take effect.

The 37% top marginal tax rate will apply to individual income above $578,125 and married couples’ income above $693,750 next year, as those thresholds go up 7% from 2022 under inflation adjustments announced by the agency on Tuesday.

The standard deduction will climb to $27,700 for married couples and $13,850 for individuals, both also up about 7% from this year, letting taxpayers shield more of their earnings from income taxes. The maximum contribution to a healthcare flexible spending account will climb to $3,050 from $2,850.

Because inflation is higher than at any time in the past four decades, tax code adjustments are unusually high as well. They occur annually under formulas set by Congress and largely match analysts’ projections.

This is the largest automatic adjustment to the standard deduction since core features of the tax system were first indexed to inflation in 1985. Congress has significantly expanded the deduction beyond those automatic changes, most recently in the 2017 tax law, when it was nearly doubled.

The changes will take effect for tax year 2023 and are generally designed to prevent inflation from causing tax increases. They will show up as lower tax withholding from paychecks as soon as January and thus create larger take-home pay early next year, all else equal. Taxpayers will use the larger brackets and standard deduction to file returns in early 2024.

The adjustments announced Tuesday include the income tax brackets and dozens of other parameters. The estate and lifetime gift tax exclusion will rise to $12.92 million from $12.06 million per person. The annual gift tax exclusion—the amount any person can give to any other without affecting lifetime limits—will climb to $17,000 from $16,000.

There are six tax brackets below the top 37% bracket, with thresholds for married couples that are all double what the individual taxpayer thresholds are. The rates apply to taxable income—which is income after deductions. For individuals in 2023, the 10% bracket goes up to $11,000, the 12% bracket goes up to $44,725, the 22% bracket goes up to $95,375, the 24% bracket goes up to $182,100, the 32% bracket goes up to $231,250, and the 35% bracket goes up to the top-bracket threshold.

None of this is should be surprising but I was still surprised because these changes are usually so subtle as to go unnoticed. Inflation is very high globally in the wake of the pandemic, supply chain issues, the war in Ukraine, and other factors. It makes sense that these things are indexed to account for the declining value of money.

Contrast that with property taxes which, at least in Virginia, work in the opposite way. Because our house and cars have appreciated in value due to the same pressures, we’re actually paying substantially more in taxes on them. Indeed, unlike any other state in which I’ve lived (and I’ve lived in quite a few) we have a bizarre system where we pay very high taxes on cars multiple times a year—a state property tax, a county property tax, and then yet again when we renew our registration.

FILED UNDER: Economics and Business, Taxes, , , , ,
James Joyner
About James Joyner
James Joyner is Professor and Department Head of Security Studies at Marine Corps University's Command and Staff College and a nonresident senior fellow at the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security at the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer and Desert Storm vet. Views expressed here are his own. Follow James on Twitter @DrJJoyner.

Comments

  1. Just nutha ignint cracker says:

    . Indeed, unlike any other state in which I’ve lived (and I’ve lived in quite a few) we have a bizarre system where we pay very high taxes on cars multiple times a year—a state property tax, a county property tax, and then yet again when we renew our registration.

    The Virginia branch of We teh Peepul needs to jump on this and sponsor a referendum outlawing taxes on chattel property. Washington state did this some years ago, and let me tell you, it was a dawgsend. Of course, funding for schools (IIRC) suffered for a few years as they had to get the missing money from somewhere (schools being the state equivalent of the middle class for federal taxes–that’s where the money is), but it’s a small price to pay for freedom from taxation. Especially for people whose children are grown and out of school.

    1
  2. Gustopher says:

    @Just nutha ignint cracker: As a man in his 50s oft- times working in a field with a lot of age discrimination (software), I’m wondering if we should have destroyed our schools a few years earlier.

    When I decide to go back to work, it might be nice to have fewer your whippersnappers trying to take my job.

    1
  3. Gustopher says:

    Why is this not being reported everywhere as “Biden Administration Cuts Taxes On Middle Class”?

    A family of four making one dollar less than the new highest tax bracket is really going to be getting some savings.

    Someone in the White House communications office deserves to be spanked if they’re not into it, and not spanked if they are.

    1
  4. James Joyner says:

    @Gustopher: I mean, I suppose they can try to spin it this way. But the recalculation is mandated by law and done by IRS career professionals, not the sitting administration. And the “savings” is nonexistent—they’re simply indexed to inflation.

  5. Just nutha ignint cracker says:

    @Gustopher: I was a teacher for 25 years and even I’ve wondered that. It does vary by state and region though. I’m not sure Metro Portland would suffer from having all its schools burn down whereas some places in Washington, including where I live now (but not where you live/I grew up) are pretty decent.

  6. Just nutha ignint cracker says:

    @James Joyner: An imaginary/on paper tax cut makes the argument for taking credit for it even stronger. Ask yourself WWTD–What Would [Former Guy] Do? Would MAGAts cheer over their “tax cut?”

    People keep saying that Democrats need to start doing stuff the same way the GQP does them. This is an easy change to make.