Read a Book, Get Oral Sex?

Read a Book, Get Oral Sex? (Reuters)

New York officials were red-faced on Friday after they discovered that clothing ads on city buses that appeared to promote reading suggested a love of books could be rewarded with oral sex. The advertisements that ran on about 200 buses across the city in recent months carried posters displaying a suggestively posed woman in hot pants kneeling among a pile of books beside the snappy slogan “Read Books, Get Brain.” What unhip, unsuspecting local transportation officials did not know was that “get brain” is street slang for oral sex.

The ads — from hip-hop clothing maker Akademiks, which intended the double-entendre — was stripped off New York buses on Friday after transportation officials discovered the street slang meaning. Metropolitan Transit Authority spokesman Tom Kelly condemned the “vulgar street phrases” in the racy ads he said were “demeaning women.” “To me and I believe to everyone else, while it was done by a clothing line, it would give the impression that it was also promoting reading and literacy,” Kelly told Reuters.

I must confess to being unhip as well; I’ve never heard this particular euphemism.

FILED UNDER: General
James Joyner
About James Joyner
James Joyner is Professor and Department Head of Security Studies at Marine Corps University's Command and Staff College and a nonresident senior fellow at the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security at the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer and Desert Storm vet. Views expressed here are his own. Follow James on Twitter @DrJJoyner.

Comments

  1. ITB Dingers
    Outside the Beltway and ads that were taken down in New York because they promised “getting brain” for reading. While James Joyner says he’s not “hip enough” to understand how this can be translated into getting oral sex for reading a book, the only co…

  2. Django Bliss says:

    I guess I don’t understand how this phrase is “demeaning women”. Oral sex is not something that is limited to a certain gender, it goes both ways. If it’s demeaning to women, then it should be for men as well. I just don’t see it.