I’ll Have Another Scratched From Belmont Stakes

The horse that many believed would break a three decade drought without a Triple Crown winner has been scratched from the final leg by an injury:

I’ll Have Another, the Kentucky Derby and Preakness Stakes winner who was aiming to become the 12th horse to win the Triple Crown, was scratched Friday from Saturday’s Belmont Stakes because of a leg injury.

The promising 3-year-old colt, who had been a long-shot winner of the Derby and an impressive winner three weeks ago in the Preakness, might have tendinitis in his left front leg, his trainer, Doug O’Neill, said.

O’Neill and the horse’s owner, J. Paul Reddam, scheduled a news conference at Belmont Racetrack for 1 p.m. Friday.

A crowd of more than 100,000 people was expected to watch I’ll Have Another try to end the 34-year Triple Crown drought. Affirmed, in 1978, was the last to accomplish the feat. Nineteen horses have won the first two legs and lost the mile-and-a-half Belmont Stakes.

O’Neill had not trained I’ll Have Another in a customary fashion. He eschewed formal timed workouts in favor of near daily gallops. As of Thursday, O’Neill had declared himself thrilled by how his horse had worked and looked.

But it was on Thursday hat O’Neill first detected a potential problem, according to people associated with the trainer. He felt a little heat in I’ll Have Another’s left front leg, which can often be a sign of a physical ailment.

Then on Friday, O’Neill changed routines, perhaps because of his concern. I’ll Have Another was on the track at 5:30 a.m., three or so hours earlier than usual.

At 7:30 a.m., the horse underwent an ultrasound examination, which confirmed a problem.

Still, people in and around the horse’s barn at Belmont seemed upbeat as late as 9 a.m.

But by 11 a.m., things had changed. At least one person who had expected to fly from California for Saturday’s race was called by O’Neill and told not to bother.

I’ll Have Another’s scratch is one of the most momentous in racing history. Only two horses who won the Derby and Preakness — Burgoo King in 1932 and Bold Venture in 1936 — did not contest the Belmont, and that was well before the Triple Crown had achieved mainstream prominence.

I’m not really a big horse racing fan, but this is unfortunate if only because of the excitement that has been built up by the possibility of a long-standing drought, that started when yours truly wasn’t even ten years old yet, finally coming to an end. Hopefully, the horse’s injury isn’t too severe and he’ll be racing again. If not, he’ll most assuredly be put out to stud and, hey, that can’t be all that bad either, can it?

FILED UNDER: Entertainment, Quick Takes, Sports
Doug Mataconis
About Doug Mataconis
Doug holds a B.A. in Political Science from Rutgers University and J.D. from George Mason University School of Law. He joined the staff of OTB in May 2010. Before joining OTB, he wrote at Below The BeltwayThe Liberty Papers, and United Liberty Follow Doug on Twitter | Facebook

Comments

  1. al-Ameda says:

    that’s too bad, but the health of the horse has t ocome first.

    Network executives, on the other hand, will probably have to be hospitalized.

  2. Yea I imagine that ratings will be down tomorrow from what the would’ve been. But, like you said, the health matters and racing with even a minor injury can lead to something that would cause them to have to put the horse down.

    From the reports this afternoon it sounds like they’re retiring him. So, it’s off to the stud farm.

  3. @Doug Mataconis:

    From the reports this afternoon it sounds like they’re retiring him. So, it’s off to the stud farm.

    That poor, poor horse. ;>

  4. al-Ameda says:

    @Doug Mataconis:

    From the reports this afternoon it sounds like they’re retiring him. So, it’s off to the stud farm.

    Absolutely. The syndicated stud-rights are incredibly valuable, the marginal value of racing him again has to be negative relative to the value of the stud-rights at this moment.

  5. Franklin says:

    Even if the horse won a Triple Crown, it would have got an asterisk due to the drug suspicions, right?

  6. I am not aware of any drug suspicions with respect to this horse

  7. Tillman says:

    If you know next-to-nothing about horse racing or horse races, the headline you used is next to impossible to parse.

    On the other hand, now I know more things.