Support For Kagan Lower Than Other Recent SCOTUS Nominees

A new Gallup poll shows that public support for Elena Kagan’s nomination to the Supreme Court is lower than it has been for most recent Supreme Court nominees:

PRINCETON, NJ — A USA Today/Gallup poll finds just under half of Americans, 46%, in favor of the Senate’s confirming Elena Kagan’s nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court. That level of support is generally lower than what Gallup has found when it first polled about other recent court nominations, trailing all others except Harriet Miers and Robert Bork.

Generally, initial public support for Supreme Court nominees has not been high, reaching only 59% for John Roberts. This is partly because substantial proportions of Americans do not have opinions of the men and women chosen for the court. The level of unfamiliarity with recent nominees has varied from a low of 19% for Roberts and Sonia Sotomayor to a high of 44% for Bork.

The variation in the percentage of Americans who have no opinion of the nominees complicates historical comparisons. However, Kagan’s relatively low historical ranking holds up even when one calculates the percentage in favor of her nomination only among those who have an opinion. The 59% of those with an opinion of the Kagan nomination who support her confirmation exceeds only the 55% of those with an opinion of the Miers and Bork nominations who supported their confirmations. Using this standard, Americans were initially most supportive of the nominations of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Clarence Thomas, and Roberts.

(…)

Kagan’s Senate confirmation hearings are set to begin later this month. In its history of polling about Supreme Court nominees, Gallup has generally found little change in the percentage favoring their confirmation during the confirmation process. To the extent that opinions change, it is generally in terms of a reduction in the percentage with no opinion and an increase in the percentage opposed.

The two other nominees who began the process with less than majority public backing ultimately were not confirmed: Miers’ nomination was withdrawn and Bork’s nomination was rejected in the Senate confirmation vote. At this point in the process, however, there does not seem to be much in Kagan’s background or in the political environment that would prevent her from becoming the first nominee to win confirmation with less than majority initial public backing.

So does this mean that Kagan’s nomination is in serious jeopardy in the way that Miers’ and Bork’s were ? Absolutely not.

In the end, I think that the public reaction to Kagan at the moment is a reflection of the fat that President Obama’s own approval numbers are mired in the high 40s and the fact that the public attention is focused elsewhere at the moment. Despite Gallup’s qualifications in the paragraphs above, I would suspect that public support for Kagan actually will increase, at least marginally, once the confirmation hearings begin in a few weeks. Unlike Bork, she does not appear to have any smoking guns in her background and does not appear poised to act in a way guaranteed to antagonize people during her confirmation hearings. Unlike Miers, there appears to be little question that Kagan is in fact intellectually qualified for the job she was nominated for. Add to this the fact that the Democrats have a very comfortable majority in the Senate and the fact that Republicans have essentially taken the filibuster off the table, and it becomes blindingly obvious that Elena Kagan is in absolutely no danger of not being confirmed.

FILED UNDER: Barack Obama, Law and the Courts, Politicians, US Politics, , ,
Doug Mataconis
About Doug Mataconis
Doug holds a B.A. in Political Science from Rutgers University and J.D. from George Mason University School of Law. He joined the staff of OTB in May 2010. Before joining OTB, he wrote at Below The BeltwayThe Liberty Papers, and United Liberty Follow Doug on Twitter | Facebook

Comments

  1. Michael Reynolds says:

    Well, she lacks the animal magnetism of an Alito, the homespun sincerity of a Roberts or the seething sexuality of a Ginsberg.

  2. just me says:

    i suspect it is because she is for the most part boring, and the media has no interest in stirring up controversy as they did with Bush’s picks. The fact that the democrats won’t even have to work hard to get her confirmed make her even less interesting media wise.

    I am not sure that a luke warm feeling about Obama has much to do with it, although I don’t take polls and do studies on the subject. I do think the media just doesn’t seem interested in covering the story-either to the positive or negative.

  3. Eric Florack says:

    In the end, I think that the public reaction to Kagan at the moment is a reflection of the fat that President Obama’s own approval numbers are mired in the high 40s and the fact that the public attention is focused elsewhere at the moment.

    It would be more fair to suggest perhaps is that the American voter seas Kagan as being directly online philosophically with Mr. Obama.

  4. Michael Reynolds says:

    People: It’s June. The media are on vacation. They’ve left a skeleton staff behind to obsess over the oil spill. But barring a death-meteor from outer space, a 2,000 point drop in the stock market, or a murdered blonde, we won’t hear much from them until they get back to New York and DC in September.

  5. G.A.Phillips says:

    seething sexuality of a Ginsberg.

    It’s the empty socketed glow of the eyes, the Lich Queen mystique………………