David Rivera, Freshman Congressman, Faces Ethics Charges

Rivera faces allegations that he failed to disclose loans from a company owned by his mother. | AP Photo

Rivera faces allegations that he failed to disclose loans from a company owned by his mother. | AP Photo

A Politico story begins,

Just three weeks into his congressional career, Rep. David Rivera (R-Fla.) has earned the dubious distinction of being the first member of the historic class of House GOP freshmen to find himself at the center of an ethics scandal.

The Rivera case also could prove an early and politically sensitive problem for Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Virginia and other top Republicans who criticized former Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s handling of scandals involving Reps. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) and Maxine Waters (D-Calif.).

Well, that’s pretty impressive.  What rules of the House did Rivera manage to violate so quickly?

The 45-year-old Rivera, who was elected to the House in November after eight years in the Florida Legislature, has been under investigation by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement since last fall over allegations that he failed to disclose more than $130,000 in loans from a company owned by his mother. Rivera has since repaid the loans by selling off some real estate, but there are least two parallel probes into his finances and campaign records going on now, and Democrats have seized on the controversy to embarrass the House GOP leadership.

“Republican leader Eric Cantor pledged zero tolerance on ethics [violations], but it’s been 19 days, and he refuses to address the expanding investigation into Congressman David Rivera’s scandal-plagued record,” said Jesse Ferguson, a DCCC spokesman.

Cantor aides counter that the majority leader is aware of the allegations swirling around the Florida freshman, but they note that the state probe is ongoing, and Rivera has not been charged with any wrongdoing at this point. So at this point, Cantor will not take any stance on what should happen in the Rivera case.

Aside from refusing to seat him to begin with, it’s not clear what else the Republican leadership is supposed to do here. He’s not accused of violating House rules or Federal law or, indeed, any malfeasance of any sort as a Member. Rather, he was under investigation for violating Florida rules and somehow managed to get elected, anyway.

At this point, Rivera is almost surely entitled to perform his duties unless and until charges are filed in Florida.

While awkward, it’s hardly evidence of hypocrisy or a violation even of the spirit of the “zero tolerance” policy.  Rangel and Waters were found to have committed actual misconduct as Members. That’s simply a different kettle of fish.

via John Cole, who I gather disagrees.

Update (Doug Mataconis): Legally there is nothing the House of Representatives could have done here. In Powell v. McCormack the Supreme Court held that Congress cannot refuse to seat an elected member who meets the qualifications set forth in Article I, Section 5, Clause 1.

FILED UNDER: US Politics, , , , , , , , , , , , ,
James Joyner
About James Joyner
James Joyner is Professor and Department Head of Security Studies at Marine Corps University's Command and Staff College. He's a former Army officer and Desert Storm veteran. Views expressed here are his own. Follow James on Twitter @DrJJoyner.


  1. IP727 says:

    After ther dims white washed rangel, no other congress type has any worry.
    The precident has been set.

  2. mantis says:

    Apparently, IP727 thinks Charlie Rangel is the first member of congress who is also a crook.

    In other words, he/she just fell of the turnip truck.