Another Aspect Of The Trial Tax

Some of the other costs that come with exercising a constitutional right

The image is released free of copyrights under Creative Commons CC0 via pXhere

Since I started writing at OTB again, a topic I’ve touched on a few times is the “trial tax.” This is a term used in the criminal legal system reform space for the various penalties defendants face for exercising their Constitutional right to a trial versus accepting a plea bargain. The most common example is being convicted of a more severe crime and facing significantly more jail time than if they had pled guilty. Last week, in his post about the first January 6th defendant to be acquitted, James highlighted a different aspect of the trial tax that I haven’t touched on:

While the 6th Amendment guarantees the right to a speedy trial, inadequate infrastructure means that they seldom occur. We’re fifteen months out from the riot and only three of 800 people have seen their cases go to trial—plus another 200 or so who pled guilty in exchange for getting the damn thing over with. That’s roughly 600 people who have had their lives on hold, lost jobs, and face untold legal bills over what, in almost all cases, are misdemeanor offenses. That’s a hell of a “tax.”

James is completely correct about this aspect. While the Consitution guarantees a “speedy trial” there is no actual definition of what that means. The only part of the criminal legal process that has a set time window is how long you can be held before appearing before a judge. In County of Riverside v. McLaughlin (1991), the Supreme Court determined that you must be charged within 48 hours of arrest. Prior to that decision, there was no national standard. Some States had set time limits, others did not.*

Once you have passed that initial appearance, generally speaking, there are few, rules defining what a speedy trial will be. The reality is that trials, even under the best of circumstances, take a long time for a number of reasons. Building a case or defense requires a lot of work. There are often motions from both sides that can delay hearings. There are logistical issues around scheduling trials (which includes waiting for other trials to complete). And then there are unexpected externalities. For example, COVID-19 ground the courts to a halt while they attempted to shift their (often antiquated procedures) to meet the realities of the pandemic. Or in the case of the January 6th defendants, the sheer number of cases has overwhelmed the DC Federal District Courts which are simply not staffed for this many trials. As a result, cases, especially felony trials, drag out.

Often states do set policies about how long the “average” case should take. So for example, Florida stipulates that felonies that go to trial should be resolved within 180 days (90 days for misdemeanors). That’s in keeping with the guidelines that the National Center of State Courts has published. Unfortunately, because of the opaqueness of criminal legal system data in the US, it’s difficult to quantify how long things actually take. Depending on the structure of a state’s courts and how they collect and publicize their data, the number may or may not be able to be calculated. Even though Flordia has some of the best transparency laws in the country, it’s still exceedingly hard to separate plea bargains from jury verdicts**. My former employer, Measures For Justice, has done important work in the area of data transparency. And while they were not able to disambiguate pleas from trials, they were at least able to show that the average time to resolution for a felony in Florida is 108 days***. As you see below that does vary from county to county for that data set.

Measures for Justice chart showing average time to disposition for Felonies by Florida county

Setting aside the question of trials for the moment, let that amount of time set in. If you are charged with a felony in Florida, on average it takes 108 days to reach a final outcome (be that conviction or dismissal/acquittal). That’s three and a half months.

If you are held for that time, you have lost your job or, if you are self-employed, you lost a quarter of your income for a year. If you are a single parent, your kids may have been moved into the foster care system if there is no one to take them in. Even if you are acquitted, your life is turned upside down. And that’s before we get to everything bad that can happen to you in jail.

Things are also not easy if you are not held. Assuming there is no bail or the bail amount is not set at a punitive level (more on that to come in another post), things are still difficult. Let’s accept for the moment that the pre-release hearing takes place quickly enough that you maintain your job and there is no major family disruption (neither of those is guaranteed). If a provision of your release is electronic monitoring, it means that, even though you have not been convicted, you will be literally paying for your freedom at a cost of somewhere usually between $75 and $100 a week (as that monitoring equipment is “rented” from the county). So you can work, but part of your paycheck is going to that. And your freedom is severely curtailed and any violation can send you back to jail. That’s all before we get to any legal and other costs related to the trial, like the time off work you’ll have to take, travel costs, child care costs, etc. This all adds up incredibly quickly.

