Bush Expected to Declare Victory Today

Bush Expected to Declare Victory Today (WaPo)

President Bush scheduled a victory announcement in Washington today, with officials of his reelection campaign asserting that he has won at least 286 electoral votes — 16 more than he needs — and that they do not have to wait for John F. Kerry to concede. The White House has not yet announced what time Bush will appear. The campaign at first summoned reporters to appear at the Ronald Reagan Building between 9 a.m. and 10 a.m. but then put off the event. A White House official said Bush’s aides anticipate Kerry will concede today. But the official said that if Kerry did not give in, that would not stop them from claiming victory. “If it’s like this, the people have spoken and you’ve won it, and that doesn’t depend on your opponent conceding,” the official said.

Bush had been on the brink of traveling to the Reagan Building early this morning to deliver a victory statement at a Republican National Committee celebration after two networks declared he had won Ohio. But White House officials delayed those plans in confusion and annoyance after Kerry’s camp told reporters he would not concede. The president, who is typically in bed by 10, stayed up until 5 a.m., huddling with White House senior adviser Karl Rove and other members of his staff to try to determine when he could make a solid case that he had won 270 electoral votes — the finish line in the presidential election.

Rove and White House communications director Dan Bartlett angrily pushed television networks to declare Bush the winner. Some networks had called Ohio for him and others said he had won Nevada. The combination of the two put him over 270, but no network had declared Bush the winner. So at 5:39 a.m., with only about 100 people left at the Republican celebration, White House chief of staff Andrew H. Card Jr. went to the rostrum to declare that Bush “has won the state of Ohio” and that his “margin is statistically insurmountable, even after the provisional ballots are considered.” Card said Bush “has also been declared the winner in Nevada.” He said that “adds up to a convincing Electoral College victory” but that the president “has decided to give Senator Kerry the respect of more time to reflect on the results of this election.” “We are convinced that President Bush has won reelection with at least 286 Electoral College votes, and he also had a margin of more than 3.5 million popular votes,” Card said.
“President Bush’s decisive margin of victory makes this the first presidential election since 1988 in which the winner received a majority of the popular vote. And in this election, President Bush received more votes than any presidential candidate in our country’s history,” he said.

The official said the White House feels the networks were reluctant to declare Bush the winner because they were nervous after the experience of 2000 and were giving in because “Democrats and Senator Kerry’s campaign are raising questions about Ohio.”

Yep. I hope Kerry concedes, for his own sake and the good of the country. But, if he refuses to do the honorable thing, Bush needs to claim victory rather than give credence to the idea that the election isn’t over.

FILED UNDER: 2004 Election, Media, , , , , , , , , ,
James Joyner
About James Joyner
James Joyner is Professor and Department Head of Security Studies at Marine Corps University's Command and Staff College. He's a former Army officer and Desert Storm veteran. Views expressed here are his own. Follow James on Twitter @DrJJoyner.

Comments

  1. ken says:

    Sorry James, to concede without counting all the ballots would be a consession to the bad guys. I see the only way to maintain honor is to allow all the ballots to be counted.

    Kerry and millions of Americans fought too hard for every single vote to deny the importance of counting every single vote now.

  2. Steve says:

    I agree with Ken that counting all the ballots is the correct (not to mention, respectful to the voters) thing to do. However, since the remaining ballots cannot, except in the most outlandish scenario, change the outcome of the election, the honorable response would be to concede the election. The count could continue to arrive at a final/official total, but the country could more quickly begin moving forward.

    Mid-rant update: It looks like Sen. Kerry did the right thing.

  3. McGehee says:

    to concede without counting all the ballots would be a consession to the bad guys

    Dang, and I left my black hat and brass knuckles at home.