Boebert’s District Switch

Lines on the map for the win.

Via the NYT: Lauren Boebert, Far-Right Firebrand, Is Switching House Districts in Colorado.

Colorado’s Fourth Congressional District is significantly more conservative than the Third, and securing the Republican nomination would place Ms. Boebert in a strong position to win in a seat where Mr. Buck earned 60 percent of the vote in 2022. Ms. Boebert barely won re-election that year, pulling ahead of her Democratic opponent, Adam Frisch, with roughly 500 votes.

[…]

An earlier analysis by the Cook Political Report had rated the race for Ms. Boebert’s current seat in 2024 as a tossup. By contrast, the race in the general election in the Fourth Congressional District is not considered competitive.

This is just another data point in my ongoing discussion of the value of lines on the map in our “representative” system. Politicians can, in many ways, including in this situation, seek to choose their voters, rather than the other way around. Boebert is here responding to the incentives that our system creates. Instead of having to adapt to the competitive pressures of her own district, she is going to try and leverage the primary system to her advantage.

This is a microcosm of the dynamic I like to note: the porousness of the primaries makes it an entry point into elected office far more than the elections themselves. Boebert sees that the best way to return to the House is to win a primary in a non-competitive district.

The interesting question is to what degree can she parlay her MAGA celebrity status into a win in the primary?

A primary challenger has since emerged with significant backers among prominent former Republican officials in the state. Jeff Hurd, a 44-year-old lawyer from Grand Junction, has been endorsed by former Gov. Bill Owens and former Senator Hank Brown. The editorial board of the Colorado Springs Gazette also endorsed Mr. Hurd over Ms. Boebert this month.

As such, this is also could be an interesting example of my point about primaries and the establishment within the party versus the ability of a non-preferred (by said establishment) candidate to win the nomination (i.e., an illustration of the weakness of US parties). Hurd would appear to be the CO GOP’s preferred candidate, but Boebert could end up using the primary process to usurp the nomination, and the seat since the winner of the primary is almost certainly going to win the seat.

Note that Boebert only needs to win the plurality of the primary vote to win the nomination. There are multiple candidates running.

The other Republicans running in the primary to replace Mr. Buck include two former state senators, Ted Harvey and Jerry Sonnenberg; Richard Holtorf, a state representative; Trent Leisy, a Navy veteran and business owner; and Deborah Flora, a radio host.

FILED UNDER: 2024 Election, Democratic Theory, US Politics, ,
Steven L. Taylor
About Steven L. Taylor
Steven L. Taylor is a Professor of Political Science and a College of Arts and Sciences Dean. His main areas of expertise include parties, elections, and the institutional design of democracies. His most recent book is the co-authored A Different Democracy: American Government in a 31-Country Perspective. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of Texas and his BA from the University of California, Irvine. He has been blogging since 2003 (originally at the now defunct Poliblog). Follow Steven on Twitter

Comments

  1. Jay L Gischer says:

    That primary doesn’t look like a shoo-in for her, but I’m guessing her current district looks even worse.

    Here’s a dumb question: Does the State of Colorado allow her to run in a primary in more than one district? I wouldn’t think so, but still…

    ReplyReply
  2. EddieInCA says:

    @Jay L Gischer:

    She can’t run in both.

    But, also, she doesn’t have to live in the district to represent it. Which I think sucks. You should have to live in the district to represent it. But that’s just me.

    ReplyReply
    11
  3. Mr. Prosser says:

    I think she’ll get her rear handed to her in the District 4 primary. That’s mostly sparsely populated rural great plains farming country, more closely aligned politically with Kansas and Nebraska and Oklahoma, a different world from the area she is running away from. I doubt the voters over there will take kindly to an obviously ambitious interloper.

    ReplyReply
    2
  4. Just nutha ignint cracker says:

    @EddieInCA: Didn’t the practice of not needing to live in the district you represent start when some legislative redistricting committee somewhere discovered that by moving a boundary line a few hundred feet they could move the incumbent Congresscritter out of his district and into one his party already held?

    Once again, “we have met the enemy, yada, yada, yada…”

    ReplyReply
  5. Michael Cain says:

    @EddieInCA:

    You should have to live in the district to represent it. But that’s just me.

    And the redistricting commission went to all the work to run an odd projection out in order to include Ken Buck’s house inside the new district borders. Despite representing the rural eastern plains, Buck lives in the Front Range urban corridor.

    ReplyReply
    1
  6. CSK says:

    If she loses, she can always resume her twin avocations of vaping and masturbating her dates in theaters.

    ReplyReply
    2
  7. al Ameda says:

    The interesting question is to what degree can she parlay her MAGA celebrity status into a win in the primary?

    A primary challenger has since emerged with significant backers among prominent former Republican officials in the state. Jeff Hurd, a 44-year-old lawyer from Grand Junction, has been endorsed by former Gov. Bill Owens and former Senator Hank Brown. The editorial board of the Colorado Springs Gazette also endorsed Mr. Hurd over Ms. Boebert this month.

    I’d like to take this opportunity to thank the voters of her ‘old’ district for sending her to Congress so that they could keep her out of their movie theaters.

    Now, to get back on point and answer the question: yes, she could very well parlay her MAGA celebrity idiocy into a primary win.

    ReplyReply
    2
  8. Just nutha ignint cracker says:

    @Michael Cain: Redistricting lines go toward 2 different end results? Good to know!

    ReplyReply
    1

Speak Your Mind

*