Whether you are held or released pretrial, there are still significant costs associated with that period. This part of the trial tax, combined with the specter of a long sentence if convicted at trial, often leads people to take a plea deal to lesser charges so they can “get on with their lives” (a phrase that comes up a lot with justice-involved folks). I’m not naive enough to believe that everyone who is charged with a crime is necessarily innocent (or even the majority of them). However, the trial tax definitely means that people who otherwise might be acquitted of a charge end up pleading guilty (see James’ example). And that should concern all of us.


* – Note that to this day, there are still different time limits depending on which state you are in. The 48 hours established by the Supreme Court remains the longest someone can be held. There are some states where you must appear before a judge within 24 or 36 hours.

** – One reason that it’s difficult to separate plea bargains from jury verdicts is that many court Case Management Systems do not capture how a disposition was reached. Without that variable, there is no easy way to filter the data.

*** – Sadly, in many states, we cannot even calculate this number due to the fragmented and antiquated ways court data are stored.

FILED UNDER: General
Matt Bernius
About Matt Bernius
Matt Bernius is a design researcher working to create more equitable government systems and experiences. He's currently a Principal User Researcher on Code for America's "GetCalFresh" program, helping people apply for SNAP food benefits in California. Prior to joining CfA, he worked at Measures for Justice and at Effective, a UX agency. Matt has an MA from the University of Chicago.

Comments

  1. Flat Earth Luddite says:

    Thanks, Matt. I’ll probably ping in later after coffee, but thanks to you and your cohort for everything you’re doing on this.

    3
  2. Michael Reynolds says:

    @Flat Earth Luddite:
    Agree.

    Doing the lord’s work, Matt.

  3. Matt Bernius says:

    Thanks @Flat Earth Luddite & @Michael Reynolds!

    In full transparency, I’m not doing as much in the criminal legal system space right now. I’ve recently rotated to working on food benefits and the social safety net in California and beyond. That said, Code for America is continuing its work on automatic record clearance (and I hope to get back to that team at some point) and my former colleagues at Measures for Justice is chugging along on making criminal legal data more transparent.

    That said, this is one of those topics that I remain really passionate about (and feel like I can help do education on). So expect to hear more from me when I have chances to write and there’s something to write about (sadly TX just delivered a prime example of both overcharging and punative bail… I will be covering that case in the next day or two).

    2
  4. Mu Yixiao says:

    Part of this comes from the American obsession of turning everything into a crime. There are so many laws that could (and should) be repealed, giving the courts’ time back to dealing with the stuff that matters.

    1
  5. Kathy says:

    The monitor thing is all screwed up. If you’re imprisoned, you’re not charged for room and board at the prison or jail. Likewise, the expense of monitoring someone out awaiting trial should be borne by the state or the federal government.

  6. Mister Bluster says:

    @Kathy:..If you’re imprisoned, you’re not charged for room and board at the prison or jail.

    That depends on where you are locked up.

    Michigan inmates can be billed up to $60 a day for time in a county jail. Some defend the practice as a way to reimburse taxpayers, but advocates say the pay-to-stay fees heap on extra punishment.
    The vast majority of states allow people to be charged for time behind bars

    2
  7. Matt Bernius says:

    @Kathy:

    The monitor thing is all screwed up. If you’re imprisoned, you’re not charged for room and board at the prison or jail.

    Monitoring is a huge issue, especially how it’s sold to counties.

    However, I need to correct your comment about room and board. Depending on the state you are in, you can be charged room and board while being incarcerated.
    https://www.npr.org/2022/03/04/1084452251/the-vast-majority-of-states-allow-people-to-be-charged-for-time-behind-bars

    At some point, I will tackle fines+fees and the role they play in votor disenfranchisement (not to mention the ongoing criminalization of poverty).

    [Edit: Great minds clearly think alike Mr. Bluster.]

    2
  8. Mister Bluster says:
  9. Mister Bluster says:

    @Matt Bernius:..Great minds
    I am humbled by your kind words.
    NPR is my go to source for many subjects. It’s nice to know that they have at least two listeners.

    1
  10. Kathy says:

    @Mister Bluster:
    @Matt Bernius:

    That is absolutely appalling.

    1
  11. Flat Earth Luddite says:

    @Matt Bernius:
    @Mister Bluster:

    (sadly TX just delivered a prime example of both overcharging and punitive bail… I will be covering that case in the next day or two).

    Of course Texas demonstrates overcharging and punitive punishments… but only against those who are not wealthy.

    AFAICT, it is a standard feature throughout ‘Merika that, if you aren’t in the upper echelon, punishment must be unfair, burdensome, and designed to keep uppity types in their places. How else do we enforce the higher status of the powers that be?

    3
  12. Just nutha ignint cracker says:

    @Mister Bluster:

    “What I don’t agree with is people saying that’s not enough [punishment],” Pelayo said. “What’s the concept of punishment? Is it the time, or getting beat up every other day in jail?”

    This is the problematical element all right. For some people, the time all by itself isn’t enough. Calvinist and similar theologies seem to gravitate toward the idea that suffering is also a part. Paying for a safer confinement with lower suffering is, therefore, wrong. Oops.

    (And based on what he pled to, if he only getting beat up every other day, he’s ahead on the averages. 🙁 )

  13. Just nutha ignint cracker says:

    @Flat Earth Luddite: “AFAICT, it is a standard feature throughout ‘Merika that, if you aren’t in the upper echelon, punishment must be unfair, burdensome, and designed to keep uppity types in their places. How else do we enforce the higher status of the powers that be?”

    Well, this too, of course. And again, suffering is an integral part of the package.

  14. OzarkHillbilly says:

    @Kathy: That is absolutely appalling.

    That may well be, but what it is, is absolutely (US) American.

  15. Mimai says:

    I appreciate your principled stance on these matters, not to mention your actual behaviors.

    1
  16. Chip Daniels says:

    The trial tax also needs to be understood in how it destroys the credibility of crime statistics.

    When people throw around statistics showing how many crimes were committed by which people, the raw data of crimes is warped by the fact that a person guilty of felony battery gets plead down to misdemeanor assault, but a factually innocent person pleads guilty to misdemeanor assault to avoid the tax.

    Two people, a common sentence, yet the actual truth of who is committing what crimes is forever obscured.
    Not just WHO, but WHAT.
    The record will forever show that two misdemeanor assaults took place, but in fact there was a felony and a non-crime.

    5
  17. Mimai says:

    @Chip Daniels: This is an excellent point. Of particular relevance to the nature/scope of drug-related charges and convictions. Our motivated reasoning apparatus (ie, brain) does us few favors here…ala, Can I / Must I believe this?

    1
  18. Richard Gardner says:

    I know the County Superior Courts (Felonies) in my area (WA) ave been crawling along for years and Covid delays have made is worse. Huge backlog despite a large reduction in arrests.
    One case I followed was a major drug bust near me on April 15, 2019, dealing out of a motel that a relative owned. Continued, continues, continued. Then COVID. Finally went to court Sep 17, 2021, over 2 years later. Guilty, but one disappeared and has a warrant. And they were assessed $500 each in court fees.
    Another case is ongoing. A young man with mental issues was threatening neighbors and was arrested a few days later (after investigation) on Aug 12, 2021. He sat in jail for over a month, partially due to waiting for an ankle bracelet as the emptying out of the jails due to Covid had put them in short supply. His trial is currently scheduled in May but I’m sure it will get continued until the Fall. His folks are well off so he does have a paid attorney so it might go faster.

  19. de stijl says:

    @Flat Earth Luddite:

    If you are not clued into Radley Balko, check him out.

    1
  20. Matt Bernius says:

    @de stijl:
    100% this. Radley’s work is amazing and I totally geeked out the day he decided to follow me on twitter!